Tuesday 26 February 2019

PCA Warn of Hundred Suicide



Arrangements for 'The Hundred' 'suicide' for smaller clubs: UK union chief.
BBC News.
Tuesday, 26 February 2019.
PTG 2740-13686.

Worcestershire opener Daryl Mitchell, who is currently chairman of the UK Professional Cricketers’ Association (PCA) has warned that there must be a clear defining line between English cricket's existing counties and the new teams in The Hundred when it begins in 2020 (PTG 2714-13566, 3 February 2019).  Speaking on the day he was re-elected to begin his final two-year term as PCA chairman, former captain Mitchell admitted to concerns about the imminent arrival of city-based cricket.

Mitchell believes the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) have got it "about right" in terms of limiting the number of overseas players per 15-man squad to three, as that will mean fans can see the very best "white-ball cricketers from around the world”.  However, in his view: "The teams in The Hundred must have independent head coaches or directors of cricket (PTG 2713-13559, 2 February 2019).  There must be two sides, two budgets, two sets of selectors or this could be suicide for the smaller counties.  Initially [The Hundred] was sold as something different and new.  It’s something the PCA and ECB were aligned on. I’ve sat in meetings where it has been passed that the teams have to be independent. That is paramount to integrity of the competition".  

The worry is that the host counties will have a huge competitive advantage if their coaches are given control of The Hundred's £UK1.2 million ($A2.2m) per team playing budget.  "They can't be making decisions about The Hundred one minute and then picking their county sides 10 minutes later”, added Mitchell.  "Control of the budget is the key issue. Non-host counties would have to be very naive not to be worried, as we've already seen this situation play out in Australia.  Every player has to have a fair opportunity to take part in what we think should be a great competition.  We want the best 96 English players to be involved and we don't want it to be a postcode lottery about where you play your cricket”.

The composition and names of the eight teams in The Hundred are still to be decided ahead of a player draft set for October 2019.



plans to ignore The Oval overturned.
Elizabeth Ammon and Matt Hughes.

The Times.
Saturday, 23 February 2019.

PTG 2736-13672.

The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has gone back on its threat to exclude The Oval as a host venue for its new 100-ball tournament 'The Hundred' after objections by influential county chairmen and its own management board.  As reported this week, ECB chairman Colin Graves had proposed the removal of the Oval as one of the eight main venues for The Hundred in retaliation for Surrey’s perceived lack of support for the competition (PTG 2733-13660, 20 February 2019).

Last month, Surrey voted against the constitutional change required to introduce the new 100-ball format, which angered Graves to the point that he proposed replacing the Oval as a venue with Chelmsford or Bristol.  However, the management board of the new tournament, which includes the chairmen of Northamptonshire and Warwickshire as well as a number of independent directors from the world of business and entertainment, rejected Graves’s proposal, insisting that to maximise the audience and commercial potential for the tournament there had to be a second London venue in addition to Lord’s.

The broadcast partners for The Hundred, Sky and the BBC, were not made aware of the ECB’s proposal to remove the Oval but have subsequently objected strongly on the grounds that the tournament needs the largest venues and The Oval is one of the most likely to be consistently sold out.  Had the ECB carried out its plan it is likely that it would have been open to legal action by Surrey.

A number of county officials have also been in contact with senior officials at the ECB in the past couple of days to object to the lack of consultation and process around their decision.  They cited a report by the Good Governance Institution last year that criticised the governing body for “overuse of informal process, lack of effective stakeholder engagement processes and the absence of appropriate levels of trust” (PTG 2584-13008, 28 September 2018).  The ECB accepted the criticism at the time but a number of senior county officials believe that Graves’s decision to try to exclude the Oval was evidence that these practices still take place within the governing body.

It is expected that the ECB will draw up legal agreements with the host venues and make announcements about the team names before the domestic season starts in April.



Graves plan to drop Oval for Hundred may split ECB board.
Elizabeth Ammon.
Thursday, 21 February 2019.
PTG 2734-13666.

England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) chairman Colin Graves is expected to face opposition from his own board over his proposal to punish Surrey by ditching the Oval as one of the eight venues for new The Hundred that starts next year.  Graves wants to jettison the Oval because Surrey did not vote in favour of a constitutional change to allow the new 100-ball format to go ahead (PTG 2733-13660, 20 February 2019).

The 71-year-old’s course of action against the county, whom he insists he cannot work with, will likely split the board, which comprises eleven independent directors. An emergency meeting is expected to be held shortly during which at least four of the directors are expected to raise concerns about not wanting to be party to a decision that smacks of petulance by Graves, and the financial impact that losing the largest county would have.

One county official said: “They are cutting off their nose to spite their face and it will have an impact on the whole tournament.  It needs two London venues if we are looking at attracting new people, the Oval has an enormous catchment area”.  Although the bulk of the income will come from TV revenue and sponsorship, any decision to move the competition away from the Oval will deter potential sponsors.

An ECB announcement is due next month to reveal the branding and team names, but a split would delay this, causing more concern among the stakeholders given that the first player draft is scheduled for early October.



ECB threatens to ditch the Oval for The Hundred.
Matt Hughes and Elizabeth Ammon.

The Times.
Wednesday, 20 February 2019.
PTG 2733-13660.
The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) is threatening to abandon the Oval as a host venue for The Hundred in an act of retribution after Surrey voted against the format chosen for English cricket’s new competition that starts next year (PTG 2450-12397, 13 May 2018).  Colin Graves, the ECB chairman, has told several counties that the Oval could be dropped when the eight teams are announced next month. Bristol and Chelmsford are potential alternative venues.

The eight venues for what was initially a city-based Twenty20 tournament were named a year ago — the Oval, Lord’s, Headingley, Old Trafford, Edgbaston, Ageas Bowl, Trent Bridge and Sophia Gardens — before the ECB revealed its 100-ball format two months later. None of the contracts with the venues have been signed.

Graves is understood to be seeking approval from the ECB board to remove the Oval. It would be a dramatic change of direction a year before the launch of the controversial tournament, as well as a major gamble to sideline the biggest club in the country.  Surrey had voted in favour of the ECB creating a new competition but are understood to have voted against changing the format to 100 balls last month.

The ECB wrote to all 18 counties asking them to approve the change and obtained the two-thirds majority required. Surrey’s vote against is understood to have infuriated Graves. Surrey have yet to be told of the ECB’s plans. The County club has been a vocal critic of The Hundred, arguing that neither the club nor their members believe a fourth format is needed, particularly when they have a track record of selling out the Oval for T20 matches.

Almost a sixth of tickets for domestic T20 matches last northern summer were sold at the Oval, which has the second-highest capacity in the country at 25,000 and plans to expand to 40,000 by 2023. The capacity at Lord’s is 30,000 but it stages fewer T20 matches.  Any decision to drop the Oval would affect Kent, who were set to jointly manage the Oval-based franchise with Surrey. All 18 counties plus the Marylebone Cricket Club will have direct roles on the management boards of the eight new teams.  The ECB’s plans are also likely to alarm potential sponsors. The governing body declined to comment on Tuesday.

16 comments:

  1. The BEST thing now is that at the AGM Notts Members press for Trent Bridge to refuse to host any such Matches - time for the Counties to get together and support Surrey and oppose this pathetic, ill-thought-out venture by the ECB.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leader of the Pack20 February 2019 at 13:22

      If only AndrewM1, the problem is the counties have been promised a nice little million pound plus sweetener as an incentive to get the two thirds majority required.

      Delete
    2. Never underestimate the power of a nice bribe or a spot of blackmail.

      Delete
  2. Interestingly the fact that no Contracts have yet been signed will start to raise concerns with Sponsors who, let's face it, are only in it for the money. Unless SKY and the BBC can be convinced that the 100-ball knockabout will be well supported they will soon lose interest. My guess is that this whole venture will prove to be ill thought out and will fail dismally - or, in my hope, will fail gloriously!!! Would you turn out for 10 overs of 10 balls per side and probably be expected to pay £20 for the privilege? - a £1 per Over!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pricing will be rock bottom bargain basement levels, to get people in - marketing will be in your face everywhere too... they are budgetting for this. If only they could do this to the existing formats in stead.

      Delete
  3. Yes the famous hand out is still in the potential stage and sponsors are likely to be very concerned at The Oval being effectively thrown out, if that happens. Although the Board has been selected by Mr Graves, it is interesting that they are getting worried about this unpredictability and it seems putting emotion ahead of business decisions. He says he cannot work with Surrey, well Surrey are a massive part of Cricket, so if that is the cade, he should resign

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Never underestimate the power of a good punishment beating either...

      Delete
  4. Love the animated Logo - says it all!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. If anybody can give the ECB a bloody nose it’s Surrey. They are probably the only County to whom 1.3m is a paltry amount of money and certainly not a big enough sum to sell out our game for, even if they were inclined to do so. Could Surrey be the White Knight we have been waiting for in this whole sorry episode.

    ReplyDelete
  6. But money talks - hence why the Oval was reinstated - the ECB aren't entirely stupid!!! The 100 will still fail regardless - will our neighbours (Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Northants) flock to Trent Bridge to support a Nottingham-based Side? - I think not.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As I remember it, the ECB objective originally, was to get more people playing cricket because the number of participants in the game had dropped drastically. The All Stars programme in conjunction with a new-nothing-old-county-orientated-T20-competition designed to excite the youth of the UK and to rival the IPL and the BBL, plus with coverage on free terrestrial TV was supposed to be the answer and to rescue cricket from obscurity and imminent extinction in England.

    What we've got in 2020 with this Hundred is alienating existing cricket supporters, the ones that will be the initial audience figures on terrestrial or pay to view TV. The un-named teams are likely to have no natural fan base and draw upon a random collective of spectators brought to the grounds by cheap overly hyped tickets. Spectators that will be confused to the extreme if they had any prior knowledge of the rules or format of a game of cricket and if they hadn't they would have no appreciation of the high or otherwise standard of play that they are bearing witness to and so not be inspired to take up the sport because they won't know if what they've seen is worth trying to emulate. Money will have been wasted on paying the top appearance fees for domestic and overseas players to take part. Meanwhile, the existing game in its three formats is pushed to the margins further, crowds will suffer, advertising revenue will be reduced and county incomes will drop. Counties will wither once the £1.3M sweeteners stop.

    If no one watches The Hundred games on TV, the schedulers will quickly sideline it, sticking it on increasingly remote channels, how soon for a Sky sports 4 or 5 channel or a red button on BBC 4. Has no one cottoned on yet, the youth don't watch traditional TV no more anyway - if it's not coming through their phone, that is constantly in their palms, as an alert or update, it doesn't exist!

    The Hundred on the face of it is less likely to be cricket's saviour than it is to be it's eventual executioner.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Hundred launch next summer! Well for a start the playing conditions are very complicated even for existing cricket fans let alone for ‘the new audience’! No England test match players, no Indian players, the BCCI don’t like the Hundred they rightly feel they need to protect the established T20 IPL brand. No top West Indies players, no top New Zealand players and no top South African players. The 2020 summer sees these three sides involved in International cricket in the Caribbean. Additionally with the T20 World Cup coming up in October and November 2020 in Australia the top International players will in any case want to prioritise staying with their national sides rather than take on a new format with a low wage cap.

    In the meantime the Hundred will feature dropped International players, and/or players on maybe short stays of which many will be in the autumn of their careers, along with the average county player that incidentally don’t really fancy it but ‘money talks’! It will have ruined the 50 over competition at the expense of not only the England ODI side but also the county game, squanded millions of unrecoupable pounds and Mr Harrison and Mr Graves this is just some the consequences of this madness!

    As you say Mr Harrison, very exciting already!! It’s going very well pal ain’t it!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Time to cut your losses Mr Harrison; fold before it's too late.

      Delete
  9. 'Pride cometh before a fall'

    ReplyDelete
  10. Reckon this will revert to the established T20 format within two years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the Notts Chairman says the money is guaranteed for 5 years! So it doesn't matter if no-one turns up to watch or no-one watches on TV - the money is guaranteed - no doubt mainly from SKY. The Counties will all get £1.3million for the 5 year period.

      Delete

Please share your thoughts...