The independent Cricket Discipline Commission (CDC) has issued its sanctions decision in relation to Heather Knight after she was charged over a non-recent photograph which appeared on social media.
Ms Knight admitted a breach of ECB Directive 3.3 which stated at the time of the offence in 2012: “No such person may conduct himself in a manner or do any act or omission which may be prejudicial to the interests of cricket or which may bring the game of cricket or any Cricketer or group of Cricketers into disrepute.”
CDC adjudicator Tim O’Gorman issued Ms Knight with a reprimand and a £1,000 fine, which is suspended for two years.
The full judgment is available here.
“In this case, Ms Knight’s behaviour was discriminatory and offensive, however the Cricket Discipline Commission (CDC) accepted there was no racist intent in her conduct. I welcome her acknowledgment of the potential impact of her behaviour, and her unreserved apology.
“In determining its sanction, the CDC also considered that the offence happened 12 years ago, that Ms Knight was 21 at the time, and that she had received little education on such matters at the time. There was significant testimony about the positive role model she has been, her voluntary work and the positive influence she has had on players from different ethnicities and backgrounds. I hope this will continue throughout her time in the sport.
“The Cricket Regulator will continue to prioritise tackling racism and discrimination. We are committed to investigating allegations that are raised with us thoroughly and rigorously, whether recent or in the past. Anyone who has experienced discrimination in cricket can contact us by emailing diversity.matters@cricketregulator.co.uk.”
Evie Ashton.
BBC Sport.
Monday, 22 July 2024.
PTG 4566-22026.
More photos on Facebook
BBC News,
Friday, 16 February 2024.
PTG 4433-21527.
PTG Editor.
Wednesday, 14 February 2024.
PTG 4432-21521.
The Cricketer Magazine.
Friday, 9 February 2024.
PTG 4428-21504.
Meg Lay has etched her name into the history books as the first female grounds person to join the staff at Lord’s. The 27-year-old New Zealander has spent the past two years working on the ground staff at Gloucestershire and was the only female member of a grounds team on the circuit of international venues in England and Wales when she helped prepare the pitch for England Women's One Day International against South Africa two Julys ago.
Since then, she has blazed a trail through the male-dominated industry – a report commissioned by the Grounds Management Association (GMA) in 2019 found that women accounted for just three percent of the sport turf industry – going on to win the newcomer of the year award at 2023 GMA Awards and forming part of an all-female ground staff team during the Women's Ashes Twenty20 International played at Edgbaston last year.
Posting on X (formerly Twitter), Lay said: "Not sure I'll ever get my head around this one. Words don't quite do it justice how excited I am to be joining the ground team at Lord's at the end of the month”. Speaking last year, Lay, who played age-group cricket for Canterbury in New Zealand, explained how she moved to Bristol in 2023 and planned to find casual work to support her travelling. With no expectation of getting the role, she applied for a groundskeeper position at Gloucestershire "because I thought it'd be fun to do a summer”.
However, after her application proved successful, she has since described it as "the best job in the world", although the lack of women in the industry did take her by surprise. "I knew there were no women at Gloucestershire but I didn't realise it was male-dominated”, she said. "With the growth of women's cricket, you would think there would be a lot of women on the ground staff as well. For there not to be any others… it should be fifty-fifty. It's such a good job, and I'd love more women to put their hand up. I want to make sure that I'm visible so that people can see that there is a pathway here. In my experience, everyone has been great. If people see that I'm doing it, they feel like they can as well”.
Matt Roller.
Cricinfo.
Saturday, 27 January 2024.
PTG 4418-21468.
BBC Sport.
Saturday, 20 January 2024.
PTG 4410-21430.
Ben Rumsby.
London Daily Telegraph.
Wednesday, 17 January 2024.
PTG 4406-21415.
Editorial.
Melbourne Age.
Wednesday, 3 January 2024.
PTG 4391-21353.
Like church and state, the prevailing sentiment is that politics and sport should remain separate. This separation has been crucial to upholding the purity of athletic competition and ensuring that, at its best, the playing field offers an opportunity for all people, from all walks of life, to share a space that is free of the many issues that can divide us off the field. Yet, history has shown us that there are moments when the intersection of sport and politics becomes inevitable.
It should not be surprising, then, that the war in Gaza, which has understandably ignited much passion and protest, should find its way onto the sporting field. One of the leading Test batsmen in the world and the first Muslim to play cricket for Australia, Usman Khawaja has been vocal about how the deaths of so many children in Gaza have affected him deeply. In a bid to highlight the plight of Palestinians, Khawaja proposed wearing shoes during the first Test in Perth with the words:“Freedom is a human right” and “All lives are equal”. The International Cricket Council (ICC) put paid to that idea, insisting that his shoes were a political statement under its guidelines and therefore banned (PTG 4371-21271, 14 December 2023).
While Khawaja chose not to defy the ICC by wearing the shoes, he did take to the field with a black armband, which earned him a Code of Conduct charge from the cricket body (PTG 4378-21305, 22 December 2023). Not to be put off, Khawaja made a fresh application to the ICC to adorn his shoes with an image of a black dove holding an olive branch during the Boxing Day Test. This was also rejected. Again he complied, but unwilling to completely put up the white flag, he went to the crease with the names of his daughters on his shoes (PTG 4383-21323, 25 December 2023).
Cricket understandably wants to prevent its players becoming billboards for causes that may conflict with its own values. It is reasonable that the ICC guards these things closely. And The Age acknowledges that although the symbols Khawaja has proposed have not been overtly pro-Palestinian, there can be no doubt about the message he is trying to send. But at a time when others are using extreme and polarising tactics to spread their message over Gaza, such as lurid displays of fake dead bodies outside the offices of Members of Parliament and disrupting events such as Carols by Candlelight, we should be grateful there are people like Khawaja who clearly hold strong views but are determined to express them in a moderate and respectful way.
As Khawaja himself pointed out in his submission to the ICC, other cricketers have been allowed to play with symbols on their bat without sanction. Marnus Labuschagne had a Bible verse, Nicholas Pooran had a cross and Keshav Maharaj a Hindu symbol. Surely a dove on a player’s bat carries no greater potential to offend.
Khawaja has put forward strong arguments for his actions to the ICC and Cricket Australia, which supports the Test batsman. Unlike a politician, journalist or corporate leader, whose public words on such issues have a direct impact on their work or that of their organisations, Khawaja’s stand will not affect his ability to see off the new ball at the Sydney Cricket Ground on Wednesday. And it will not, in the eyes of any fair-minded person, call into question the integrity of any cricketing body that approves it.
PTG Editor.
Sunday, 24 December 2023.
Over five years after its original announcement about the matter, Cricket Australia (CA) has again moved to recruit female match referees, and applications to take part in the program have already been received. The national body is offering the opportunity for "up to four females" to participate in its Match Referee Talent Pathway Program, the initial phase of which will run from mid-January through to the end of March, those chosen receiving "a small honorarium in recognition of the time they invest during the program”,
In an understandable move given the nature of the issue, requests for Expressions of Interest (EOI) in the program were circulated earlier this month via an ‘internal’ process that included CA and State and Territory Associations' own structures and systems. The deadline for submissions was last Sunday and it is understood EOIs from over 20 individuals had been received by that time. The successful applicants are expected to be notified early in the New Year.
CA says those chosen will be provided with a "structured development program, mentoring, management support, access to training materials, and match observation opportunities alongside current match referees". They will be supported as they train and prepare to potentially become a member of CA’s match referees’ panel in the future. The intention in the first phase of the program in January-March is for participants to only officiate within the State that they reside, however, should travel interstate be needed, all necessary travel and associated costs will be provided by CA.
Those who submitted EOIs “must”, said the call for submissions, have: Knowledge of professional cricket; Demonstrated leadership experience; Experience in stakeholder management; Knowledge of cricket Laws, Playing Conditions, Policies, and interpretations; Ability to maintain a professional demeanour when interfacing with colleagues, players, and support staff; Ability to work in a fast-paced and pressured environment; Collaborative team player; A self-starter attitude and proactive nature; Proficient with administration tasks and report writing; Sound IT skills; while a knowledge of umpiring skills and techniques is "highly desirable”.
Many of those 'must haves' suggest that only individuals who have either played the women’s game at international level, or at minimum have considerable experience in CA’s domestic women’s T20 or 50 over competitions, are likely to make up the four who are eventually chosen.
Stuff New Zealand.
Tuesday, 20 December 2023.
PTG 4376-21292.
PTG Editor.
Saturday, 11 November 2023.
PTG 4339-21142.
Stuff New Zealand.
Wednesday, 8 November 2023.
PTG 4337-21134.
Nick Hoult.
London Daily Telegraph.
Thursday, 2 November 2023.
PTG 4329-21095.
Seven new WBBL umpires, two of them women, and an uncle-nephew pairing.
PTG Editor
Melbourne Age.
Thursday, 19 October 2023.
PTG 4318-21056.
17/10
Black History Month at Trent Bridge
Pakistan’s female umpires again limited to fourth umpire roles in women’s ‘A' series.
PTG Editor.
Wednesday, 18 October 2023.
PTG 4316-21049.
Code Sports.
Monday, 16 October 2023.
PTG 4315-21044.
Sydney Sixers captain Ellyse Perry will be watching Thursday’s Women’s Big Bash League (WBBL) season opener from the sidelines as she serves her one-match suspension for slow over rates during the 2022-23 season. Perry was handed the ban after the Sixers were one over behind during their loss to the Strikers in last year’s final in early December, however, it was the side’s third such offence of that season which meant under WBBL Playing Conditions it automatically triggered the skipper’s suspension PTG 4064-19950, 6 December 2022)
Perry is one of the competition’s biggest draw cards and not having her involved in the first game of the season is a blow for crowds and stakeholders. The Sixers did not formally appeal the decision as they were behind on their overs. However, they did dispute with Cricket Australia (CA) the ability for a ban to carry over from a previous season. CA confirmed they are content with the decision given it is clearly stated in the Playing Conditions. Perry said simply: “It’s in the competition rules”.
Alistair Dobson, Cricket Australia’s BBL general manager said: “We’d love to have her out there, she’s awesome and in great form at the moment. But we operate within a competition that has rules and regulations and it’s an unfortunate by-product of last season”. Perry’s teammates were also fined $A250 (£UK130) each for their third infringement in the final – a large discrepancy to the captain’s one-game ban. No details have been released about the two occasions Perry’s side was censured for slow over-rates.
At the risk of being banished, there is no such thing as "black history", only history. The events that shape history happen to all of us, to say otherwise is deeply to misunderstand everything. By the same reasoning, there is no such thing as
ReplyDelete"black cricket". To any charge of racism, I plead not guilty.
There are many different perspectives of history Rich. They say that past wars are always seen through the lens of the eyes of the victors.
DeleteAfter all, who discovered America? It wasn't Columbus or even Leif Erikson, as there was already people living there when they both arrived, but we were always taught something from the European perspective.
With Black History Month we're back to equity rather than equality. For example: at least two generations of school kids have now been taught about Mary Seacole on an equal footing with Florence Nightingale (if not more prominently), whereas, I'd never heard of the person until my own kids went to primary school. It's just about education and awareness Rich.
There are many histories. The history of racism and slavery and colonialism and the very system of capitalism that was built by it IS our history - it is British history just as much as Nelson and Trafalgar. The history of slave revolts in Haiti and Jamaica are part of our working class history also. All are worthy of being immersed in. And very good too
Delete80 NOT OUT
DeleteCOMMENTING ON THIS THREAD- is like treading on eggshells.
No matter what is said - someone will take it the wrong way
That’s how it is now in the UK in 2023
Are they trying to erase slavery from history? Wouldn't it be better to remember it, learn from it and move on from it? Do we not have a more diverse community in the 21st century as an almost direct result of slavery?
DeleteSadly, Yorkshire is no longer a cricket club.
ReplyDeleteMore a gallery pleasing political organisation.
Their mission "to be inclusive". No longer to be County Champions.
This, re Warner Stand is utterly pathetic. He had nothing to do with slavery, nobody is liable for what someone in the family did, or msy have done. Yet again, walking all over cricket history.
ReplyDeleteChris Guest -the Blaze’s Head Coach, spoke about this last Thursday at Notts Cricket 🏏 Lovers
ReplyDeleteWould like to add how well both himself and player Marie Kelly spoke on this night
Really enjoyed seeing The Blaze last season and there’s now a bonus 4 home 🏡 games at Trent Bridge this season that’s covered in your membership subscriptions making it even greater value for money 💴
Very welcome addition a female grounds person -forget the terminology that goes with everything these days, our game has to appeal to a more diverse audience to continue to thrive and grow going forwards
ReplyDeleteThink she should be ‘loaned’ out to us for the season to fully perfect the skill and know-how in producing, green, seamer friendly pitches that are guaranteed to end inside 3 days, provided no hold up by the weather
Re MCC "World Cricket Committee", what a grand title ! Their long winded, and mostly fairly obvious conclusions, amount pretty much to, the money is going to dry up.
ReplyDeleteBlaze coach Chris Guest spoke of these new reforms at NCL meeting recently
ReplyDeleteI prefer it the way it is now and I’m not particularly keen on any proposed Nottinghamshire Women team if we decide to pursue this avenue, but he said the ECB are no longer happy 😃 to fund the current regime.
Perhaps it could simplify things as as present, Marie Kelly(for example) plays for The Blaze possibly regarded as a ‘Nottinghamshire’ team but then also Northern Superchargers in the women’s Hindred
So dunno 🤷♀️ perhaps if nowt else it could clarify things assuming it actually happens?
Every goddam enquiry finds there is sexism, racism etc !
ReplyDelete80 NOT OUT
ReplyDeleteI would imagine racism and sexism started the day after Adam and Eve were born . Because of inherent human nature it will never be eradicated .
To clarify, I meant I prefer the Women’s Blaze team associated to Trent Bridge as opposed to them becoming Notts Women CCC
ReplyDeleteI saw The Blaze twice last season and really enjoyed their high skill level and athleticism now the girls are all full - time (This makes a huge difference, obviously)
May not make much of a difference, just feel this format with The Blaze is working well as it currently is
I completely agree. Women's cricket has developed massively and is great to watch, I watched the Blaze at Loughborough last season and they were great matches. While it is good to develop more opportunities, I would question whether clubs can really support a 3-division, 18 or more team format. I would hope the women's game develops 4-day and Test cricket over time.
DeleteAs a severely deaf person, think very good this is happening.
ReplyDeleteIt is very disappointing that this committee lumps together us people who think the process in establishing guilt in cricket over racism was deeply flawed, and often unjust, with those who abuse people on line or otherwise. Millions of us, and several civil courts, have ruled the process unfair, the latter in individual employment tribunals. I keep thinking of poor Martyn Moxon, found to have done nothing wrong, whose life has been badly damaged. That is just plain wrong.
ReplyDeleteHead coach of the Blaze implied they would no longer be called this going fwd from next year as one of the 8
ReplyDeleteIf anything I find this more confusing as we’ve now all got used to The Blaze but are they now wanting to separate the current names in case people are getting them mixed up with the womens Hundred I wonder ?
How unbelievably stupid to have all teams but one named after their county.
ReplyDeleteI agree. Shows a lack of commitment of "the franchise" to the host county / of the county to commit to host all home matches of "the franchise". If the Blaze are entering Women's County Comps, they should be a county representative team, like the rest of the competing teams. It makes no sense otherwise.
Delete"Ms Knight’s behaviour was discriminatory" and
ReplyDelete"the Cricket Discipline Commission (CDC) accepted there was no racist intent in her conduct."
How can anyone discriminate without intent ?
they are saying that she didnt know what she was doing and how her behaviour would impact on others of a more sensitive nature. Me say it was just lazy fancy dress
Delete