16 April, 2024

Worcestershire Vitality County Championship Div 1 at Trent Bridge Draw 14 points

 

Day 4

HEAVY SHOWERS SAVE NOTTS FROM POSSIBLE EMBARRASSING DEFEAT


Why not give a view from the bridge podcast a listen, Paul Johnson highly critical of the Notts player pathway, if you read between the lines.

or you could listen to eight minutes of Peter Moores waffle






Day 3




2019 RE-VISITED?

CALAMITOUS COLLAPSE No.2 in 2024 (in just the second game), WHAT'S GOING ON PETER?


A disastrous Notts collapse in the last hour from 125-1 to 144-7 on a near blameless pitch meant that the home side go into the last day second favourites as they lead Worcestershire by just 195 with only three wickets standing.

Notts lost their way in the first session after Worcester resumed on 220-6 off 63 overs. Brett D'Oliveira was dropped on 32 at mid-wicket by Hameed off Pennington in the 69th over as Notts opted to bowl Pennington and Harrison first thing. Patterson-White replaced Pennington from the Radcliffe Road End in the 71st over and started with a maiden, the first by a Notts spinner in 38 overs during the innings. D'Oliveira hit Patterson-White for four through point to bring up the Worcestershire 250 in the 75th over. The four was a result of a poor piece of fielding from substitute Schadendorf who let the ball go straight through him on the ropes. The next ball was dispatched for six over long on by the Pears skipper to bring up his half century in 89 balls. In the following over, Smith hit Harrison for six over mid-wicket. Patterson-White removed D'Oliveira lbw in the following over, 270 for 7 in the 77th over. The 7th wicket had raised an invaluable 84 in 23 overs. Baker (8) never looked comfortable against the spinners and had lasted 23 balls when he gave Harrison a return catch diving to his left, 279 for 8 in the 82nd over. Leach joined Smith and the pair were playing the spinners comfortable. A cut boundary by Leach through third man off Harrison in the 92nd over took Worcestershire passed 300. Pennington returned from the Radcliffe Road End for the 93rd over. A single for Smith off Harrison in the 94th over took him to 50 off 103 balls. The new ball was finally and belatedly taken by Harrison after 95.2 overs with Worcestershire 315 for 8. At lunch Worcestershire stood on 331 for 8 off 98 overs with Smith on 57 and Leach on 34. Very much the Pears morning with Notts sloppy in the field.

Pennington and Fletcher bowled together after lunch. Smith on 58 was dropped low down by Haynes off Pennington in the covers. Luckily he fell shortly after, swatting Pennington straight to James at long leg to depart for 8 off 136 balls (4x4, 1x6) 347 for 9 in the 105th over. Smith and Leach had shared a ninth wicket partnership of 68 in 23 overs. The Worcestershire 350 came up in the 108th over via a single for Leach off Fletcher. Harrison (5 for 128) picked up his fifth wicket and career best figures when he bowled Finch (3), on the sweep, leg stump. A promising display following his maiden 50 yesterday. He was supported by the wholehearted Pennington (3-62). Worcestershire 355 all out with Leach 48 not out off 88 balls (7x4). Notts led by 44 runs on first innings far less than what it should/could have been with Notts losing their way in the morning session.

Leach (Pavilion End) and Smith shared the new ball and Hameed and Duckett stood firm. Holder came on for the 10th over for a single over from the Radcliffe Road End before immediately changing ends to the Pavilion End. Baker started his spell from the Radcliffe Road End in the 12th over. A single for Duckett off Holder saw Notts to 50 in the 13th over. Notts got to tea on 59 for 0 in the 16th over with Duckett on 29 and Hameed on 29. The game seemingly drifting for a draw on the docile pitch and with the Kookaburra ball giving the bowlers little assistance.

With some of the crowd nodding off, Hameed, not getting to the pitch of the ball, skied Baker to Jones in the covers to depart for 40 (off 83 balls, 3x4); 81 for 1 for 24th over. Nathan Smith replaced Finch from the Pavilion End for the 29th over with a straight driven four by Duckett bringing up his 50 of 73 balls and Notts going past 100. In the following over, Slater hit Baker for six over mid-wicket. The game though was to take a sudden turn as Notts somehow contrived to lose 6 wickets for 19 runs and Smith take 4 wickets for no runs in seven deliveries.

Duckett's innings ended when he was chipped a delivery from Smith, bowling round the wicket, to Jones at square leg who took the catch low down. Duckett out for 63 (off 87 balls, 6x4); 125 for 2 in the 35th over. Two balls later, Clarke was brilliantly caught off the inside edge by keeper Roderick diving a long way to his left to depart without scoring, a second wicket in the over for Smith. Off the last ball of the over, Montgomery fell lbw for a three-ball duck, 125 for 4. A triple wicket maiden for the Kiwi. With the first ball of his next over, the pumped-up Smith bowled Haynes off stump for 1 with the delivery jagging in; 127 for 5. Slater was dropped on 21 by Jones at square leg off Smith but fell in the next over caught at short leg by Kashif Ali off Baker for 23, 137 for 6 in the 40th over. Finch replaced Baker for the 43rd over and with his fourth delivery Harrison (3) shouldered arms and lost his off stump, 144 for 7. The second embarrassing and unforgivable collapse by Notts in a week, the batsmen have to learn handle pressure situations in a much better way. James (7 not out) and Patterson-White (1 not out) survived the final 33 balls of the day as Notts closed on a sorry 151-7 off 48 overs.

A top temperature of 7 degrees and gale force winds are forecasted tomorrow, the worst forecast for bowling imaginable albeit on an eight-day old surface. Notts will be hoping to either add another 50 runs or that the light showers forecast take a large chunk of playing time out of the day after what can only be described as a calamitous third day today. MAG



Day 2

HARRISON HAS AN ALL ROUND GOOD DAY

but James misses out on century

Notts lead by 179 runs at the end of the second day of their match against Worcestershire. The visitors closed on 220-6 in reply to Notts’ 399 all out.


Notts resumed on 305-6 with James and Harrison at the crease. They carried on their good work from the previous evening on the slow surface. In the 103rd over, a single for James off Leach (Pavilion End) saw him to his half ton off 108 balls. Finch replaced Smith from the Radcliffe Road End for the 106th over and conceded 12 as Notts chased their third batting point. In the following over a four through mid-wicket by Harrison off Leach brought up the 100 stand in 226 balls. A four through the covers by Harrison off Finch saw Notts to 350 off 108 overs. At the bonus point cut-off, Notts were 362-6 off 110 overs. A pushed single off Holder by Harrison took him to a maiden first class 50 off 141 balls. Harrison (52 off 148 balls, 7x4) skied Baker and Libby took the catch running back from mid-on to take a well-judged effort . The 7th wicket stand added 146 runs, a record for Notts in this fixture beating the 139 stand between Cyril Poole and Bruce Dooland at New Road in 1956. Patterson-White was disappointedly out for a seven-ball duck leg before to D'Oliveira, umpire Wharf taking his time before raising the finger, 385 for 8 in the 119th over. In the 124th over, Fletcher (6) hit Baker for six over long off, but fell in the same over going for a quick single to Brett D'Oliveira at mid-off the Worcester skipper finding the stumps with a direct hit, 396 for 9. James (96 off 180 balls, 9x4) hit a waist high full toss from Finch straight to Baker at mid-wicket. James stayed at the crease hoping the umpires would call no-ball but to no avail. A fine effort from James who followed up his stellar 2022 season with the bat with Notts 405 runs @17.60 last season. James sole half-ton being his 50 at The Oval in July 399 all out off 128.2 overs. Pennington 0 not out. Nathan Smith (3-67), who did not take a wicket today, was the pick of the bowlers. Special mention for Josh Baker who fought back well after being demolished by Clarke yesterday to finish with 34-7-99-2.

Notts got off to a tremendous start with the ball. Fletcher removed Roderick lbw with the third ball of the reply, 0 for 1. In the following over, Libby (2) was brilliantly caught one-handed by Harrison diving full length to his right at third slip off Pennington, 4 for 2. After a three over opening spell, Pennington was replaced by James from the Pavilion End. Patterson-White came on for the 18th over. Four overs later, Jones hit Patterson-White for six over mid-wicket. Jones was dropped on 32 by Clarke diving to his left off Pennington in the 25th over, a hard chance. Pennington subjected Kashif Ali (40), who scored twin tons in previous match at Edgbaston, to a sustained short ball barrage. The right-hander was clearly struggling and eventually Pennington got his man when he backed away and topped edged him to Haynes at third man who took the catch diving forwards, 82 for 3 in the 27th over. An all-Worcestershire dismissal. Harrison replaced Patterson-White, who bowled a poor five-over spell, for the following over. James replaced Pennington for the last over before tea. Worcestershire 90 for 3 off 31 overs at tea with Jones on 38 and Hose on 5.





Fletcher and Harrison bowled in tandem after tea in the evening sunshine. A swept four by Jones off Harrison brought up the Worcestershire 100 in the 34th over. Harrison was starting to get the ball to turn. A cut shot over the slips by Jones off Fletcher brought up his 50 off 105 balls. James returned for the 39th over. Patterson-White switched ends and came on for the 45th over. Then came a spell where Worcestershire lost three wickets in eight overs. Attempting a shot to mid-wicket, Hose (33) was caught and bowled skying a mistiming a ball from Harrison which looped back to the bowler who took an easy catch, 155 for 4 in the 46th over. Jones hit Harrison for a straight six in the 48th over. Jones pushed back a delivery from Harrison and was caught and bowled low down to his right by Harrison for 90 (off 142 balls, 8x4, 2x6), 186 for 5 in the 54th over. Holder lasted two balls before edging Harrison to Duckett at first slip, 186 for 6 in the 54th over. Smith joined D’Oliveira and the pair saw out the remaining nine overs, An edged four by Smith off Patterson-White meant Worcestershire passed 200 in the 59th over. Stumps were drawn at 18:20 with Worcestershire on 220-6 off 63. The wicket remains very slow, but Harrison (18-0-78-3) in particular was getting the ball to turn. Patterson-White (15-0-57-0) was better from the Radcliffe Road End but there were too many short balls from the slow left-armer. Indeed the two spinners had bowled 33 overs between them without a single maiden. MAG



Day 1





LED BY ANOTHER CLARKE TON, NOTTS MAKE STEADY PROGRESS

Joe Clarke led the way with 105 (off 185 balls, 9x4, 3x6) as Notts after winning the toss finished on 305-6 off 96 overs against Worcestershire on another windy day at Trent Bridge.

On the same strip that was used against Essex. Notts elected to bat and the wicket expected to spin there were recalls for Liam Patterson-White, for the first time since last May, and Luke Fletcher with Brett Hutton and Dane Paterson both carrying injuries.

Joe Leach (Pavilion End) and Kiwi all-rounder Nathan Smith shared the new ball in the early morning sunshine. In the 4th over, Hammed, attempting to whip the ball towards mid-wicket but losing his balance, was bowled by Smith for 11, 19 for 1. Four overs later, Duckett nibbled at a ball from Smith (9) and edged behind to keeper Roderick, 34 for 2. Clarke joined Slater in the middle and played sensibly. Holder replaced Smith for the 12th over and Finch replaced Leach in the 13th over. The Notts 50 came up in the 15th over. Slow left armer Josh Baker came on in the 20th over from the Radcliffe Road End. Smith returned for the 23rd over with Notts making steady progress. Just before lunch, D'Oliveira came on for the 29th over. Slater was dropped on 40 at short leg by Kashif Ali off Baker. Notts 83 for 2 off 30 overs at lunch with Slater on 40 and Clarke on 16.

Leach and Baker were bowling immediately after lunch, a boundary for Slater off Baker saw Notts to 100 in the 34th over. In the same over, Slater to get his 50 off 103 balls and Clarke hoisted the slow left-armer for 6 over long on and a straight four, 16 off the over. In the 36th over Clarke hit Baker for 6 over deep extra cover and then got a single to reach his 50 off 88 balls. With Baker proving expensive, he was taken off and replaced by Finch. A pulled four through square leg by Slater off Finch brought up the 100 partnership off 183 balls. Slater hit Finch for six over backward square leg in the 42nd over. Next over, Holder came back on. Despite the pitch being now on its fifth day, it still had little terror, although it was very much on the slow side. Clarke hit Finch for successive boundaries but in the same over, Slater (70 off 142 balls, 7x4, 1x6) was dismissed, strangled down the leg side caught by Roderick, 167 for 3 in the 46th over. The third wicket had added 133 in 38 overs. Though skipper D’Oliveira put four men were on the boundary for Clarke, he accelerated from 16 to 68 in just 48 balls before slowing down following the dismissal of Slater. Right-armer seamer Smith picked up his third wicket, as a flat-footed Montgomery (11) edged to Holder at first slip, 190 for 4 in the 55th over. Notts got to 200 in the 57th over via a six over square leg by Clarke off Smith. D'Oliveira returned in the 61st over. Notts got to tea on 223 for 4 off 64 overs with Clarke on 98 and Haynes on 11. Notts adding 140 in the middle session for the loss of two wickets.

Clarke reached a mature 100 off 168 balls with an offside two off Leach in the first over after tea. In his following over, Leach had Haynes lbw for 15, 232 for 5 in the 67th over. Haynes clearly unhappy with the decision of umpire Wharf. Notts were wobbling when three overs later Clarke (105), attempting a cut shot, edged Baker to keeper Roderick, 238 for 6 in the 70th over. Harrison surprisingly coming at eight ahead of Patterson-White along with James guided Notts to 250 in the 76th over. Kashif Ali came on a single over bowling leg spin for the 79th over replacing Finch from the Pavilion End. The new ball was taken by Leach and Smith with Notts 260 for 6 off 80 overs. James and Harrison batted the situation perfectly. Holder came on for the 88th over. Smith changed ends to bowl from the Pavilion End for the 91st over. A four through square leg off the returning Baker by Harrison saw Notts pass 300 in the 95th over. Notts reached the close at 18:20 standing on 305-6 off 96 overs with James (39 not out) and Harrison (25 not out). The seventh wicket pair have so far added 67 in 26 overs. MAG


11/04

The Notts squad has been announced and contains no surprises, other than Tom Moores doesn't even make the published squad:

Haseeb Hameed c
Ben Duckett
Ben Slater
Joe Clarke x
Matthew Montgomery
Jack Haynes
Lyndon James
Liam Patterson-White
Calvin Harrison
Brett Hutton
Luke Fletcher
Dillon Pennington
Dane Paterson



The Pears squad is:






10/04

Following the heavy defeat to Essex, wise sages have warned against making rash decisions and instituting wholesale changes. Give 'em time, let the new faces settle in, let the new skipper find his feet, the bowlers need to find their rhythm, class is permanent etc . Essex have a strong side and should be in the race for the championship, but they shouldn't have beaten Notts by 250+ runs, which begs a few questions:


Why did Notts just roll-over on Monday like the faithful family retriever to have their tummy tickled? Where was the grit, the fight, the pride?

Why couldn't any of the Notts bowlers get the help from the ball and/or the pitch that Sam Cook did? Yes Essex had the best of the bowling conditions on Monday (no gale) but Notts lost their last 16 wickets of that game for just 114 runs, and Cook took a hat trick that derailed our first innings in breezy conditions. Notts looked to be bowling to a plan, bowling short, which was evidently the wrong plan in this observer's opinion. Do we need a new planner?

Poor Brett Hutton gave the appearance that he was playing the last game of the season, not the first, with wary legs and looked as though he was running on fumes.
Dane Paterson managed to bag a 5-fer on auto-pilot in the Essex first innings, but in their second innings looked as though he had just got off a plane (which he had).

If the talismanic Luke Fletcher is fit, I think he should play against Worcestershire. It would give everyone a lift, spectators and players! There are 13 more matches to go, the fitness of Brett and Dane is vital to Notts' hopes and we wouldn't want to break either of them at this very early stage.

The experiment leaving Tom Moores out, in order to play an extra batsman, didn't work on this occasion; Clarke's keeping was on a par with Moores' competency (or otherwise) but Monty's batting didn't cash-in. After one game, I see no reason to throw the baby out with the bath water yet.

I would expect to see Pravda publish the same 14 man squad tomorrow as they did last week. The beaten eleven plus Fletch, Toby and Tom Moores.

24 comments:

  1. So agree short pitched "barrage", more a whimper, must be abandoned. Apart from not working, tends to make bowler injuries more likely.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Percy the Puma 🐆 booked into my clinic earlier - he’s not happy with his tail as it isn’t as long as the Harrison Hutton Pennington Paterson tail - he’s quite jealous and has requested a tail extension to compete with that one
    If Hit Man Hutton is still struggling as he appeared to be, then I also would bring in Big Fletch, or perhaps a rare outing for Sir Toby of Pettman ?
    Can’t believe for one minute cautious Pete will give a chance to James “Purple” Hayes so options are somewhat limited on the bowling front
    Who will give you more runs over the season ? General Montgomery or Major Tom ? Don’t think there’s that much in it TBH despite their vastly differing batting techniques
    This should be an easier game on paper 📝 than playing a top side like Essex, but the sooner Will Young comes into the top6, the better
    I did think Jack Haynes looked good and I think he will be a very good signing indeed

    ReplyDelete
  3. Can Notts afford to include an additional tale ender in the form of Tom Moores. I don't think so.
    Scoring 300 plus runs a season batting at 6 or 7, is a luxury Notts can ill afford. You could legitimately, leave out either Slater or Montgomery, move Haynes up the order, and bring in Patterson White. Can't see much difference either way.If Notts roll over to Worcester , as they did against Essex, then the alarm bells will well and truly be ringing , very loudly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A similar result against Worcs to what was against Essex would be inexcusable.

      Member 101

      Delete
  4. If Fletch is fit then he should play , However the worry has to be his recent injury record, Will he be able to last four days ? If there is the slightest doubt then surely Toby Pettman comes into the equation, As to who gets a rest then it's obviously a choice of who is the fittest of Hutton or Paterson, You could also make a change with LPW getting a chance ahead of Harrison, That decision would have to be based on the feeling that LPW is the better batsman of the two, You could argue against that Harrison seems the more likely wicket taker of two , Not an easy decision but that's what PM is paid the big bucks to make.

    Batting wise given PM's cautious nature I would think he will give the present occupiers another chance to prove their worth, The only possible change might be the return of his son with Monty's place most in danger.

    You would have to think that surely Notts would not capitulate in such embarrassing manner again, Confidence though might be a little low, So a win no matter how it is achieved is of paramount importantance both for the confidence levels and also to get the season up and running...

    Zanga

    ReplyDelete
  5. That has surprised 😲 me a tad - I was almost expecting Ground Control to panic 😱 and bring back Major Tom
    On this basis and whilst Joe Clarke is happy to keep wicket and doesn’t affect his own game, could you not do this for almost all the red ball games ? Playing an extra batsman with that lower order is certainly an option to consider ?
    The dual between LPW and Calvin Harrison is an intriguing one - Liam is undoubtedly the better batsman and containing bowler, but Calvin showed that wrist spinners can be wicket takers on any surface in pretty much any conditions
    I wish the new Capitano would have the confidence to actually bowl him, given his selection in the side, otherwise it seems a pointless selection albeit with no Mull he can always provide rest for the seamers also ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Do we know if Tom is injured - wasn’t he replaced as keeper during during a warm up match ? - or dropped or somehow only concentrating on white ball?

    Either way, for now it creates more batting options. The downside being that we risk James being “stranded” at 7 due to a longish tail (unless lpw back in)

    Jim G

    ReplyDelete
  7. 80NOT OUT
    Sides can get away with a long tail providing they have a top class bowling attack with fully fit options .
    Notts do not have this because of question marks against three or four of the current squad . Much better weather is expected at TB for the next four days . No doubt the long suffering faithfull Notts Members will be gratefull for a bit of sun and some decent heads down batting from the top and middle order. !?

    ReplyDelete
  8. C’mon then - who expected that ?
    Playing on the same strip, effectively a day 5 deck on day 1 and 2 spinners selected at Trent Bridge in April - it just doesn’t happen
    As a mate said earlier it’s probably out of necessity? Great Dane and the Hit Man struggling, Tongue and Stone god only knows as the Beach 🏖 Boys would sing 🎶 and a reluctance to go with either Pettman, Purple Hayes or Loten - is the Kookaburra ball again just too much of a gamble for any of those 3 squad bowlers ?
    I’m going to leave General Montgomery alone - he’s still young and obviously needs exposure to Div One bowling attacks to improve his game. I may have been a bit too harsh on my assessment of him previously - he is still young and has got time to improve
    Nathan Smith bowled well I have not seen him previously and it shows, despite batsmen unusually being in the game in April conditions, quality bowlers can still be a real handful - as demonstrated perfectly by Sam Cook 👩‍🍳 in the previous game
    Presumably, the pitch will start to turn now - we used this similar tactic previously when we signed Ravi Ashwin to disastrous results but I don’t think the Pears 🍐 are too strong in this department ?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just what we wanted from Notts today. I sense - maybe naively - a new willingness from Hameed to mix the team up a bit. Having the extra batsman makes all the difference and the two spinners add to the batting strength as well as giving the feeling that Notts are prepared to do things a little differently

    Stone and Tongue must surely be two of the highest paid bowlers in county cricket and although injuries can strike at any time, you already get the feeling that they’ll play a handful of games between them this season

    Jim G

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As in “only” a handful
      JG

      Delete
  10. 80 NOT OUT
    A retirement “rest” home has been built a stones throw away from the Trent Bridge ground . One or two Notts players might be in there before long . Some will no doubt pull a muscle by simply opening their wage packets!?
    Only joking obviously but the bowling situation will become fraught if Fletch cant keep going . Important not to rush Hutton and Patto back into the ELEVEN if they are not fully fit . We need them for the whold season ahead - both top men , and vital and reliable wicket takers who just bowl and bowl .
    With the first team selections so far you do feel a change has occurred in the selection process . Hameed perhaps has a more flexible approach. Those that dont deliver will be dropped and those that deserve a chance will be given one ?
    What is the situation with favoured son Tom Moores . Is he preparing for a white ball only career in the mould of world wanderer Alex Hales ? Surely Tom is simply not good enough for that sort of future career ?
    Lets hope Notts carry on the good steady work and get to 400+ today . With the rare sight of two spinners in the side in early April then anything can happen . Should be a very interesting game with a reasonable weather forecast for the next 3 days .
    Come on Notts ! Give the faithfull the victory needed to get the season properly started and with a bit of hope for better times to come.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Shouted out loud twice, not abusive, not against anyone. Just frustration This in the 45 minutes before tea. Mostly good weather, but heavy cloud cover, ideal for swing bowling at that time.. Again we chose our wet fish in the face version of "bodyline". One wicket did fall, in that time, a pitched up ball caught at deep backward point on the boundary. Short stuff just waste of energy and deliveries. Could have had 2 or 3 more wickets. Incredibly, no slip fielders. Felt for Pennington, allowed to bowl his natural style, could have been very dangerous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Brains Trust under guidance from their Analyst had devised a plan. Repeat after me Rich, "Trust the Plan and never deviate from the Plan. The Plan is sacrosanct".

      Delete
  12. Thanks for reminder, no more deviation from me. Who needs flexible strategy anyway ?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Good catch too by Haynes, as well as one by Harrison. That ball itself was not short, pitched up and a rather cramped, backing away cut shot. Law on sustained short pitched bowling is not being enforced by any umpire am aware of. They are just no balling the third over the batter shoulder delivery in an over. So a short pitched ball that might injure a batter is OK, but one that sails over his head is not. This is not how bodyline was outed from cricket, and seems it could be back.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ant Botha called that mini collapse, so what the heck would a proper collapse look like?

    ReplyDelete
  15. That wasn't laughing, that was teeth chattering!

    ReplyDelete
  16. All things considered - and at 125-1 on a seemingly benign pitch and with the seamless Kookaburra ball that was undoubtedly the finest collapse since Percy the long tail puma 🐆 collapsed on my clinic floor, just after winning 🥇 best collapse of the year award for 2023
    So now then, Sam Cook 👩‍🍳 and Nathan Smith can bowl with the unresponsive Kookaburra ??!

    ReplyDelete
  17. 80 Not out
    Hopefully the dodgy weather forecast tomorrow please a bit of late order resolve can save Notts from another repeat . This latest batting fiasco must be a chastening experience for some in the Notts Eleven !?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Has Peter Moores stopped giving interviews, or is he throwing a mardy, because Hameed doesn't want his son in the team.
    Notts fortunes will undoubtedly improve when those two, plus Newell are ousted from the club.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 80 NOTOUT
    Match abandoned at about 2.40.
    Have Notts got out of jail ?
    With a full days play then the odds were that Notts would lose this one .
    It’s been a cold windswept 3 days plus for the hardy faithfull down at the Bridge. Everyone attending the 3 days plus this morning deserve a medal as big as a frying pan .
    Think N Z newly married Young will be available on Friday for the Taunton trip . He should steady the ship . A fine , classy player . Who gets dropped ?
    L. P. W.? Clarke seems to be able to cope with wicket keeping duties alongside his fine batting in the first two matches . So what’s the situation with Tom Moores ? Could it be that Hameed doesn’t rate him ?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Must admit to hoping rain might shorten the day, There was always the feel that if either of the not out batsmen got out quickly then the innings would pretty quickly finish, Notts would have needed at least 250 to have made it a good contest. Anywhere around the 200 mark with a deep batting lineup would have played into Worcestershire's hands

    Looking ahead to Somerset and the need to get Will Young into the team You would have to say Montys place is most at danger, No scores this season Perhaps a few second eleven games might help restore his confidence,

    ReplyDelete
  21. 80 NOT OUT
    Amazing statistic.
    18 four day games played so far this season - and only ONE victory out of all 18 - ( Notts lose to Essex)
    Why has this happened ?
    Poor weather ?
    The use of the KOOKIE ball ?
    Players bedding in for the season - perhaps many not 100% match fit ?
    More runs being scored and bowlers in general struggling in the conditions of the past two weeks?
    Looking at the Notts live stream shortly before the abandonment I saw a powerful gust of wind catching the waterproof sheet covering the wicket and completely upending one of the ground staff . Could easily have caused a whiplash injury . Never seen that happen before.

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts...