26 February, 2025

Notts CCC 2025 AGM



25/02

Read the annual report, they all read almost word for word from it.

Mick Newell went off piste in what was all part of the hard sell for the women's game, which was the theme for the evening.

If you believe that the most momentous event in Mick Newell's cricketing life, of recent years, was when The Blaze won the Charlotte Edwards Trophy at a deserted County Ground Derby, then you've had too much coffee this morning already - total flannel and I don't believe him. If he's being honest, then he's in the wrong job.

Lisa (it may have been) made the slip saying that The Blaze represented Nottinghamshire, when in actuality Nottinghamshire can't commit fully to the East Midlands side and haven't and nor have The Blaze committed fully to Nottinghamshire and remain the only former regional side not to have made a county commitment. There still remains a Nottinghamshire Girls u18s, seperate to the Blaze Academy side, talk about making it unnecessarily complicated to any aspiring young woman cricketer. Don't forget Nottinghamshire hosts that other elite women's franchise. 

The spin had us told that nearly five thousand attended one women's match last season, but it did fail to mention that there was a street food festival happening at the same venue at the same time. The Blaze are lucky if they get a thousand spectators in stand alone fixtures at any of their home grounds across the East Midlands but Rome wasn't built in a season.

Lisa, suffering from some kind of ailment, and had a demeanour that suited the front stage's green hue.

Answers to any questions were vague, defensive and largely deflected...

Questions with regards to the Hundred sell-off were fobbed off but (now a top table cheerleader) Diana PC , says "they've been working very hard" negotiating with potential partners. No hint of any details were forthcoming or even what the club's lines in the sand were. 

A question from the floor asked why there hadn't been any updates about the pavilion project, which incidentally doesn't have any provision for a museum (surprisingly) - the reply was just a fob-off "contracts were under confidential discussions blah blah - "shut up chidren!" 

We should be getting used to being informed after each event has taken place, this done deal or that done deal...


Two lads with a big hammer could have made more progress, I heard said outside Dixon gates last night. 


Apparently a museum might be included in a phase two of work, in the squash court area.


Electoral Matters:

Graeme Swann, Sue Storey and Andy Afford have been voted on to the GC by the members.

The Nominations Panel recommended a female solicitor for the police, Catherine Hammond.




For fans of Restaurant Six, Lisa's co-conspirator in that Grand Design or should it be Grand Delusion, the then Chair, Richard Tennant, who also was her partner in crime with the whole deception of the what is now called the H*ndred, has been rewarded by the General Committee by being honoured, made President of the club.




Whole evening was beyond redemption from it's self congratulating blandness, but dear old Bill Russell did some degree of salvaging the evening with just two words, "Lady Bay". Will the windfall payments, from those buying into H*ndred stakes, be used in anyway to improve facilities at Lady Bay?

The short answer was yes.



38 comments:

  1. Talk about smoke & mirrors
    I see the MCC route through there
    Nominations process is voted on by there members from a short list of candidates put forward by the panel
    This is a proper way to be transparent & getting the best candidate' not the Notts woke way of waiting to see who comes though the membership vote' so many excellent candidates have been passed by this very poor process

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why on earth do the members and members only vote on direct nominations to the general committee by direct voting via both routes , and each nominations stating they are applying via both routes unlike now

    ReplyDelete
  3. As was our chairman’s route for re election who did not risk the members voting system and chose the nomination route where he was assured of being self selected by the top table ! As will another will this year be it an ex player or a committee member seeking election ! We can all predict those winners

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know one potential committee applicant who is excellent successful businessman, straight talking and life long Nottinghamshire CCC supporter, member and a regular at all matches at Trent bridge and who would put all members views to the committee and CEO but I sadly think he does not fit the top tables easy life ! Very sad

    ReplyDelete
  5. Certainly not a process that's fit for purpose I see the MCC nominations route
    Is that they have a short list of candidates
    & members choose who will be the successful candidate not like Notts with there woke agenda
    again very embarrassing process having a two door policy' never mind that the chairman decided to take
    The nominations route instead of putting himself up through the members route just like other years this as stopped many outstanding
    Candidates from being successful in representing the club ' on another point
    Who will be the new president of the club
    Always somebody who given great service to the club as a player or benefactor / member this year could well be a surprise as this to as also been taken over by the nominations panel'
    I wouldn't be surprised to see
    Nutts the squirrel get the honour as the new president 🤣







    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely not 😳

      Delete
    2. Trent Bridge RecruitmentTuesday, 18 February, 2025

      Can the squirrel nod to anything the CEO says without its head falling off? If so then it gets the job!

      Delete
    3. If certainly seems from within Trent Bridge one woman controls everything 😳 members club and democracy 🤔

      Delete
    4. The great MAN-ipulator

      Delete
  6. 81NOT OUT
    More “ spin” from Notts cccHQ than even in the heady days of Blair’s propaganda chief Alistair Campbell !

    ReplyDelete
  7. Spoiler Alert - thank you for your efforts Stuart.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Everyone.
    Just a very quick message to thank the 173 members who took there time and trust to vote for me for the general Cricket committee.
    I always thought with 3 well known cricketers backed by committee members and ex committee members it was a difficult task plus one committee member standing again.
    As disappointing as it is not to be elected to finish mid table was very encouraging but I genuinely thought I had more to offer than ex cricketers and others on the ballot paper .
    But we live in a democracy and I wish all the new . re-elected and from the nomination panel every success .
    Once again thank you all who voted for me.
    Kind Regards
    Stuart Matthews 🏏

    ReplyDelete
  9. Stuart. There is no honour in being associated with Notts ccc nowdays. But I admire you for trying. Your better off out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Very bland AGM last night. They had clearly spent a long time with PR professionals putting together their presentations, and it seems everything is going to plan, with the growth of the woman's team, the pavilion, and the Hundred. When asked why haven't you communicated more about the the Pavillion and the Hundred like you said you would, the answer was I had to be prudent. Hoping to have the Pavillion ready for early summer 2026, so any delays and that will be two summers without the building. Unable to discuss whether in future more of the Hundred will be sold. Deficit planned for 2025, but didn't say how much. All light and roses, their PR company should get a bonus

    ReplyDelete
  11. And that's it. No further real communication or consultation with members till the next PR based AGM.
    Give me and fellow ex members local cricket anytime. Renews? No mention. Not surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  12. So two ex-players and a lady who is "passionate about the Hundred" then. What does all this mean? Is it good or bad news?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it' not fantastic, Fantastic. Neither of the ex players could manage to attend the evening, even when knowing they'd won the vote. How many meetings on a wet and windy Thursday will they manage to talk about Lord knows what trivia, one wonders. It doesn't bode well. Graeme Swann the next Chair???? They're daft enough and members voted for him, so he'll be popular(????).

      Delete
  13. If anyone has the numbers of votes for each candidate please could they post them. My apologies for not being there to thank those who voted for me and encouraged me, but I was in A&E with my 97 yo mother who had fallen down the stairs. She's just bruised, I'm glad to say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andy Afford 635
      Graeme Swann 595
      Sue Storey 515
      Nick Evans 425
      Usman Afzaal 405
      Sarah Parkinson 298
      Stuart Matthews 173
      Steve Battlemuch 116
      Jess Maguire 91
      The number of votes cast for Richard Reed was never announced

      Delete
    2. Richard Reid 41 to complete the picture

      Delete
  14. I missed the first part of the so called AGM on zoom due an unfortunate accident but did anyone see the club membership numbers and was any mention made of them.
    Thank you in anticipation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not that I heard. We were subjected to death 😳 by bar graph but there wasn't a chart of membership numbers year on year unfortunately😳

      Delete
    2. Page 51 of the accounts list the total number of members. The numbers went up from 5605 in 2023 to 6028 in 2024

      Delete
    3. Turn out for the GC election was worse than for local government elections, always is, but why if these people care about the club? Does the voting need to go electronic now so folk can instantly vote on their phones?

      Delete
    4. 6028 members, yet the winning candidate only gets 10% (and me and others even less). One of my targets for this year is to increase turn-out for next year. Suggestions welcome. Electronic voting may be one.

      Delete
    5. Nick the turn out is higher than 10 percent, remember junior members cannot vote. However no matter which way you look at it the turn out is and remains poor. Many members only join for the Test and have no real interest in Notts CCC

      Delete
  15. 81 NOT OUT
    Seems to be Much ado about Nothing !
    Everyone seems to get an easy ride these days .
    What happened to all the angry young men ? Can’t folk be bothered these days to get involved and seriously question the Powers that be? Everything seems to be smoke and mirrors these days involving the politburo . Straightforward questions appear not to get straightforward answers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe the "angry young men" aren't members anymore so wouldn't have been able to vote or attend last night. Apathy is starting to rule though.

      Delete
    2. I fear that that is the where some people are steering supporters, by design. They want repeat ticket purchasers not members ultimately. I've recently heard two statements from different R*cket "supporters", (one was at the AGM) both were unhappy about the ticket buying process. That, it appears is the only thing that bothers them.

      Delete
    3. I tried, and will try again. I'm angry but definitley not young!!

      Delete
  16. Unfortunately, there were no young men, angry or not, there last night. I would estimate around 150-170 there and the average age probably 60-65. Then agree very much a smoke and mirrors job with, the Blaze being mentioned at least five times, Luke fletcher at least three times, and McCann the same, so very much about transition, and only a couple of sentences from Newell admitting how badly the Mens team had played. Even the question about the future of the museum was not really answered, just a general comment that we will spread the memorabilila around the new pavilion

    ReplyDelete
  17. ADMIN NOTE: Does Nottsview need to restrict comments to those using accounts recognised by Google as there are too many confusing Anonymous threads going on simitaneously? If you've got something valid to say, put your name to it! Currently, some comments have bypassed the signed-in users URL option by filling the field with random stuff and have then ignored the password field, which works well as far I'm concerned but more need to use that option. A gold star for Kevin and Mike in this thread for example. What do others think? I will be asking again in a post of its own perhaps before the season starts to set some ground rules, as it were. Dave

    ReplyDelete
  18. Going back to the AGM this week and in particular the new pavilion development which we were shown basically just a front and back view mick up images with no internal mock photos of anything from changing rooms , hospitality areas . Long room etc surely these are standard items in the planning approval documents!
    Then we learn we have what £6 million in the bank etc ! We owe £4.8 million to the local councils .
    There was a brief mention of the builders contracted but I have failed to locate them and no explanation was made if there experience in this area .
    Then there was no mention of the contract value with contingencies!
    A project Over 2 years with prices rising months and when Lisa was asked she briefly mentioned when asked what money we will receive from the 100 and when will we receive it plus do we need it for the pavilion costs !
    I hope not but as A MEMBERS CLUB We deserve and should be told these figures they are not confidential as Lisa likes to say , I can honestly see as a businessman financial troubles without the 100 money plus help from the ECB or further bank loans
    Just my view From
    Stuart Matthews

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was all kept very vague and they swiftly moved on as though we didn't need to know.

      Delete
  19. As she seemed quite ill I didn't ask the question at the AGM but followed up with an email to Lisa asking about Executive membership and the Executive lounge for 2026. I go a very nicely worded reply from Michael Temple basically saying it was too early in the process and that they are still looking at options for the allocation of rooms. Really dont buy that, as in the planning there would have to be structure in place to support a supporters lounge, like bars, seating, food prep, so my take is no Executive membership going forward. .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think for most supporters the lack of planning for a museum was the greater concern at the AGM. Perhaps phase 2 with an Executive Suite in the new squash court area will be provided.

      Delete
    2. I've duplicated this comment on to a fresher post about membership.

      Delete

Please share your thoughts, but if you're using the anonymous option, please leave a name in the comments (to avoid confusion). Thanks.