ECB Reporters Network.
Friday, 30 August 2024.
PTG 4609-22209.
Glamorgan is set to face Somerset in the highly anticipated Metro Bank One Day Cup Final at Trent Bridge, Nottingham, on Sunday, 22nd September. The match, which will start at 11am and promises to be a thrilling encounter as both teams vie for the prestigious title.
Glamorgan have been working with our partners and supporter groups to provide our supporters travelling from Wales with a range of travel options to get to Trent Bridge
MSG Tours - Same Day Coach Return
Our partners MSG Tours are putting on a same-day coach service. Places are available for £68 per person. This package offers round-trip transportation to and from Trent Bridge on the day of the final. Pick-up from Sophia Gardens will be at 6am.
Limited car parking is available at Sophia Gardens for the day as an optional extra to this package for £5 per vehicle
To book coach travel click here: https://msgtours.octopustravelmatrix.com/booking/GLAMReturnCoachBusM01
*Tickets for the game are not included and must be purchased separately.
St. Helen's Balconiers "Daffodil Tours" Package
The St. Helen's Balconiers have arranged a "Daffodil Tours" package, which includes coach travel and two nights bed and breakfast in Nottingham. The package costs £195.00 for a single room and £145.00 per person for a double/twin room.
For more information on the "Daffodil Tours" package, visit https://www.thebalconiers.co.uk .
*Tickets for the game are not included and must be purchased separately.
You can book your tickets for the Final by clicking here or by calling the Nottinghamshire Cricket Ticket Office on 0115 899 0300.
Adult ticket prices start from £26, Under 16s are £5 and there are £10 tickets for under 21s in the Family Area.
Tickets can be purchased anywhere in the ground, but Radcliffe Road Lower West is where a number of Glamorgan supporters are already purchasing.
CEO's open letter |
OK so £3.99 isn't a lot, but will it be watchable, as Foxes usual streaming is let's say unreliable, to be kind. In all honesty it's one of the worst on the circuit for buffering, freezing and for being out of sync. This is brought to you by the same county that charged admission to a MBC game (Kibworth) then charged an extra £10 for a seat once you were inside the ground or you could have had for a fiver what was effectively a stool for the day.
Following an investigation by the Cricket Regulator, Gloucestershire CCC’s Miles Hammond has been charged with a breach of Section 3.2.3 of the Professional Conduct Regulations, relating to the use abusive language towards a spectator during a T20 Blast match between Somerset and Gloucestershire at the County Ground, Taunton, on 7 July 2024.
ECB Directive 3.2.3 concerns the use of language that, in the circumstances, is obscene, offensive, insulting or seriously insulting, making an obscene or seriously insulting gesture or engaging in any similar conduct.
The charge will be considered in due course by the independent Cricket Discipline Commission. No further comment will be made until the case is concluded.
Following an investigation by the Cricket Regulator, Josh Cobb and Worcestershire County Cricket Club have been charged with breaches of Regulations 3.2 and 3.3 of the ECB Professional Conduct Regulations, relating to the use of a non-compliant bat in a Vitality T20 Blast game against Durham on 5 July 2024.
ECB Directive 3.2 concerns participants conducting themselves fairly and properly on the field, and ECB Directive 3.3 concerns conduct, acts or omissions which are improper, or which may be prejudicial to the interests of cricket, or which may bring the ECB or the game of cricket into disrepute.
The charge will be considered in due course by the independent Cricket Discipline Commission. No further comment will be made until the case is concluded.
Sussex:
New cricket ground stand plans go before committee
Detailed plans for three new stands at Sussex County Cricket Ground go before councillors next week.
Sussex County Cricket Club has applied to replace an informal seating area with two stands of permanent seating and to demolish and replace the hospitality facilities with a third new stand at the Hove venue.
The two new stands – either side of the bowling sight screens with storage beneath – are described in the application as modernising the north end of the ground, backing onto Cromwell Road.
Also proposed are new bar/ refreshment facilities and more toilets to serve the new stands.
A new south-east stand a bar/refreshment facilities and toilets is also planned near the Brighton and Hove Reform Synagogue on the corner of Easton Road and Palmeira Avenue.
There are six objections to the plans, raising concerns about noise, overdevelopment, additional traffic and the impact on neighbours.
An objector, whose details are removed on the council website, said: “This development will destroy what little remains of the original ambience of this once lovely ground. And it would be interesting to know who is going to fill all these new seats.
“As it is, the temporary stands which are erected every year mostly remain unused throughout the season.
If, however, by some miracle cricket fans suddenly flock to Hove then it will be impossible for residents to park anywhere near their homes and noise levels will be unbearable.”
Another objector whose details are also redacted, said: “The size of the stands worries me, as we currently face into our communal garden which runs parallel to the cricket ground.
“This is extremely and worryingly close to where the proposed stands will be. I am aware that the cricket ground is rarely full, so I’m confused as to why extra seating is being built.”
There is one letter of support from a person describing themselves as an “immediate neighbour” who “wholeheartedly supports the application”.
Brighton and Hove City Council’s Planning Committee granted outline planning permission for a scheme to revamp the whole ground in March 2020, allowing the development to go ahead in principle.
At the same time, it granted full planning for the first two phases – a nine-storey block of flats with a “pub restaurant” on the ground floor, which has since been built, and redevelopment of the south-west stand with new hospitality facilities.
The application due to be decided next week is for full planning for the third and fourth phases. Officers have recommended granting the scheme.
The planning Committee is due to meet at 11am at Hove Town Hall on Wednesday 7 August. The meeting is scheduled for webcast on the council website.
County cricket: the ever-entertaining One-Day Cup deserves more respect
1) The spirit of cricket?
Cricket fans are getting used to the nature of One-Day Cup: there is an enticing mix of youth and experience in the teams; players and fans enjoy a camaraderie that is promoted by a shared outsider status; and there are some fine matches played at the most cricket-friendly time of the year. Last year’s final was hardly a revisit to the heady days of the Gillette Cup in the 1970s, but it was a tremendous match that spawned homespun heroes and not a person lucky enough to be there will ever forget it.
But then this statement arrives: “Keaton Jennings has been selected by London Spirit as a replacement player for the remainder of The Hundred.”
Why should another competition treat this one with such contempt? Jennings is the Lancashire captain and he had led the side in their first two matches, but has now been swept up by a wholly different entity to which he has no connection and is gone. Imagine if that was your club’s Saturday skipper and multiply it by 1,000.
He is, of course, blameless and one can surmise the attitude of his employer by the terseness of the statement above. If London Spirit have selection problems, they should solve them by themselves.
2) Golden boy Brown stifles Lancashire
It’s not often that Derbyshire feature at the top of any table but, with a 100% record after three matches, they are sitting pretty at the peak of Group A.
The latest of those victories was a walk in the park against Lancashire, the match done in less than 40 overs as the Red Rose’s 100 all out proved every bit as inadequate as it looked. The star of that bowling effort was Pat Brown, who was once the future of England’s white-ball bowling but, since being capped in 2019, has suffered from injuries and lack of form. It’s hard to believe that he’s still only 25.
Five for 37 was his reward from his first 50-over match of the season. It’s not a bad time to be catching the white-ball selectors’ eye again.
3) Worcestershire punching hard
Though they have only played two matches, Worcestershire are the form team of the early exchanges, two thumping wins putting them second in Group A.
It might be easy to look at their opening win at home to Middlesex and think that the visitors were as affected by absences as their fellow Londoners, Surrey. But there were some experienced pros like Mark Stoneman and Sam Robson in the visitors’ lineup, even if the bowling looked a little ripe for the working-over handed out by Gareth Roderick and Ed Pollock, whose opening stand of 259 in 35 overs must have demoralised the visitors.
Will Worcestershire push on from a dream start? On Friday, they face off against the other county with an immaculate record, Derbyshire, and something will have to give.
4) The Gnoll turns out nice
Glamorgan, the 2021 champions, have won their first three games and lead Group B.
Their latest win came courtesy of three fine individual performances: Andy Gorvin’s five for 56, and a pair of centuries for Eddie Byrom and Colin Ingram. Nottinghamshire may have thought they were in with a chance at the halfway mark after posting 274 for nine, but that score was probably 50 or so under par on a small playing area.
Though known more for rugby, The Gnoll has staged cricket in Neath since 1848 and will host two One-Day Cup matches this season, Sussex’s turn to stare at the satnav for Friday’s match. Though laudable to take a couple of matches away from Cardiff, it’s disappointing that the only Welsh county will not play a fixture at Swansea or Colwyn Bay this season, grounds steeped in history.
5) Batter of the week
Everyone loves a low-scoring thriller, with the possible exception of those in the middle.
That was an unfamiliar place for Jake Lintott to find himself, certainly with the pads on, as he looked up to see Warwickshire 149 for six, still needing 25 to beat Sussex. There was all the time in the world to get them, but that invites consideration of multiple strategies, the obvious option of swinging for the bleachers probably the worst. He must have thought back to his only innings of the month, lbw first ball.
Without the addition of a run, he lost the set Will Rhodes and became the senior pro, his team’s remaining resources Michael Booth and Tazeem Chaudry Ali (12 appearances between them) and a man who had not scored a run for two months, Oliver Hannon-Dalby.
Lintott went old-school, making 11 off 28 balls, running the winning two after Hannon-Dalby edged Jack Carson’s delivery. Sometimes it’s not how many, it’s when. And, sometimes, it’s also how.
6) Bowler of the week
Jack Leach’s England career is not over, but he would not be human if he didn’t look at Shoaib Bashir’s bowling and the plaudits it is attracting and wonder if, in reality, it probably is.
Swallowing that disappointment and coming off the back of an early season in which he has found wickets hard to come by, the left-armer took the ball for the 12th over with Durham 47 for two in pursuit of 242. Finding some assistance from the surface, Leach snared two wickets in his first over and another two in his fourth, eviscerating the home team’s middle order, Somerset running out easy winners.
His captain, supporters at Taunton and, I’d venture, cricket followers around the country will be hoping that Leach’s six for 26 marks the start of a strong second half of the season for one of the county game’s most popular figures.
Delhi Capitals owners agree £120m deal to buy majority share in Hampshire
Exclusive: Hampshire will become first county owned by an overseas franchise should the purchase be ratified by the ECB
by Matt Hughes
The owners of the Delhi Capitals have agreed a £120 million deal to buy Hampshire in a historic move in which they will become the first county to be owned by an overseas franchise.
Under the terms of an agreement that has been passed to the England and Wales Cricket Board for ratification, the GMR Group is poised to take full ownership of Hampshire and a 51 per cent stake in the Southern Brave, with the option to complete a 100 per cent takeover of the Hundred franchise. The Indian bid for Hampshire was first revealed by Telegraph Sport in January, with both parties hoping it will be finalised before the ECB’s sale of their 49 per cent share of the eight Hundred franchises closes at the end of the year.
The Delhi part-owners are understood to have beaten a second bid from rival Indian Premier League franchise Lucknow Super Giants with an offer which values Hampshire at £120 million, although that price includes the club’s debts of around £60 million. GMR owns 50 per cent of both the Delhi Capitals and their Women’s Premier League franchise, with another Indian conglomerate JSW Group owning the other half.
Hampshire’s value appears to have risen during the negotiating process from a starting point of around £100 million, an increase which reflects the ECB’s decision to gift them a 51 per cent stake in Southern Brave. The high valuation is also down to an impressive international fixture list and the promise of strong ticket sales secured by owner Rod Bransgrove, who is set to be rewarded for his shrewd stewardship of a club he rescued from bankruptcy 24 years ago.
After more than two decades of lobbying the ECB, Bransgrove has finally secured an Ashes Test match for Hampshire in 2027, while the Utilita Bowl will also host an India Test in 2029, another Test the following year and eight England white-ball matches between 2025 and 2031. In addition to buying the club, GMR will also take control of the Utilita Bowl, a Hilton hotel and a golf course all on the same site near Southampton.
The takeover by GMR, which also owns 50 per cent of the Dubai Capitals in the United Arab Emirates’ ILT20 and Seattle Orcas in America’s Major League Cricket, is hugely significant for English cricket as it puts the Indian franchise in a strong position to become the first outright owners of a Hundred team. While a sale process which the ECB has likened to “speed dating” is not due to start until next month, with 51 per cent of the Southern Brave already under their control a full takeover would appear to be a formality.
Hampshire declined to comment when approached by Telegraph Sport.
The ECB has been actively courting Indian investment themselves so is not thought to have any objections to Delhi’s bid. Its main concern in assessing such bids is that the interests of the game’s existing stakeholders are protected, particularly Hampshire’s fellow Southern Brave shareholders, Sussex.
In addition to significant investment the impending takeover opens up the possibility of Hampshire gaining access to some of Delhi Capitals’ players, particularly their youngsters. Whilst the Board of Control for Cricket in India [BCCI] does not currently permit Indians to play in the Hundred, that is likely to change if Delhi buy into the competition. There is nothing to stop Hampshire seeking short-term signings for county cricket. There is considerable confidence at Hampshire that the takeover could put the club in a position to challenge Surrey’s domestic dominance.
In another significant development Rajasthan Royals have reopened talks with Yorkshire about a takeover at Headingley, although that process will take considerably longer to complete as chairman Colin Graves has yet to get the approval from members to take the club private. The demutualisation process needs to be approved by a 75 per cent majority in a ballot involving at least 50 per cent of Yorkshire’s 6000 members.
When announcing his plan to go private in May Graves warned that Yorkshire would be “fighting for their survival” later this year without external investment, but more then two months on the club have yet to schedule a vote. Leeds MP Alex Sobel is campaigning against Graves and has urged members “to hold their nerve and oppose” the proposal.
A groundskeeper’s life: ‘It’s hard – but I’ve seen the world’s best players’.
Tanya Aldred.
The Guardian.
Thursday, 1 August 2024.
PTG 4578-22078.
01/08
Appeared on BBC the other day...
31/07
It's almost August...
As outlined in this Foxes News Article LCCC plan to charge viewers to watch a couple of games this season via their streaming service.
As the Foxes streaming service is currently one of the least reliable, prone to buffering, freezing, comms/pictures out of sync etc on the circuit; a very serious up-grade will be necessary.
As a non-supporter of Leicestershire, I wouldn't dip in and out of their stream, if a subscription was required. There's plenty of alternatives out there to watch.
A paywall will kill casual, neutral viewers stone dead; they would be better served using advertising on a free, improved streaming service to raise income, if that is the motive.
It was only a couple of years ago that Leicestershire lowered their prices to tempt people back into the ground, and that wasn't a resounding success (from outside looking in), the ground remote, being too far away from central Leicester, being a suggested reason. Throwing-up a paywall to their streaming service is only likely to make Leicestershire CCC more invisible to the Leicester public and ensure they remain largely irrelevant to them. Leicestershire will also risk making themselves invisible and irrelevant to the rest of cricket's Youtube viewers worldwide.
No body wants Leicestershire CCC to become obsolete and irrelevant, do they Mr Jarvis?
81 NOT OUT
ReplyDeleteHow long before Notts CCC start charging for their excellent streaming service?
Or will they go down the advertising revenue route?
Anyone heard any whispers about this subject ?
Something will happen quite soon . It’s blindingly obvious .
Sean Jarvis once again treating members with contempt expecting them to pay twice if for whatever reason they are unable to get down to Grace Road in person. Perhaps they need this money to fund Rahane.
ReplyDelete81 NOT OUT
ReplyDeleteWho will be next to sell out ?
What exactly happens to the money ? R
Does the sole (?) owner of the "club" get it, if sale ratified ? Rob ? Can talk that as a name or a verb, as you choose !
ReplyDeleteRod
DeleteAh a Rod not a Rob, thanks for the steer.
Delete81 NOT OUT
ReplyDeleteQuestion !
If Notts went down the same route as Hampshire ( probably not possible owing to the Clubs Constitution ) then would Lisa and Co share a big payout?
Also what are the implications ( financially) for the Notts Top Table when the 100 Ball comp is sold ? Anyone any idea?
Basically one of the questions that I sent to the club
DeleteI would think they would be in for a big pay day as that's why they all sing from the same hymn sheet, it's the ECB who are desperate to concede this sale as they need to recoup there investment in this second rate competition, but it should be the membership who decide if the club sell any part of the business
ReplyDeleteAs it's the members who own the club, it would be interesting as part of the sale if the top table offered a dividend to the the membership's to conclude this process
As we all know it's all ways only about the money
RIP
ReplyDeleteGraham Thorpe. A great batsman, that is was he was known as, and should be known as now.
Batsman, not "batter" !
ReplyDeleteDon't disagree with the comments from Alfonso Thomas but they are quite happy to accept the handouts from the Hundred.
ReplyDelete81 NOT OUT
ReplyDelete£3.99 per game - or more as time moves on
It soon mounts up into a tidy sum . When will Notts ccc follow suit ?
PS . The way Notts have played this season I don’t think the pay per view audience would be very large!!??
The game at Edgbaston was free for Warwickshire and Worcestershire members to attend whilst Leicestershire were charging their members £20.
ReplyDeleteAll counties should charge NON-MEMBERS for live streams of limited overs and white ball fixtures. They are shooting themselves in the foot allowing non-members to watch a game for free from their armchairs. No other sport is mad enough to offer such a free service, it will costing the counties a fortune in lost gate revenue. Free live streams of county championship matches is much less contentious due to small number of people attending. This I believe is the route to attracting new viewers and potential new members. All members though some be granted free access via a PASSCODE to all home games for all fixtures (white or red)
ReplyDeleteIt would appear that those that did shell out for the Foxes TV livestream were underwhelmed / disappointed by the camera angles, commentary and over all service. Leicestershire fans have voiced their embarrassment at the project on social media. The radio commentary weren't in favour of the pay wall either. As a neutral I wasn't interested in watching for a fee, so I watched the Edgbaston and New Road streams today when I had time. Reading the comments on LCCC's X, I wasn't alone. Only LCCC will know if the experiment was worthwhile, did the subscriptions pay more than what they lost in revenues from Dafabet and Youtube advertising?
Delete3.99 is what I paid for 2 weeks of unlimited live Olympic sport. Half a day of cricket isn't such good value in comparison IMHO
ReplyDeletePosted on Facebook by a Hampshire supporter today
ReplyDeleteYesterday Leicestershire put the quarter final one day match with Hampshire behind a paywall. As a Hampshire fan, despite being a bit annoyed by the advertised cost of £3.99, I wanted to see the match so bit the bullet. The first odd thing was that when I followed the link from the website, the thing was priced in US dollars at 5.11. Anyway, having got so far, I went ahead.
The next annoying thing was the live stream itself, which was of very poor quality. Apart from a mysterious few deliveries from behind the bowler’s arm late in the day, the camera was at an angle of about 45% and a distance, I would guess, of around 100 yards. Sometimes we saw close-ups of batters and bowlers but then lost the overall pitch view.
Ok, it wasn’t much more than the cost of a coffee ( more on that later) and despite the result, (!) was a good game. My point is though really that if county clubs are going to charge for this, they really ought to make sure the quality is decent beforehand and that they’ve got the payment arrangements properly sorted out. The impression given was, I’m afraid, of incompetent, almost shambolic amateurism.
Oh and re the cost- the final insult was, as I had feared, a foreign currency surcharge (12p extra!) on my bank account.