Day 4
DOGGED RESISTANCE FROM YOUTH NOT ENOUGH
After "The Catastrophe Cavaliers" effectively hand Bears a win
After fighting so hard for ten sessions, Notts slipped to a disappointing and self-inflicted 170 run defeat against Warwick at sunny Edgbaston with 8.3 overs remaining. With a draw very much to Notts liking, they somewhat foolishly went for a win chasing a distant 309 target at 4.18 RPO. This after Warwick seemingly happy for the draw themselves added 63 in 19.1 overs before being all out, the outstanding Fletcher collecting a further 4 wIckets. Notts simply threw their wickets away on the slow pitch and had lost half their team inside 27 overs. Credit should be given to the inexperienced duo James and Patterson-White for grafting for 106 and 61 balls respectively; but with a long tail the damage had already been done. Slow left armer Danny Briggs taking 4 for 38 off 24.3 overs. Slater, Duckett and Mullaney were all culpable for their own dismissals, Clarke was clearly thought out being stumped off a leg side delivery from Hannon-Dalby which Burgess smartly stumped standing up. Moores was seemingly bowled without playing a shot to a straight ball.
Chappell (City End) and Paterson (Pavilion End)opened the bowling, but after a three over spell Chappell made way for Mullaney. Burgess and Briggs brought up the 100 partnership in 191 balls with a single off Patterson-White who was introduced in the 76th over. Burgess was dismissed later in the same over for 80 caught by Mullaney at first slip after the former Sussex attempted a sweep, 237 for seven. The new ball was taken with Warwick 249 for seven off 80 overs. A run out mix up with Chappell bowling saw Miles run out at the non striker’s end as Slater threw down the stumps direct from cover, 250 for 8 in the 81st over. Fletcher came on the following over. Briggs got to his 50 with a boundary through mid wicket off Fletcher. Next ball Briggs (50) played onto the Bomber, 259 for nine. Liam Norwell was bowled off stump to the rampant Fletcher for 0. Warwickshire 264 all out off 85.1 overs, Hannon-Dalby 4 not out. Fletcher with figures of 4f or 38 was leader of the pack once more.
Notts required 309 off 74 overs at 4.18 RPO, a seemingly impossible target on the sluggish, albeit with clear blue skies offering the best batting conditions of the contest. In the fourth over a brisk delivery from Norwell found the edge of Hameed's (2) bat as keeper Burgess took the catch, eight for one in the 4th over. Briggs bowled the last over before lunch, Notts 34 for one off 8 overs at the interval with Slater on18 and Duckett on 14.
The dreadful dismissals continued as Moores shouldered arms to Rhodes (City End) and lost his off stump, the third Notts batsman to go this way in the game, 123 for 6 in 43rd over. James (19) survived 107 balls before departing caught behind to Briggs, attempting a cut shot, 129 for seven. Patterson-White on 10 was dropped by Hain at second slip off a ball shot up from Norwell, a regulation chance. Yates bowled a single over of off spin to allow Briggs and Norwell to change ends. Bizarrely Yates then reappeared this time from the City End for the 55th over so Briggs and Norwell could switch ends once more. Chappell surrounded by close fielders was caught at silly point by Hain off Briggs for one, 135 for eight after 60 overs.With 12 overs remaining Norwell had a rest and on came Miles, who with his second ball bowled Patterson-White for 11, 136 for 9. Fletcher was last man to fall bowled by Briggs for one, Notts 138 all out off 65.3 overs at 1742. Much credit for Warwickshire for never giving an inch during the game, but this was a very much a game thrown away from a Notts prospective, a defeat they may regret come mid July. The Bears had therefore doubled Notts in two games where Notts should not have lost. Notts now go to Essex without Hammed and with the home track sure to favour Mr Harmer. Notts, who should have remained top of the table with a bit more tactical nous, are now five points behind Essex as they slip to second. MAG
Day 3
Dank
Fourteen balls after lunch, Fletcher (2) was strangled down the leg side and caught by Burgess as Rhodes picked up his second wicket, 277 for nine. Paterson launched Briggs for six over long on. Patterson -White (36) who had batted well edged an attempted reverse sweep off Briggs to keeper Burgess, Notts 297 all out off 95.2 overs. Dane Paterson 8 not out. Norwell 4 for 64.
Hello sunshine
Chappell (City End) picked up the second wicket when Malan was caught by Patterson-White in the covers for 6, 95 for 2 after 25 overs. The boisterous Brummie crowd of around 1500 cheered the Bears hundred in the 28th over. Chappell got one to lift and he found Hain's (5) edge and Moores took the catch, 113 for three in the 33rd over. Chappell was on fire and he removed Rhodes (63) off bail , 116 for 4 in the 35th over. Six overs later, Paterson replaced Chappell who bowled 3 for 22 in eight overs in his second spell. After 16 overs on the bounce (1 for 26) Patterson-White was replaced at the Pavilion End by Luke Fletcher, Moores standing up to the stumps. With his second ball the crowd was silenced as Lamb departed leg before for 7, 134 for five. Bresnan went for a four ball quack, caught behind by Moores as Fletcher got his second in the over, 134 for six. Fletcher then had to go off for running repairs on a nose bleed. Burgess went on the offensive hitting Paterson for three boundaries in the 47th over. Paterson proved expensive as Burgess and Briggs were proving difficult to remove, Chappell returned with 12 overs remaining and the next over Mullaney had his first bowl of the innings. The 50 partnership between Burgess and Briggs only took 74 balls. Burgess reached his 50 off 75 balls. Mullaney only gave himself two overs before switching ends to the City End. Patterson-White returned from the Pavilion End. Warwick closed on 201 for 6 off 66 overs with Burgess on 61 and Briggs on 16. The game ebb and flowed all day, as both teams traded blows and gave nothing away. Expect the same tomorrow. MAG
Another hard fought day In Birmingham saw Notts close 168 runs behind with seven first innings wickets still standing. Notts successfully achieved maximum bowling points as the outstanding Paterson finished with five wickets. But frustratingly on the sluggish surface Norwell and Hannon-Dalby added 52 for the last wicket to get the Bears a third batting point and an eventual total of 341. Some over zealous umpiring saw 10 overs needlessly lost out of day as a play was held up twice for extremely light rain. Notts though batted well with Hameed and Slater adding 72 for the first wicket. Slater eventually made 77 until perhaps overdoing his aggression a bit fell to catch behind off Norwell who picked up all three wickets to fall. Clarke looking fluent throughout hit an unbeaten 48 as stumps were drawn at 1903 with Notts on 173 for three.
In the fourth over of the morning, Paterson (Pavilion End) picked up his fourth wicket when Briggs (7) edged to Moores who took a fine diving catch to his right, 262 for seven. In the 105th over, Fletcher picked up a deserved wicket when he had Miles (2) caught low down by Slater at backward point, 277 for eight. Norwell hit Fletcher for a six over long off. Lamb's excellent innings of 67 ended as he was caught by substitute Brett Hutton at second slip off Paterson, 289 for nine. A cover driven four by Hannon-Dalby off Paterson saw Warwick to 300 off the last ball of the 110th over. Patterson-White replaced Paterson for the 112th over. Chappell came on from the City End for the following over. Norwell hit Patterson-White for a six over mid wicket as he became increasingly aggressive. A six over long on by Hannon-Dalby off Paterson brought up the 50 partnership for the last wicket off 58 balls. Mullaney came on for the disappointing Chappell for the 119th over. Hannon-Dalby was finally dismissed for 26 as Mullaney took a smart slip catch low to his left off Patterson-White. The last wicket had added 52 runs with Warwickshire 341 all out off 119.1 overs with Liam Norwell 30 not out. Paterson the stand out bowler with 5 for 90.
Hannon-Dalby (City End) and Norwell (Pavilion End) opened the as Notts faced three overs before lunch. Notts 6 for 0 at the interval with Hameed on 5 and Slater on 1.
Both Notts openers looked solid after lunch, Rhodes turned to Bresnan for the tenth over. Light rain was falling for 15 or so minutes before the umpires called a halt at 1425 with Notts 28 for 0 off 13.3 overs with Slater on 15 and Hameed on 13.
Play recommenced at 1530 with four overs lost. The 50 stand between Hameed and Slater was achieved in the 21st over. Hannon-Dalby completed an eleven spell from the City End and was replaced by Craig Miles. With Notts 60 for 0 after 27 overs, Norwell returned. Very light rain stopped play once more at 1635 with Notts 72 for 0 off 29 overs with Hameed on 39 and Slater on 33.
Play resumed at 1700, with another six overs lost, and off the second ball of the resumption Hameed shouldered arms and was bowled by Norwell for 39, 72 for one. Off the last ball of the 34th over, Duckett (4) shuffling across his crease was adjudged leg before wicket to Norwell, 78 for two. A pulled four through square leg by Clarke off Norwell brought up the Notts 100 after 38 overs. Next over Miles replaced Hannon-Dalby from the City End and a legside room for Slater brought his half ton off 117 balls. The following over Briggs came on with his slow left arm. Notts were accelerating, Clarke pulling Miles for a square leg six. Rhodes came on for the first time for the 47th over but only bowled two overs as Norwell switched to the City End and was promptly pulled twice to boundary ropes and once over the ropes by Slater in the same over. Norwell got his revenge in the following over as Slater (77 off 160 balls, 11x4, 1x6) edged to keeper Burgess, 156 for three in the 53rd over. With four overs remaining Hannon-Dalby returned but no more wickets fell. Notts closed on 173 for 3 off 60 overs with Clarke on 48 and James on 4.
Sunshine tomorrow?
The crowd was significantly less than Thursday's 1800 attendance. The weather was disappointing with the sun only apparent early on and also made a late appearance in the evening session. Neither team has given the opposition much room and the game has been keenly fought and evenly poised. Both teams deserve credit for how they have batted and bowled.during the first two days. Better weather is forecast for the weekend. MAG
Day 1
SUMMER ARRIVES AT EDGBASTON
Honours end even at the close
A late three wicket burst from Dane Paterson allowed Notts to restore parity as Warwick closed on 250 for 6 after being inserted on a slow pitch with some lateral movement at Edgbaston.Missed chances
In the fifth over of the day, Rhodes on 6 was dropped by Moores off Fletcher. Fletcher was again extremely unlucky not to pick up a wicket in his first spell of 6 4 2 0 with Rhodes also surviving a confident leg before shout. Chappell bowled with pace with the new ball,but didn't carry the same threat as Fletcher. Pattinson and James replaced the opening pair. In his first over James removed Yates' (8) off stump, 32 for one off 14 overs. The Bears 50 came up in the 21st over via a boundary for Rhodes off Paterson. Fletcher returned in the 23rd over and had Malan dropped on 2 by Duckett who immediately went off injured with a dislocated finger. Shades of Sibley at Trent Bridge. Mullaney came on from the Pavilion End for the 26th over. Malan was leg before for 17 to the skipper off the last ball before lunch 78 for 2 off 28 overs, Rhodes on 49.
Warwick scored 85 runs in the middle session. Rhodes reached his 50 off 90 balls in the first over after lunch with a boundary off Fletcher . In the 35th over Chappell replaced Fletcher. Rhodes and Hain were bedding in with Warwick passing 100 in the 41st over. After a nine over spell (9 2 19 1) either side of lunch, Mullaney replaced himself with James. The following over saw the return of Paterson. A four for Hain off James brought up the 50 partnership in 122 balls. Patterson-White came on from the Pavilion End in the 49th over. No breakthrough looked forthcoming so Fletcher returned for the 57th over. The next over the Warwick 150 came up. On the stroke of tea , Rhodes (91) was caught at short leg by Hameed off Patterson-White. Warwickshire at tea on 163 for three off 63.2 overs with Hain on 28.
Paterson came on bowling straight after tea from the City End but was replaced by James for the 75th over. The new ball was taken by Fletcher and Chappell with Warwick 200 for three after 80 overs. Hain got to his 50 off 159 balls and the 50 partnership between Lamb and himself took 122 balls. After a disappointing three over spell with the second new ball Chappell made way for Paterson. Hain's 179 ball vigil ended as he was leg before to Paterson for 61, 238 for 4 in the 90th over. In his next over Patterson had Burgess leg before for three, 244 for 5. Mullaney came on in the 93rd over. Paterson was on fire now, having Bresnan caught at third slip by Hameed for 0, 248 for 6. Stumps were drawn at 1832 with Warwick 250 for 6 off 96 overs with Lamb on 43 and Briggs on 0.
A fascinating day of cricket where Notts bowled generally well without much luck. Let's hope Duckett is fit to bat. MAG
As predicted, the squad Peter has announced is:
Haseeb Hameed
Ben Duckett
This fixture is a test event for 25% capacity attendance, so plenty of scope for away supporters to make it over to Birmingham having booked their seats.
Haseeb Hameed has been called into the England squad as cover for the games against New Zealand starting at the beginning of next month and will join the England squad camp after this game.
ReplyDeleteBrett Hutton would i imagine would be the logical replacement for SB, Although a case could be made for any of the three mentioned
above to take the vacant spot, Fletch take a rest? Well i guess it could happen,But can you imagine what his thoughts would be on
that given his present form.
Don't think I would rest Fletch, unless injury niggle.
ReplyDeleteWe have 2 Championship matches then Blast, where he could have a rest for some of the matches, then back for July CCs.
Hutton I think, bowled well in early games and at York by all accounts.
How is Jake ? Hope he is recovering well, we will certainly need him A lot of cricket to come.
I would play Joey in the Blast, feel his all round game, including quick silver fielding, just the job.
Also Matt C, LPW is doing well, but to me is an attacking bowler. In T20 Samit and Matthew quite a combination.
For T20, I'd expect the following:
ReplyDelete1. Hales 2. Duckett 3. Clarke 4. Moores+ 5. Trego 6. Christian* 7. Mullaney 8. Patel 9. Carter 10. Ball 11. Paterson
And would prefer the following:
1. Hales 2. Evison 3. Clarke 4. Duckett 5. Moores+ 6. Christian* 7. James 8. Patterson-White 9. Patel 10. Carter 11. Paterson
Heard talk that Imad is in the country but PSL rearrangement might scupper that.
DeleteMax - your T20 side .
ReplyDeleteNo Mullaney?
Surely as a big hitter and a canny bowler ( same as Christian) he must be in the Blast side?
I know Mullaney will be in there, just personally I'd rather look to the future with James - Mullaney has been a bit more expensive in recent years and his bowling is less needed with 3 spinners
ReplyDeleteI'm a bit lukewarm about Ben Compton, I'd rather chance Liam or Lyndon opening and brought Joey into the team.
ReplyDeleteOr open with Slater and Duckett and bring Joey in ?
ReplyDeleteDoes this mean Hameed will miss 2 matches ! Still, pleased for him.
No need Ken and Rich. Notts website says he joins the England squad after the Warwick fixture.
DeleteAh that is good and fair from England.
ReplyDeleteJust Zak in for Stuart then. Interesting decision to bowl first, weather getting better during match, at least forecast says ! So maybe based on that, pitch a factor I clearly don't know about.
Are umpires more reluctant to play in very light rain this season?
ReplyDeleteThe Worcester game was delayed on several occasions by precipitation that only warranted a quick running over with the rope when it had ceased 100%.
I see that the hover and no sheeting is on at Edgbaston today, much like Trent Bridge last week. Spectators are there primarily to watch cricket not the covers.
I think umpires with a few exceptions all tend to be keen to stay in the pavilion!
ReplyDeleteWas it old Umpire Dickie Bird ( a stickler for crucket protocol) who would take the players off the moment three drops of rain fell onto his pristine white umpiring cap ! Also the moment a black cloud appeared anywherecin the sky the light meters would be out and the game held up with the crowd often slow hand clapping. A great Umpire for knowing all the rules and was a good judge of LBW calls . But he seemed quite happy to be the centre of attention on and off the field . He famously said that as a life long bachelor he was “ married” to cricket. Probably the most famous and well known Umpire there has ever been ? . Still alive and kicking “ up North” in Gods own County.
ReplyDeleteAbsolute pain in the bum he was CruetKing. Good umpires should not be noticed, not wanting to be centre of attention.
DeleteHe certainly will applaud some of these modern umpires who just love to get off the field.
It was a day of shame and a disgrace and insult to the members and spectators
ReplyDeleteThis is my Twitter offering
"1. Having been locked out from cricket we survived the icy blasts last week at Trent Bridge. We went to Edgbaston yesterday and today.
2.Early afternoon socially distanced drops of water came down, not enough to show signs on the concrete. We sat out not wet at all, while the umpires removed the players, then it happened again.
This would not have happened in T20 or the 100 balls up. Youngsters would probably have been put off by this. Do ECB and counties want us to watch red ball cricket? Doesnt seem like it. Umps Lloyd/Warren"
The assembled were a dwindling band of die hards who arent getting younger. The comments in the "crowd" were scathing and the least vocal were stating that this was a disgrace.
Quite simply wind this 10 to 15 years on and there wont be 100 spectators and none below the the age of 60.That will reflect on the numbers at test cricket. The question is will either be viable.
This may seem negative, but I believe realistic.
The play which did happen was conducted at a slow pace on a wicket offering little and of an easy pace. The ECB sit in their ivory towers and dream of new schemes to attract people while allowing the red ball game to wither.
Phil Cooper
Similar intolerance to a few drips last week at Trent Bridge ...
DeleteIt begs the question -
DeleteAre some Umpires much happier sitting in the Pavilion trying to count the drops of rain that may be falling?
Is a spot of rain falling a red mist alert for most Umpires to stop further play regardless of its intensity?
“ the 100 balls up” good un
ReplyDeleteIf Duckett is injured and handicapped as Girdler suggests, why the heck would he be batting at 3 with 300 runs to score?
ReplyDeletePoor decision making by management/captain and poor shot selections by senior players, on top of poor game play - where was the the partnership building, wearing the bowlers down early on in the innings, ready for a chase after tea? Well played Lyndon and Liam for sticking to the task of hanging on to 8 points, but the cards were stacked against them after the early wickets - too many and too early. Congratulations Warwick.
very poor performance - the test will be the next game, which will show how much progress we have really made
ReplyDeleteNotts in one day mode would have loved this chase, The target seemed within range with ample overs to reach it, Sadly it was not the Notts one day team that attempted the chase,but their headless chicken cousins Not for the first time when we were faced with a pressure situation we fell apart, As the post above mentions surely the logical approach would have been to bat sensibly until tea than review your position. But that would be rational, Something we don't seem to do!
ReplyDeleteNext up its Essex,No doubt thirsting for revenge,There will be changes Hameed is away with England,Perhaps too a return for Brett Hutton.It might be a match too early for Jake Ball, Given also this is Harmers back yard you do wonder if Notts might draft in an extra spinner.
No bashing from me.
ReplyDeleteYes, a bad day, after 3 pretty even ones, and following 3 victories.
Boy, we owe those Bears one on 11th. Not revenge, just sweet victory !
No doubt about it . We should have got a draw. Top order need to grow up.
ReplyDeleteThree Notts batsmen out shouldering arms ! For goodness sake why are you holding a bat!?
Very curate's egg that but disappointingly poor in the last innings. Not yet clear which team is the real one. I thought the second morning when they were 250 odd for 6 was a real litmus test. The mob of 2016, the second half of 2017 and 2018/19/20 would have ushered them along to 400. The team of the previous three matches would have rolled them over for 300. Of course perhaps predictably as they are, hopefully, a team on the turn they opted for schizophrenia - knocked over the first three and then let Mr Hannon-Dolby (career average 7) put on 50 to get them to a par score or just under. Plenty of good signs again but overall we lost all the big moments when the match was there to be grabbed and some of the bellwethers of a poor team reared up again - the last wicket stand, sizeably too many extras contributing to their first innings score, dropped catches and especially the lack of gumption in the last innings. Let no-one also doubt Stuart Broad's contribution to the team's intensity now we have played one without him. Big test at Chelmsford requiring real focus, purpose, intelligence and sheer bloodymindedness. Come on Notts.
ReplyDelete