Tuesday 4 August 2020

Derbyshire BWT North at Trent Bridge - Loss REPORT



Day 4

DERBYSHIRE DESERVED VICTORS AS NOTTS SINK TO A NEW LOW

In a superb game of 4-day cricket Derbyshire gained a thoroughly deserved three wicket victory at Trent Bridge with a ball to spare at Trent Bridge today. It was their highest fourth innings run chase against a county team in their history. Standing on 240 for 6 at tea, some commentators wrote off their chances but on a very easy paced pitch they still only needed a manageable four an over. Notts were a bowler down as Joey Evison who had had a fine game had to go off the field with a foot injury, The captain lost the plot in the last hour with some very strange field placings that gifted Derbyshire runs. After tea he had decided he could not trust winter signing Barber and after initial  burst with the second new ball, Trego was also put out to grass; as the captain stuck to three bowlers Ball, Patel and himself. Jake Ball had a fine game and bowled extremely well today finishing with figures off 33.5-9-98-3 and did not deserve to be on losing side, it was a great to see him perform so well. Positives to take way from the game along with Ball were the performances of Hameed, Evison and Patel. Trego and Barber had disappointing debuts and not for the first time Duckett and Clarke failed to fire. The comments of the Head Coach at the end of the game seemed to contradict what we had seen on the excellent live stream.

 The difference between the two teams could be summed up quite clearly in one word APPLICATION. Derby despite only scoring 111 in the first two sessions knew that with the wicket offering little terror they could still successful chase the target, and never panicked. Only Matt Critchley today was culpable for his own dismissal, you then compare this to their Notts counterparts where too many upper order batsmen gave it away in all too familiar fashion.  

Sussex reject Fynn Hudson-Prentice led the way for the victors with a very composed 91 off 169 balls with 12 fours and was well supported with skipper Billy Godleman with 86 and a very patient 43 from Wayne Madsen. Due to light drizzle play got under way four minutes late under slate grey skies with the floodlights on. Evison (Pavilion End) and  Ball (Pavilion End) opened the bowling and neither batsman looked in too much trouble, Godleman hit Evison for four to bring the 100 partnership as rain stopped play with Derbyshire 136 for one off 39.4 overs at 1122. Play recommenced 11 minutes later. Godleman and Madsen played circumspectly in the gloomy conditions but in the 48th Godleman departed plumb leg before to a well pitched up ball from Evison, 146 for 2. Godleman 86 off 137 balls (10x4,1x6). Evison broke down four balls later with a foot injury and Patel had to complete the over. Mullaney introduced himself to the attack and Madsen got his first runs of the morning with an offside boundary. Barber came on for the next over and conceded five. In the 53rd over, du Plooy shuffled across his stump was out leg before to a swinging ball from Mullaney for 7, 165 for three. Barber failed to impress with four overs for 16 and was replaced on the stroke of lunch by Patel. Derbyshire 174 for three off 59 overs at lunch with Madsen on 42 and Critchley on 6.

 Trego (Pavilion End) and Ball opened after lunch and in fourth over of the resumption Madsen was leg before to Ball for a very patient 43, 180 for four. Ball was bowling well and he detonated Hosein's (3) off stump in the 67th over, 192 for five. Barber returned from the Pavilion End and Mullaney replaced Ball in the 73rd over as the sunshine appeared for the first time. Barber just could not get his line right to be threatening, Patel came on and with his second ball Hudson-Prentice hit him straight for four. Critchley and Hudson-Prentice went for steady accumulation against Mullaney and Patel, but on the stroke of tea Critchley (35) had a rush of blood and charged Patel and was stumped by a country mile by Moores, 234 for six. They added 42 runs in 21 overs. Derbyshire 240 for 6 off 88 overs on Hudson-Prentice on 32 and McKiernan on 2. The game was interestingly poised.

The new ball was taken two overs after tea with Derby 242 for 6 after 90 overs. After bowling four overs with the new ball and conceding 16 runs, Ball was replaced by Mullaney. Trego was replaced by Patel as Derby stood on 279 for 6 off 101 overs. Hudson-Prentice got to his 50 off 120 balls with a single off Patel which also brought up the 50 partnership for the 7th wicket with McKiernan. Hudson-Prentice hit back to back boundaries off Mullaney and stood at 296 for six off 106 overs as the game entered the last hour. Having seen off the second new ball, Derbyshire were now clear favourites.

 Costly drop

Mullaney had no choice to bring back Ball. Hudson-Prentice was dropped by Mullaney diving to left at second slip, a difficult chance off Ball when on 61. Off the last ball of the over McKiernan (20) played on to Ball, 299 for 7. Cohen, confident from the off, hit Ball to the boundary, Derbyshire needed 58 off 10 overs, which was whittled down to 34 off six. Patel then conceded seven. A short delivery from Ball was pulled for four by Hudson-Prentice. A lofted four by Hudson-Prentice off Patel achieved the 50 partnership and Derby were almost home. Derby needed five off the last over and got home with a ball to spare as the impressive left hander Cohen (30 not out) hit the winning runs. A very deserved victory for a team very well coached by David Houghton. The lionhearted Ball sanked to his knees after putting everything in, a great game of cricket but Derbyshire with a patched up bowling unit very much the deserved victors. Notts had lost their sixteenth game in a winless run now standing at 22 games over a 26 months period. I will leave up to the readers of this report as to whether you think that qualifies us under the category of “ a p*** poor county”

 They don't know what they're doing(?)

With Leicester winning against Lancashire, Notts even at this early stage, seemed destined for bottom place with a bowling attack already looking exceeding threadbare, whatever happened to last year’s find Liam Patterson-White? The Leicester victory was set up by player sent on loan from Notts who was dropped in favour of 37 year old veteran in his last year of his contract.  This coupled with the idiotic decision to send Patel in at eight does not really show the club’s management in a very good light. I wonder whether we might have scored more runs if Patel had come higher up.

 The club lost many seasoned members during the winter after the committee failed to heed to their supporters wishes for change. So this defeat coupled with muddled thinking at the top, begs the question with the 10 August deadline looming as to how many members will ask for a refund? This defeat could prove more costly than just a hit to the team morale….. MAG





So were promises kept?
  • to improve on last season's abysmal form NO
  • to make members proud DEFINITELY NOT
  • streaming will be better than the static cameras of previous summers and watchable IMPROVEMENT YES BUT NOT TV QUALITY, perhaps engage a new commentator, as DB is a bit like Marmite

Date (last day)

Opposition

Venue

Toss

Result

Bat’

Bowl’

Total points

29 June 2018

WORC’SHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

23 July 2018

SURREY

TB

U

LI183R

1

2

3

22 Aug 2018

Hampshire

Rose Bowl

U

L270R

-

3

3

31 Aug 2018

Surrey

The Oval

U

LI125R

-

3

3

07 Sep 2018

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

5

2

12

13 Sep 2018

ESSEX

TB

W

L8W

-

3

3

26 Sep 2018

SOMERSET

TB

L

LI146R

-

2

2

08 Apr 2019

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

13 Apr 2019

SOMERSET

TB

U

LI14R

2

3

4*

16 May 2019

Essex

Chelmsford

W

L8W

-

3

3

23 May 2019

Hampshire

Newclose

U

L244R

1

3

4

06 June 2019

Warwickshire

Edgbaston

L

D

-

1

6

12 June 2019

HAMPSHIRE

WELBECK

U

D

-

-

5

20 June 2019

Kent

Tunbridge Wells

U

L285R

2

3

5

03 July 2019

ESSEX

TB

W

LI123R

1

1

2

09 July 2019

Somerset

Taunton

L

L132R

1

3

4

15 July 2019

SURREY

TB

L

L167R

-

3

3

21 Aug 2019

Yorkshire

Scarborough

U

L143R

-

3

3

12 Sep 2019

KENT

TB

L

L227R

-

3

3

19 Sep 2019

WARWICKSHIRE

TB

L

L8W

5

1

6

26 Sep 2019

Surrey

The Oval

L

D

-

2

7

04 Aug 2020

Derbyshire

TB (away**)

L

L3W

3

3

6


 History Awaits?

History would favour Notts, Derbyshire don't chase down 365 as a rule but the circumstances of this game do point to a successful result for the Peakites today (if you have your negative, Notts can't win ever, our bowlers need to go back to school, hat on). 

Untrouble through the session last night, Godleman and Madsen only need to bat another session without mishap and the rest ought to be able to complete the job.
The last three Derbyshire wickets have currently put on 206/2...

But, there is a long way to go and with that an opportunity for a Notts bowler or two to stand-up and to be noticed. History favours the brave as someone once said (?)


Derbyshire's highest fourth inning scores:


Trego along with Barber have points to prove, to justify their selection or even why they are on the Notts books in the first place!! Neither have shown much in this game to endear them to watching-remotely Notts supporters who, if we were allowed to be there, would have been shouting "words of wisedom" at them for much of this game.

Day 3




GODLEMAN AND MADSEN SET PERFECT PLATFORM

WITH THE GAME NOW DERBYSHIRE'S TO LOSE?

Experienced pair Billy Godleman (69 not out) and Wayne Madsen (27 not out) have manoeuvred Derbyshire into a winning position adding an unbroken 96 for the second wicket this opening Bob Willis Trophy fixture at Trent Bridge as the Peakites are now favourites to win. Requiring 365 for victory, Derbyshire lost Luis Reece to a poor shot, but on an easy paced featherbed pitch against an unthreatening and two cases a novice Notts attack, the two batsmen made untroubled progress to 129 for one at the close, needing a further 236 for victory. Notts had earlier added 195 to their overnight score. It could have been much worse at Notts stumbled to 150 for seven as Trego and Moores joined Duckett and Clarke in failing twice against a very wholehearted Derbyshire attack that on paper looked little better than a Notts Premier League attack. Enter Samit once more who looked head and shoulders above his batting colleagues hitting a superb 80 and he was well supported by Joey Evison (31) and Jake Ball (22) as they helped add 74 and 55 respectively for the eighth and ninth wickets; helped in must be said by skipper Godleman spreading out his field in exactly the same manner as Mullaney did yesterday. Earlier Hameed had followed up his first innings 63 to score 52 in a perfect exhibition of a batsman being able to bat time, something that Notts had needed badly in recent seasons.

Play got underway with Reece (Pavilion End) and Conners (Radcliffe Road End). The 50 partnership between Hameed and Mullaney came in the second over of the morning. In the 35th over, Mullaney pulled Conners for six into The Fridge and hit him for a four through extra cover. In the next over a ball from Reece popped up and found the edge of Mullaney's bat and he was caught by McKiernan in the gully, probably the only ball that misbehaved all day. Mullaney had made 48 off 65 balls (8x4,1x6), 116 for 4, the fourth wicket had added 75 runs. Aitchison came on in the next over and bowled a maiden. Trego hit him for two fours in his following over but departed in his next over caught at second slip by Matt Critchley for eight, 127 for five. Hameed got to his 50 off 125 balls with a single off Aitchison. Moores, who never looked in, threw his wicket way mistiming a pull shot  off Cohen being well caught by Reece at mid on for seven,  140 for six. Hameed long innings came to end when he was caught in the gully by McKiernan off Aitchison for 52 (143 balls,7x4), 150 for seven. Patel batting ludicrously low at eight hit three successive fours off Cohen, 15 off the over. Notts went to lunch on 172 for 7 off  56 overs with Patel on 27 and Evison on 2.

 A shower over lunch delayed the second session by four minutes. Patel and Evison brought up their 50 run partnership off 58 balls. Leg spinner Critchley came into the attack in the 64th over and his first ball a full toss was deposited for a boundary through the covers by Patel. Evison went for 31 caught at second slip by Critchley off Aitchison,  224 for eight. The 8th wicket partnership  had added 74 runs. Evison is extremely promising cricketer. Patel reached his 50 off 40 balls with a single  off leg spinner Mattie McKiernan. Ball hit McKiernan for two successive fours. Patel then took two consecutive fours off Aitchison to take Notts past 250. An exquisite late cut from Ball off Critchley saw Notts to a 350 lead. Patel then launched Critchley for a huge straight six. Next over a straight driven four by Ball off Reece brought up the 50 partnership for the ninth wicket. Patel finally departed leg before to Critchley for 80 off 94 balls (10x4, 1x6), 279 for nine.  The ninth wicket stand was worth 55 runs. Ball fell next over caught behind off Cohen for 22, Notts 279 all out. Tea was taken between the innings. Aitchison 3 for 55 and Conners 3 for 63 the leading bowlers.

Derbyshire required 365 to win and Ball (Radcliffe Road End) and Trego (Pavilion End) took the new ball but carried no threat. Reece smashed a short ball from Ball for six in the seventh over, the over costing 13. Reece (24 from 21 balls) though gave it away he crisply drove Trego to Ball at mid on who took the catch low down, 33 for one. Trego's maiden first-class wicket for Notts. After bowling six overs for 30 Jake Ball was replaced by Joey Evison. Barber came on the 16th over as Derby reached 50. The former Middlesex man radar was decidedly wayward, including bowling including one off side wide that went to the boundary, Notts were desperate for a wicket as Ball returned for the 23rd over replacing Evison (5 overs for 22). Patel came on next over to the replace Barber (4 overs for 23), Godleman hit his first ball for six over mid wicket and slogged sweeped his next ball for four, he finished the over with a boundary, 16 off the over, Derbyshire reaching 100 and Godleman for 50. Cue a pow wow from the captain as all the tea, joined a socially distanced huddle. With five overs remaining Trego came on from the Radcliffe Road End, but never threatened in a two over burst.  The last over was bowled by Steven Mullaney but no wicket was forthcoming as Derbyshire closed on 129 for one off 35 overs.

Notts must take early wickets tomorrow morning as they desperately try to halt their humiliating 26 month run without a first-class victory. Jake Ball and that man Patel are probably be the key men in a Notts attack that includes two men in Barber and Evison that have five first-class wickets between them, all take in this game.

 Congratulations to Ben Slater who scored 172 against Lancashire today at New Road whilst on loan to Leicestershire. The Red Rose County decimated with international call ups and injuries  having three first-class bowling debutants in their line up and the left hander took full advantage. Will he return to Notts line up on Saturday? MAG




Day 2

DU PLOOY TON KEEPS GAME IN THE BALANCE

On a topsy turvey day at Trent Bridge Notts lead Derbyshire by 169 runs with seven second innings wickets intact. A fiery and impressive spell by Jake Ball removed the Derbyshire top three (Reece, Godleman and Madsen) in the first 35 minutes for 26 runs, but then a partnership of 93 between man of the day Leus du Plooy (130) and Matt Critchley (45) steadied the ship. Off the first ball of the afternoon session a crazy mix up between the two Derby batsmen saw Critchley run out. Joey Evison then filleted  the middle order and when the erratic Tom Barber removed numbers 9 and 10. Derby stood at 159 for nine with Du Plooy still at the crease. Unfortunately the field was spread and with the Notts bowlers seemingly forgetting to bowl a straight well-pitched deliveries du Plooy took full advantage as he added 80 for the last wicket with Sam Conners. When Notts went in, Nash and Duckett were out to awful shots and with Clarke leg before once more, Notts slipped to 41 for three, all three wickets to Conners, who started life at Attenborough CC, but then Mullaney and the impressive Hammed battened down the hatches to leave the match delicately poised. The pitch is lacking pace and is playing well and Notts will be looking for a lead of 350 plus.

 Ball and Trego opened up this morning and with the second ball of the third over of the day Reece tickled Ball to Moores behind the wicket to depart for a 16 ball duck, 14 for 1. In his next over, the impressive Ball had Godleman (18) caught behind by Moores, 19 for two. In the 13th over, Ball had Wayne Madsen caught in the gully by Chris Nash for a 13 ball duck, 26 for three. Matt Critchley hit Jake Ball for three successive fours in the 17th over as Derby fought back. Next over Evison replaced Trego from the Pavilion End and then Mullaney replaced Ball who had an opening spell of 7-2-21-3. Off the last three balls of the 22nd overs du Plooy hit Evison for three successive fours. After a three over burst he was replaced by debutant Tom Barber. The fifty partnership between du Plooy and Critchley came up via boundary for the latter off Barber. After a six-over spell which cost eight runs, the captain withdrew himself and back came Ball. Derbyshire got to 100 in the 32nd over off the brisk but erratic Barber who next over conceded five wides; his six over spell costing 38 runs. Derbyshire got to lunch 119 for three off 34 overs with du Plooy on 46 and Critchley on 45.

 The first ball after lunch saw a terrible mix up between Critchley and non striker du Plooy with Ball the bowler. Critchley hit the ball on the leg side and set off for a non-existent run but a dreadful throw from Patel went over Moores head. Critchley who had just about given up was run out by Mullaney who picked up the wayward throw and knocked down the stumps from around eight yards with Critchley still short of his ground. Hosein was then out next over plumb leg before for Evison for a 4 ball one, 120 for five. Du Plooy got to a 93 ball half century with a single off Evison. Evison picked up his second first-class wicket as Hudson-Prentice departed leg before for 8, 132 for 6. The former Sussex man batted with Wayne Madsen as his runner due to a thigh problem. McKiernan lasted just six balls, flashing hard to Evison he was well caught by Hameed above his head in the gully for a duck, 134 for seven. Trego replaced Ball from the Radcliffe Road End and Barber came on for Evison after the 18 year-old had a spell of 6-1-13-3. Barber picked up his maiden first-class wicket removing Michael Cohen's off stump, the left hander out for seven, 149 for eight. Barber found the edge of debutant Ben Aitchison (8) bat and Mullaney took a regulation catch low at second slip, 159 for nine. 

 Then the game took another twist, Mullaney started setting silly fields and Notts over did the short stuff to du Plooy who hit three fours off four balls off Barber. Patel belated came on  from the Radcliffe Road  End and for the next over Ball from the Pavilion End but du Plooy hit him for four and huge six over long on to reach his 100 off 144 balls. After two innocuous overs from Patel to Conners, Barber returned but proved expensive. The runs kept coming Ball being hit for successive sixes by du Plooy. Mullaney and Patel then bowled in tandem. Tea was delayed and then finally the tenth wicket was taken at 1649 when du Plooy mistimed Patel and Evison took a fine catch running towards the boundary from mid off. Du  Plooy out for a brilliant 130 off 177 balls (11x4, 3x6); he has proved a fine signing for Derbyshire. Conners proving he is no Harry Gurney with 5 not out off 55 balls. The tenth wicket had added a record partnership for the fixture of 80 beating by six the 74 added by Harold Rhodes and Alan Ward exactly 51 years ago at Ilkeston. Derbyshire 239 all out off 71 overs, Evison 3 for 38, Ball 3 for 71 and Barber 15-1-71-2. Notts lead restricted to 85 runs. Trego who opened the bowling was wicketless in his 13 overs.

 Chris Nash was dismissed in dreadful fashion to the second ball of the innings being comprehensively bowled missing an extravagant pull shot to a ball that did not get up by Conners (Radcliffe Road End), 0 for one.  Aitchison bowled two overs from the Pavilion End and then switched ends and replaced Conners for the seventh over. Duckett (23) also fell to a poor shot being strangled down the leg side by Conners, 39 for two in the 13th over. Clarke (2) only lasted ten balls before falling plumb leg before pulling across the line as Conners picked up his third wicket, 41 for three. Mullaney(27 not out)  joined Hameed (30 not out) and they added an unbeaten 43 as Notts closed on 84 for three off 29 overs at the ridiculously late time of 1927. The morning session will be crucial tomorrow as a rookie attack bowls against a batting line up which is always potentially one wicket away from spontaneous combustion. MAG


Day 1
ROLLERCOASTER FIRST NOTTS INNINGS OF THE BOB WILLIS TROPHY

County Cricket returned for the first time in ten months as Derbyshire, the home team, by the Bob Willis Trophy fixture list, visited Trent Bridge as the County Ground has been given over to the England's women team. The world has been turned upside down in the last six months, but one thing Coronavirus cannot stop is a Notts batting collapse which duly arrived with the score on 111 for nought, it became 160 for seven as Derbyshire inexperienced attack started to get the ball to swing as the morning sunshine changed to a cloudy afternoon.  


After a heavy shower extended tea to seventy minutes Notts fought back well in the last session as Samit Patel, batting ridiculously low at eight hit an entertaining 63 and was well supported by Joey Evison (38) and Jake Ball (34). The highlight of the day was a debut 68 for Haseeb Hameed who batted throughout the morning session with Chris Nash (59).


Before play commenced Hameed received his Notts cap as Derbyshire won the toss and elected to bowl. The visitors were without key pair Tony Palladino and Ravi Rampaul, the former is taking a break from cricket at the moment and the latter is due to arrive from Trinidad soon. 


Haseeb Hameed, Pete Trego and Tom Barber were making their Notts first-class debuts with Zak Chappell omitted from the twelve. Last year’s leading wicket taker Luke Fletcher was missing with a side strain. Derbyshire opened the bowling with the inexperienced pairing of Sam Conners from Stapleford (Radcliffe Road End) and debutant Ben Aitchison formerly of Lancashire Academy and Cheshire (Pavilion End) but they generally wasted the new ball with an erratic display probably hindered with nerves. Luis Reece replaced Aitchison in the eighth over and then Fynn Hudson-Prentice came on in the 11th over. A straight driven four by Nash off Reece brought up the 50 partnership in the 12th over, the next ball was hit through extra cover by Nash. Aitchison returned from the Pavilion End and his first ball was very much a loosener and was pulled for six by Nash over square leg. Hameed hit three fours off the 21st over bowled by Hudson-Prentice. Conners replaced Fynn Hudson-Prentice for the 23rd over and a short ball was pulled for three by Nash who brought his fifty off 69 balls. There was a stoppage, as a ball from Aitchison reared up and hit keeper Harvey Hosein on his right finger. The Notts hundred came up in the 27th over via a four by Hameed. Notts got to lunch on 109 for 0 off 28 overs with Nash on 57 and Hameed on 45, having made relatively untroubled progress. 


The game turned in the middle session. Conners opened up after lunch and with his fifth ball a well pitched up ball saw Nash plumb leg before for 59 off 86 balls (7x4,1x6), the first wicket had amassed 111 runs. This was the first hundred partnership in county tirst-class cricket for Notts since Kraigg Brathwaite and Ben Slater added 108 versus Essex at Trent Bridge in 2018. In the previous game the same pair had added 182 for the opening wicket against Yorkshire, also at Trent Bridge. Duckett (9) lasted only 17 balls before edging Aitchison low down to Leus du Plooy at second slip who took the catch, 124 for two.  In the same over Hameed got to his half ton in 112 balls with a four all the along the deck through the extra cover region. Left arm seamer Michael Cohen came on for the 30th over. Cohen was making his debut for Derbyshire having previously played first class cricket for Cape Cobras and Western Province in his native South Africa. Cohen had played two trial games for Notts Seconds at York and Harrogate last season having combined figures of one for 119. With his ninth ball he had Clarke (8) caught behind by Hosein, 147 for three, the right hander flashing hard outside his off stump. Luis Reece picked up the fourth wicket with he had Hameed leg before for 68 (143 balls, 12 x 4), 159 for four. Trego got a single off his first ball and then Mullaney was caught in the gulley by Mattie McKiernan as Reece captured his second wicket in three balls, 160 for five.  Cohen picked up his second wicket when Trego was caught behind for one, 160 for six. Notts had lost four wickets in 3.5 overs. Hudson-Prentice replaced Cohen from the Radcliffe Road End and the second over his spell had Moores put down on five by keeper Hosein diving in front of first slip Wayne Madsen. Moores’ scratchy innings ended 15 as he edged Hudson-Prentice as Hosein took a regulation catch, 192 for seven. A leg side single for Patel brought Notts their first batting point in the 57th over. An umpiring error from Messrs Mallender and Pollard saw tea taken two overs too early at 1600, Notts 209 for 7 off 58 overs with Patel on 23 and Evison on 5. It had been very much Derbyshire’s session, Notts losing seven wickets for 100.


There was a heavy shower during the tea break and six overs were lost out of 90 over allocation when play resumed at 1711 in bright sunshine. Samit Patel came out and attacked the Derbyshire bowling and reached an entertaining 50 off 59 balls with eight fours with a four off Cohen. Another boundary followed as the 50 partnership with Joey Evison. Another two boundaries followed as Notts reached 250. Patel became Cohen's third victim caught at first slip by Madsen. Patel 63 off 70 balls with 11 fours, 253 for eight. The eighth wicket had added 61 runs in 10 overs.


Ball greeted Critchley for four and then two successive sixes over long off and extra cover. Ball continued to score freely and a six over extra cover off Critchley by Evison saw Notts to 300 and simultaneously brought up the 50 partnership. Next over Evison smashed a huge six over long off, Reece the bowler.


Mattie McKiernan came on bowling leg spin and picked up a wicket with his fifth ball as Evison was caught at mid wicket by skipper Billy Godleman for 38 off 59 balls (3x4,2x6), 321 for nine. McKiernan finished with 2 for 3 as in his next over he bowled Ball making room for 34 off 55 balls, Notts 324 off 77.2 overs. Cohen the pick of the bowlers of 3 for 47. Derbyshire despite putting Notts in would be happy given the novice nature of their attack to restrict Notts to a below par total on a wicket that the Green and Golds should have made 400 plus. The batting order needs rejigging with Patel at six, Trego at seven, Evison at eight and Moores at nine seemingly a much more sensible option.

Derby had four overs to bat as Ball (Radcliffe Road End) and Trego (Pavilion End)  took the  new ball but openers Godleman (9 not out) and Reece who has yet to score easily negotiated the 24 balls they faced. Derbyshire have a strong top four as it is vital that Notts take early wickets tomorrow morning.

Apart from missing Hameed’s dismissal which could be seen later, the live stream worked well, so congratulations to all concerned for setting this up. MAG




Steven Mullaney
Chris Nash
Haseeb Hameed
Joe Clarke
Ben Duckett
Samit Patel
Peter Trego
Tom Moores
Joey Evison
Zak Chappell
Tom Barber
Jake Ball


Preview

Promises, promises .... 

promises have been made: 
  • to improve on last season's abysmal form
  • to make members proud
  • streaming will be better than the static cameras of previous summers and watchable
An improvement shouldn't be too challenging, as they were collectively so very, very poor. last season.

Making members proud, might be dependant on how individuals' attitudes project on to the screen: TV, computer monitor, tablet or phone, as we're unable to see in person. Actions do speak louder than words and we were fed a diet of empty assurances and excuses last year to see us through a whole extra year of bland, meaningless text book soundbites.

Showtime tomorrow - an "away game", at Trent Bridge as Derbyshire are in a self-imposed exile.

Ben Slater won't be in the squad, once it's announced as he commenses a two week loan spell with Leicestershire tomorrow. 



Just a reminder that Nottinghamshire remain shamefully winless in First Class Cricket since 23rd June 2018

Date (last day)
Opposition
Venue
Toss
Result
Bat’
Bowl’
Total points
29 June 2018
WORC’SHIRE
TB
U
D
4
3
12
23 July 2018
SURREY
TB
U
LI183R
1
2
3
22 Aug 2018
Hampshire
Rose Bowl
U
L270R
-
3
3
31 Aug 2018
Surrey
The Oval
U
LI125R
-
3
3
07 Sep 2018
YORKSHIRE
TB
U
D
5
2
12
13 Sep 2018
ESSEX
TB
W
L8W
-
3
3
26 Sep 2018
SOMERSET
TB
L
LI146R
-
2
2
08 Apr 2019
YORKSHIRE
TB
U
D
4
3
12
13 Apr 2019
SOMERSET
TB
U
LI14R
2
3
4*
16 May 2019
Essex
Chelmsford
W
L8W
-
3
3
23 May 2019
Hampshire
Newclose
U
L244R
1
3
4
06 June 2019
Warwickshire
Edgbaston
L
D
-
1
6
12 June 2019
HAMPSHIRE
WELBECK
U
D
-
-
5
20 June 2019
Kent
Tunbridge Wells
U
L285R
2
3
5
03 July 2019
ESSEX
TB
W
LI123R
1
1
2
09 July 2019
Somerset
Taunton
L
L132R
1
3
4
15 July 2019
SURREY
TB
L
L167R
-
3
3
21 Aug 2019
Yorkshire
Scarborough
U
L143R
-
3
3
12 Sep 2019
KENT
TB
L
L227R
-
3
3
19 Sep 2019
WARWICKSHIRE
TB
L
L8W
5
1
6
26 Sep 2019
Surrey
The Oval
L
D
-
2
7

* Deducted 1 point for slow over rate

Derbyshire squad

1. Billy Godleman
10. Luis Reece
77. Wayne Madsen
76. Leus du Plooy
16. Harvey Hosein
18. Alex Hughes
20. Matt Critchley
21. Mattie McKiernan
33. Fynn Hudson-Prentice
59. Sam Conners
8. Michael Cohen
11. Ben Aitchison

Nottinghamshire host Derbyshire tomorrow as First-Class cricket makes its return - and you can watch all the action online for free with our multi-camera live stream at trentbridge.co.uk.


Our live coverage will allow you to welcome a taste of Trent Bridge into your home, with multi-camera footage, action replays, in-play statistics and post-match reaction at the conclusion of each matchday.


Whilst nothing can quite replicate a day at our hallowed home, we hope that you find our revamped coverage to be the next best thing.



IT'S FIRST CLASS- BUT NOT AS WE KNOW IT!


Notts have supplied a handy reminder of conditions for the Bob Willis Trophy


The competition will have First-Class status, however some alterations to the usual County Championship playing conditions have been made to accomodate circumstances relating to COVID-19:

Playing conditions

  • A day's play will consist of a minumum of 90 overs - down from 96.
  • Each county’s first innings of a match can last no longer than 120 overs
  • The follow-on will increase from 150 to 200 runs
  • The new ball will be available after 90 overs rather than 80 overs

Loans

The loan system has been relaxed this summer so that counties can loan a player from another county for a minimum of one week.

Points system

During the Bob Willis Trophy, points awarded for a draw will be increase from five (as in the County Championship) to eight points. All other points scoring will remain the same as in the County Championship. The change in points awarded for a draw is to help mitigate against the impact of weather during a shortened competition.

Tie-breaker in final

In the event of a drawn final, the county that leads on first innings (as long as there were two fully-completed first innings) would be deemed the winner of the final. In any other circumstances a drawn or tied final will result in the trophy being shared by the finalists.

County Championship

The Bob Willis Trophy is a separate competition to the County Championship. Results in the Bob Willis Trophy will have no bearing on the divisions for next summer’s County Championship.


118 comments:

  1. Oldest on debut for Notts, since 2000
    Gary Keedy 39yrs 277 days on debut
    Ali Brown 39yrs 69 days
    Peter Trego 39yrs 50 days tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Samit listed at number 8 on the downloadable scorecard on the Trent Bridge website with Zak Chappell missing out. A sad reflection on his performances over the last couple of seasons.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would be surprised if that eleven is correct, but if it is, we are going in very batting heavy - maybe just wanting not to lose the first match. Evison at 9 - as far as I am aware he is mainly a batsman but does bowl some brisk medium pace.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unless he is injured, why has Patterson White not been selected .

    I seem to remember , that along with Ashwin, he was our most consistent performer during the latter stages of 2019.

    More downtime for the Chappel of Rest.I wonder if Leicester would want him back as a loan ?

    ReplyDelete
  5. After almost a year had forgotten just how bland and tedious a commentator Dave"I'll blow smoke up the players backside" Bracegirdle was. I'm going to record his commentary on a separate device and then when I can't sleep at night I'll unleash him. No need to count sheep anymore. Had always thought, very similar to last time we were back in Div. 2 the batting would fire. You could argue some are above this standard but not yet consistent to perform in Div. 1 and we have Debyshire, Leicestershire and Durham in our weak group ?To me, the real problem is the bowling. It's hammer house of horror stuff with no overseas and the absence of a world class spinner. This is obviously why we've packed the batting order.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Which of these batsmen, not a single one of which averages 40, despite in many cases, playing most of their cricket in the Second Division, can we expect to "fire"? I do hope Hameed can make it as his talent before the slump (or before he got to the point where only Notts would want him) was positivley iridescent and it would be a joy to see him bat like that for us but if you have, or choose to assemble, a side in which no batsman averages 40 you are unlikely to have enough runs for even the best attack to bowl at.

    Did anyone believe that the best approach to our 2019 performance was more of the same? Does anyone now, when 120 odd for none has led to a highly possible sub bonus point total against a Derbyshire attack with less first class wickets than Stuart Broad has test wickets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and can we have Samit back at 5 please?

      Delete
  7. And a good innings by Jake Ball - not seen him score like that very often

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great recovery. Great signs from Evison. Great day's cricket. If we get one tonight we will hopefully be up for it in the morning. And per the cliche hopefully Jake Ball's bowling will be inspired by his good knock.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hameed shots I saw on line a total delight.

    Really looking at scores round the country Notts did OK, but still a middle order collapse to try to sort out

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can we take 10 wickets tomorrow?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hello Anonymous 15.12 posting. When I said fire i didn't mean all at the same time. I take your point as to their career averages as they are there for a reason. I was basing it more on the last stint in Div2 when Patel and Wessells or Mullaney etc would all produce something spectacular at different times, that set us up for a big total. I fully expect that with Hameed, Ducket and Clarke. I think they will all produce something over the BWT games. We are playing against some very average bowling attacks in 3 matches at least. They are not consistent however, but packing the side with batsmen will surely result in competitive totals like yesterday, even when we were the brink of the usual batting collapses of the last two seasons. Patel batting 8 does seem ridiculous but look how he slipped down the order the last time we won the County Championship back in 2010. My main point was the bowling is more of problem. We had Patto at his devastating best last time in DIv2 blowing sides away. Look at what we have now.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There's a hole in Ben Duckett dear Lisa..........

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well done to Notts for upgrading the first class visual streaming yesterday . A big improvement on last season and no doubt a costly upgrade- which is not exactly what Notts need at this difficult time financially .
    I think Dave Bracey said there were four camera operators on the ground - so the new system is an ongoing extra expense . Apart from the pictures ( with instant playback ) it was re assuring to hear the dulcet tones of Bracey and Fletcher gently easing us into the 'new" season . Dave B has his critics ( I have been one of them) but he certainly knows and loves his cricket .
    Lets hope Notts can bowl Derbyshire out cheaply and then pile on runs in the second innings and force Derbyshire into a tight corner and thus seal a well overdue 4 day victory .
    I am hoping that Jake Ball can return to his best form . A few lusty blows with the bat yesterday shows what he can do lower down . Notts will need a fit and fast Jake Ball more than ever this shortened season . Fletch is not getting any younger and may be prone to niggles that prevent him playing .
    Anyway it was wonderful to see Notts playing again at Trent Bridge and it looks as though the next three days will be rain free and we can see a positive result - A WIN FOR NOTTS !

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Pink Panther2 August 2020 at 12:35

    For all the Manchester Utd fans out there(i.e. armchair supporters) I imagine this is wonderful for them, especially those who do not subscribe to SKY as they can now watch Notts from the comfort of their sofa. For the fans that go to the games to support and watch their team play, this is scant consolation. In fact in a way it's even more irritating than not playing the games at all as we are now seeing Trent Bridge with live action but unable to get into the ground.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Inspector Clouseau2 August 2020 at 13:48

      I'm glad it's not just me PP. Allowing yourself it be irritated by it all is probably better than being dragged down into a glum sulk or depression over it however - all that potential social distancing going to waste and we can't be there because of the non-existant science theory- made up by Boris on the hoof. Why are they sanitising their hands every 6 overs? The virus isn't on any surface inside the playing area, it's not airbourne, so where are they at risk of picking up from to get it onto their hands?

      Delete
  15. Come on Notts! You'd have to think Derbys and Durham at Trent Bridge are our best chances to notch a first class win in this truncated season.

    If they can't do it, that will be ONE THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN DAYS without a first class win (i.e. from the Essex win in 2018 to opening day of the 2021 season) - that would overtake Leics 2012-15 as a post-war record in county cricket. Something to be avoided!!

    So I hope they throw everything at the afternoon sessions today, because this result really matters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, agree, if the weather doesn't intervene how can we NOT win this game ? We're against a traditionaly weak Div2 outfit minus two regular first team bowlers and no overseas ? Even this toothless Notts attack should surely be able to take 20 wckts in this game. Good to see Jake Ball back in the wckts. Too early to say he's back to somewhere approaching his best but a welcome confidence booster for him in his first game nonetheless

      Delete
  16. Whilst the streaming is better than last year, the limitations of the two fixed cameras still mean that catches and fielding within the one-day 30 yard circle are not visible. Both the catches from Chris Nash and Haseeb Hameed today were off-camera. Would also be nice to see replays of wickets on the live stream as opposed to having to look back at them separately. Also anyone else noticed the distinctly dull pink tinge on the fixed cameras?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Really poor picture quality from the fixed cameras - surely Notts can do better than this - almsot as bad as they are at getting Derbyshire's last wicket!!! All the empty seats makes a nonsense of not allowing at least some spectators in - come on Boris!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Same flawed tactic that gifted Trego a ton not so many years ago against Notts. They're not trying to get du Plooy out so he he can flash the bat with impunity and he's accepted the ton accordingly. The kid at other end has shown that he can hang around, but they still don't have the courage to change the tactics.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yet further poor captaincy by Mullaney - we all know that Samit Patel is an excellent stand breaker - so why only bowl him for 4 Overs? Good captaincy is learning from the past - Mullaney is failing to do so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fairness A699 just about every county uses that appalling tactic nowadays and it just never works. Absolutely exasperates me that Lancashire do it so often. Once when Lancashire were doing it, Tom Smith came down to the Boundry and said to the spectators “any ideas”. I responded with precisely what A609 said, ; we just weren’t trying to get Jimmy Adams out and Hampshire’s slow left armer whose name escapes me( went to Sussex I think ) was playing the one or two balls per over easily . Tom Smith actually replied to me by saying that they had come round to that conclusion now although he said “he’s never really looked like getting out has he” Completely missing the point that batsmen don’t look like getting out if you stop trying to get them. Anyway soon afterwards Adams was caught behind for 195 but the next time the same thing happened, Lancashire did exactly the same.

      Delete
  20. How is it that we swapped Ben Slater leaving for Trego joining? Was it for the quality of his bowling. Another masterpiece of cricketing know how that escapes amateurs like me perhaps. I thought that Ben was the pick of the newcomers during last year's shambles.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Slater looked good today but it really was just a workmanlike second division attack he was facing.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Slumberland recliner3 August 2020 at 15:09

    Yes, agree the armchair brigade must be loving this......the rest of us are just frustrated we can't be at the games

    ReplyDelete
  23. 366 to win - if they don't then heads must surely roll.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I didn't know that Trego was an opening bowler. Is it smart captaincy?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Up to now thought mans greatest invention was the wheel. Wrong. It's the mute button. It's like listening to an episode of Last of the summer wine but with the humorous bits taken out ?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Indeed Pj re captaincy I have to confess to irony bordering on satire. It's going to be tough for even Notts to conjure a draw or even defeat having set over 350 for a club side like Derbyshire to achieve in a fourth innings. Can it be done?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Shows what we have come to when a team we would in the past have beaten comfortably look very much like they could win this match.

    So what do we need to do?

    Captaincy seems to lying heavy on Mull's shoulder, Might it not be an idea to pass on the responsibility to Chris Nash and let Mullaney concentrate on his own game.

    Next we come to our two expensive imports of last season,You never get a feeling of security when either Duckett or Clarke are batting Perhaps they need to look at Hameed and see how much he values his wicket, Both batsmen need to learn to punish the bad balls and learn the secret of a big score is crease occupancy, You can't score runs in the pavilion.

    Hopefully Fletch will be fit for the next fixture We have clearly missed his attributes in this fixture.

    Speaking of missing players where are LPW and Matt Carter, Given we are.now in August surely there should be a case for a spinner, Yes I know Samit turns his arm over but really he should be in the side for his batting and certainly higher in the order than in this match.

    Tom Barber looks to have good pace, But accuracy is not his game,One thing we can ill afford at the moment is someone spraying it about. Either TB needs to sort out his line and length problems or his stay will be sadly short.

    Thankfully there is no county championship this season,If there was you get the horrible feeling we might replicate last seasons dismal showing and finish bottom again... This time one division lower!!

    One last thing before I go.... Get Benny Slater back from Leicestershire, We need him more than they do!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Also how did such a promising young bowling attack turn into one where a 39 year old trundled is opening the bowling, you couldn’t make it up!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Notts odds on to lose this one, great work lads!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Imagine a bowling attack of Milnes, Wood, Hutton, Ball, Fletch, how can Mick defend his position?! (Answer is he can’t), right I’ll stop now

    ReplyDelete
  31. Why am I getting a bad feeling again about how it's going to pan out

    ReplyDelete
  32. I still favour Notts to win - the target is a huge one for Derbyshire but part of me hopes Derbyshire win to increase the pressure on our feeble Committee to get rid of Mr Newell.

    ReplyDelete
  33. And just for the record - yes, I still blame the Members for continuing to support the Committee and refusing to make the Committee account for their age discrimination tactics to prevent 2 of us even standing. The Notts Committee is, I fear, a rather unhealthy one with the 'old boy' network still very much evident. I still don't know of anyone who voted for Ms. Huggard. The sooner we get the right sort of Chairman and a far more questioning and pro-active Committee the better but by the members voting for the new Nominations Committee I fear that there is even less prospect of positive change. Mr Stevenson and Ms. Peasey are up for re-election next time - we must vote them in.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Even in these days of team scoring 300 in a silly small number of overs in one day cricket, I still always tell them on the Lancashire forum that the bowling team will win nine times out of 10 in these circumstances. I would still favour Notts to win But certainly will not look good for either Notts or Lancashire if either loses to one of cricket whipping boys.

    I see the stupid tactics used by Notts yesterday were also used by Derbyshire today with the same result. Why do cricketers never learn this lesson?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yes, I also think we will win pretty comfortably today. Granted, it's not even an half decent attack, but scoreboard pressure in a 4th innings run chase is huge and that's a monster score to chase down. Everyday is different, they will most likely lose an early wicket which could then become two and suddenly the complexion of the game changes. Reg. Davy Rev above, yes, astonishing even with Fletch(and let's face it he's an average county pro that's all) injured and no overseas to put this attack out in any game is a complete shocker for our beloved Teflon Mick and most of the committee who continue to back him despite the abysmal results in red ball cricket over the last few recent seasons

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Overcast conditions always help the Bowlers so I think that Notts may well be helped today by the weather rather than by any talent on their part.

      Delete
  36. We can all bemoan the quality in the Notts attack, but it's the tactics and team culture that are as much of a worry.

    If you have a wayward quickie like Barber in your side, don't you throw him the new ball and demand four overs of short and rapid stuff at the openers? Don't you give him a leg slip and a short leg and really back him to get in the batters' ribs?

    If you must use Trego bowling slow/medium, don't you tell Moores to stand up to him and bring in stumping as an additional dismissal? He's slower that Ealham was, and I remember Reed keeping up to him regularly. The same goes for Mullaney - an 'international keeper in waiting' like Moores should have no problem standing up for these guys.

    And on culture: I know its a closed ground, but why were Notts so quiet in the field yesterday evening? A massive lead, four months stuck at home and our best chance for a win in years, and in the field there's no noise at all. It was like Sunday seconds in intensity.

    Fingers crossed for a big improvement in application this morning, and a desperately overdue win in the early afternoon!! Come on Notts.

    ReplyDelete
  37. "Come on Derbyshire!!!"

    ReplyDelete
  38. Both Derbyshire and Notts have used there wayward quicks in a similar fashion. Very strange not to use there effect to the maximum advantage with a new hard ball - yes they would leak runs (but that happens anyway if you use them) but they might pick-up wickets. Using Trego to open the bowling is a complete joke and highlights the shortcomings of those who have built the current squad over the past few years.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Looking like a draw but Derbyshire now only need 100 at around 4 per Over - "Come on Derbyshire."

    ReplyDelete
  40. Nearly 1100 watching on-line - will Derbyshire make history? Serious questions will have to be asked if Notts non-winning run continues.

    ReplyDelete
  41. 54 needed at a run a ball by Derbyshire with 3 wickets remaining - fascinating!!!

    ReplyDelete
  42. Now just 23 off 29 - I have to say that Derbyshire are showing real courage.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Heading now towards an historic Derbyshire victory - really historic if they pull it off "Come on Derbyshire."

    ReplyDelete
  44. 2 from 2 so Notts can not win.

    ReplyDelete
  45. A fabulous and fantastic win by Derbyshire - their highest run chase of all time! No Notts supporter can fail to appreciate this historic victory at the end of a wonderful 4 days BUT where do Notts go from here? - The most serious questions have to now be asked and I am clear that the Director of cricket must now go along with others probably.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hell would probably freeze over before our "esteemed" leader decides to do the right thing PJ.

      Sad facts is that he has allies all around him,Any decent CEO would have called him to task a long time ago.

      We all know why that's unlikely to happen!

      Add to that a committee that lacks anything resembling a backbone and you can see why MN can sleep easily at night.

      It says it all when you look at the Notts team in this match and realise that perhaps only 3 players can be truly satisfied with their performance, You don't tend to win many matches with those sort of figures

      We said last season Notts needed to act decisively They didn't and we saw today what's likely to happen again and again until the committee institutes real change...

      Just don't hold your breath waiting....

      Delete
  46. Well played Derbyshire. Every credit to them.

    New season for Notts but same old rubbish.

    Funny how, even this week, players who are now at other counties are doing really well but those at Trent Bridge underperform. Embarrassing is the only word for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are correct 'Anonymous' that once players leave Notts they seem to invariably do better - that has to raise serious questions about the Coaches and the Director of Cricket. It seems that whatever pressures they were under at Notts evaporate and they start to prosper - let's hope the reverse happens for Hameed on his arrival AT Notts.

      Delete
  47. Yes totally agree about Derbyshire, superb for them and no sour grapes.

    Notts are a basket case. Last season Patterson-White took 40 FC wickets at 20 apiece. On day 4 in August you need to have at least one wicket taking spin bowler. Patel is no longer that , worth his place as a batsman, but not a bowler in the FC game.


    The selection of Trego and Nash is too much, team too old and slow .We need youth and new blood. Duckett is doing nothing


    The situation is so bad, I bet they drop Joey Evision, the club have become that stupid

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that again Mullaney's captaincy has to be questioned - did her persist for too long at the end with Ball and Patel when the batsmen had clearly got used to them?

      Delete
  48. The positives that Notts can take from this game were the return to form of Jake Ball, the application of Hameed, Samit at his fluent best and the promising all round talent of Evison.

    Unfortunately, Ball by in large had to carry an ill equipped bowling attack for a four day game, and in terms of batting, the same culprits failed again as they repeatedly did last season.

    For me Duckett lacks technique and application, Clarke looks a soft cricketer, and young Moores gets frustrated too easily when he gets bogged down.

    With limited bowling options, I would have thought that preparing a pitch for spin would be Notts best prospect of competing for the forthcoming fixtures, and selecting both Carter and Patterson White, at the expense of Duckett and Barber.


    ReplyDelete
  49. I'm struggling to remember a lower point in Notts history. I go back to Brian Bolus et al so it's quite a while. Surely now the triumvirate in charge will step down as their disastrous management has delivered us one humiliation after another. It's enough please go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have well hit rock bottom yet?

      Delete
    2. Of the 16 defeats since our last victory, that was the narrowest.

      Delete
    3. Rock bottom? No - that was only the first match of the season.

      Delete
    4. OK -'David' - so when did Notts last WIn a County Championship game? It matters not that this is 'only the first match of the season' but that it IS another in a long disatrous line of failing to win. Members have received too many excuses from the Director of Cricket and the Head Coach - there are NO MORE EXCUSES which will satisfy members and I hope no more that our feeble Committee will accept. THEY have a responsibility to ensure matters improve - so what is Jason Gallian doing still on the Committee along with Peter Wright; Chairman Richard and others who continue to demonstrate a spineless approach?

      Delete
    5. I suspect David means, it's the first match of the season so we can drop even lower. A defeat against the Tykes wouldn't necessarily mean a lower point than now but a defeat against Leicestershire ..... well

      Delete
    6. Yes, that is what I meant. I can see a difficult couple of months ahead.

      Delete
  50. I suspect Newell and Moores were secretly hoping that this season would be called off, so that they could both still draw a decent salary without any inquisition.

    If we get stuffed by the Yorkies, which is likely, the cries for their joint dismissals will get louder and louder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you had been undecided about taking a refund of your Membership, they have probably done you a favour.

      Delete
    2. But Peter Moores is "proud" of this Notts performance - should he be?

      Delete
  51. This team is absolute garbage full of old timers who offer nothing and big time charlies who offer even less, things will only change by getting rid of Moore’s and Newell and that aint going to happen, genuinely have no hope for this team

    ReplyDelete
  52. Just as I thought it would pan out last night another embarrassing loss but well played to Derbyshire . As per usual no criticism from the girdler

    ReplyDelete
  53. I have just watched Peter Moores quixotic post-match review on the Notts website, full of its bouncings back and good shifts and key moments won. It seemed an intensely relaxed summation of a major defeat to a lowly (if very competitive and organised) local rival. Hmm.

    The only purpose of the next month must surely be to blood the squad that will go on to win Division Two in 2021. There is nothing else to focus on or play for, and there shouldn't be any other ambition for the management.

    So the main question facing the club must be 'is the current squad as good or better as the one we needed to get promoted in 2017?'

    If the answer is 'yes', then they can use this month as a chance to hone a style of play, tactics, and bowling/batting partnerships. It's a great practice opportunity.

    But if the answer is 'no', then a very big set of changes are needed. A new plan, a la the Andy Flower turnaround strategy, must be required if we're not to join our counterparts in the perpetual bottom three of Div 2.

    It's so upsetting to say that, when listening to Mr Moores and watching his FC sides on the field, I have no sense that there is any strategy, plan, or wider ambition there at all. It's sport on autopilot, played by a team that might look a million dollars in the nets but have no belief in itself in the middle.

    Ramble over! Loved the live feed improvements though, and brilliant to have some cricket on to grumble over.

    ReplyDelete
  54. The Pinky Panther5 August 2020 at 06:25

    Pete Moores is unrecognisable from the bloke that came to us from Lanky a few seasons ago now, initially as coaching consultant. He probably doesn't know what to say with the current mob of old timers, under achievers and arch bottlers. Full credit to Direbyshire. Small outfit, low budget and get their best players nicked by other counties. Teflon Mick apparently joked we had signed players from P*** Poor counties at the Gala Dinner ceremony I believe. Would it not be more accurate to describe him as VERY P*** Poor Director of Cricket supported by a committee who are now surely an embarrassment to this great club of ours ?

    ReplyDelete
  55. Derbyshire did well and used all the resources they had at their disposal and played it to a tea. I enjoyed the live stream , less is more in terms of replays and great not to be interrupted by adverts.
    don't think I can add anything more to most of the other comments above.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Dave Bricegoodle5 August 2020 at 08:44

    Unlucky Notts. All eleven played with the pride, commitment and passion we've been promised all year. Winter recruitment impeccable. Unable to criticise anything, for once, this time out.

    ReplyDelete
  57. When was the last time you read in a report "... inspired captaincy by Skipper Steven Mullaney"? You won't find one, I've googled it! So where do you think the on field problems might start?

    We all know where the off field/external counter-to-success influences are!

    We are unlikely to make the final of this one-off competition now so let's prepare for 2021 and make the drastic, necessary changes now!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, well said A609 I completely agree, although who on Earth could captain this rabble any better must be debatable. Also you're overlooking two small aspects A) the club care about members and red ball cricket and B) the Notts committee care about the club and its members as they clearly do not, the exceptions to this are members D.P. and R.S. who do genuinely care and are committed. I assume they must be let down by their other colleagues as to why nothing ever changes despite this run of disaster results and performances

      Delete
  58. The committee up to this point have been elected by the members. So we get what we deserve. (some might question the legitimacy of the count perhaps, but we only mix within our own circle of friends at the Bridge and can't evaluate others that we have no connection or contact with - they too might be complete muppets, but they might actually believe the twaddle that we are being told). The club is doomed however once there are anymore of LP's and RT's stooges on the board. We won't just be just slipping into the abyss (as now), we'll be sliding. Metaphor Time: If we are going to make a decent, tasty ommelette, we need to not only crack some eggs, but get fresh ingredients and for that matter let's get some new utensils and cooking pan. The Trent Bridge chef needs a new recipe as well or perhaps Trent Bridge needs a new chef.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apart from RS & DP I wonder who else has the courage to put their heads above the parapet and speak out. Is P F-M on the right side? Are the 2 ladies just stooges for the CEO? Why was PW persuaded to stand again for the Committee other than to try to make sure Chairman Richard got his way. The Director of Cricket in his statement about "p.ss poor sides" was surely including Notts in that!!!The Committee now needs to act and get rid of MN and PM on the grounds of poor performances over the last 2 Seasons - in any contest over alleged Unfair Dismissal I am sure that the Club would be successful. Our Head Coach was "proud" of yesterday's defeated Side - it makes me wonder what would dent that pride - perhaps Notts only losing by an Innings! We are in dire trouble - it is just 'more of the same' - there remains something deeply worrying and troubling at the highest levels in the Club - we urgently need new personnel on the Committee and at CEO / DoC levels.

      Delete
  59. Yes, Metaphor Man you are spot on with that but how many members really know who they are voting for, if they even bother voting at all ? A lot have impressive CVs and resumes based on their professional and business careers but of these just how many are really committed to the performances of the Notts team on the actual field or standing up for the county red ball members ? Up to this year everything in the garden was rosy in terms of club finances, meaning poor results for the team could just be swept under the carpet with no repercussions seemingly. Will there be some sort of shake up at some point now? We have had no money spinning international games at TB this season, very probably no spectators spending at T20 games and this would be massively reduced capacity even in the best case scenario and by all accounts(no pun intended) a loss making fine dining Restaurant that we would appear to be saddled with.

    ReplyDelete
  60. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why delete your supportive comments about Steven Mullaney Richard? Your comments are always fair, valued, relevent and welcome.

      Delete
    2. I support Steve 100 %

      Sorry for any misunderstanding on that, he is a top guy and proud he is skipper of our team

      I deleted as I thought my post just repeated what others had already said

      Delete
  61. If only someone could speak the truth. Disgrace of club from top to bottom.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Ref the Notts v Derby match that ended yesterday . THE WINNER WAS CRICKET !Notably the 4 day game .I agree both sides are mediocre in most departments but they produces a fine game of cricket - the type of which we have sorely missed in recent months .All those watching the excellent live stream and listening to Bracey and Fletch,s ball by ball commentary must have been drained when the match ended . With only a few balls to go it was possible to get three different results - and that after four days play .
    Ok - some passages in the game itself were tedious and slow but surely the four day game has bound to have periods when very little is happening . This is when the commentators have a difficult job . I did notice this time that during the whole 4 days only TWO commentators were used - . last season there was always three and sometimes four . Is the reduction part of a "cuts" package or was it more to do with social distancing ? Probably the latter. But it cant be easy to make four days of play interesting and constantly informative .I have been critical of Dave Bracegirdle in the past but I think on balance him and Derbyshires Fletch did a reasonable job . Dave is obviously friendly with all the players and it could be difficult not to put the players backs up by saying what sometimes needs to be said .Do you really bite the hand that feeds you ? Its a tricky one -and we all have our opinions .
    To be honest ,after all these Coronavirus ups and downs it was a relief to actually see and here some proper cricket being played .
    I suppose being realistic there is now zero chance of any spectators being allowed in to T B to see any County cricket this year . I would hazard a guess at perhaps a 25% chance os some members being allowed in to watch some of the Blast20 competition .
    Looking at the various news headlines today there seems to be a real chance of a second wave of infection in the UK .Its happening now in other parts of Europe .
    So lets congratulate unfashionable Derby on a thrilling victory yesterday - played in the right spirit by all accounts . As for Notts - well the wretched losing run goes on and on .
    Well done to the Notts players who gave their all - Jake Ball and Samit in particular plus one or two others who played well . As to the ones who were pretty mediocre -- well they know who they are .
    Lets wish Notts the best of luck and somehow generate the will and skill to beat
    Yorkshire over the weekend
    PS Just a footnote - I wonder if anyone on here took advantage of the 50/1 available odds on Derby to win the match ? Those odds were only offered for an hour or two but with hindsight Rodney we would all be m++++++++++s !

    ReplyDelete
  63. That's very generous of you 75no. I'll have to work very hard to feel positive about the decline of the club, that I love, as was displayed v derbys. I'll try as soon as my anger subsides

    ReplyDelete
  64. I agree with 75 no it was so good to see cricket again and an enthralling match, albeit a bit of a featherweight contest. Cricket behind closed doors is not a concept that originally sat comfortable with me but it's far better than no cricket at all. The game dynamics though are different, would for instance Derbyshire have successfully chased that target with a crowd in at the game, obviously we will never know, but even a small crowd can put pressure on batsman and bowlers doing the key phases of the play. It's almost as if in future you have to asterisk against any record achieved in 2020 with a footnote of Played behind closed doors.

    If you look around the Bob Willis Trophy many weak elevens were out on the pitch due to the greater than normal number of players on international duty, a less than normal number in the kolpak contingent and no overseas players. It makes the tournament a bit of a Mickey Mouse affair almost five glorified first-class friendlies. With no second team competition this season, teams are forced to give their fringe players, particularly those on the last year of their contract some game time, hence the inclusion of Barber in the Notts line up. I expect to see other fringe layers given a go in the remaining games. My understanding is that there is no prize money for winning the BWT whereas there is money on offer for the Blast. We all know where Notts priorities lie.

    I think Dave Bracegirdle and his sidekick Fletcher did a very good job, it's not easy for anyone to keep talking for four long days, it's hard work and they certainly don't get paid Gary Lineker rates, if you don't like them then mute them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would beg to differ on the subject of Statler and Waldorf - Dave and Dave. Sometimes, less is more with commentary. You don't need inane ramblings all the time and get them a monitor so they can inform on what we can see not blather on about EMA landngs and take-offs every quarter of an hour.

      Delete
  65. Notts default position, if you get beat it's a Mickey mouse competition. Not sure Yorks are seeing it that way on Sat when they arrive with Bairstow, Malan,Olivier and Willey. Thank God for Notts Coad, Fisher and Ballance are injured. All from top to bottom at Notts have to accept they are currently at the standard of Derby, Leics and Glam.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said A46(N) people can bang on, myself included, over DoubleCorsetts bland commentary and the frustrations of having to watch it streamed.....the real problem is the current Notts team surely ?

      Delete
  66. Very well said both 75no and Mag, agree with both contributors 100 percent. But as for the state of Notts cricket................well, that's a completely different story

    ReplyDelete
  67. A Road to Nowhere5 August 2020 at 22:35

    If it's the case that players with one year to run on their contacts are getting time in the middle in "competitive" matches, does this mean that Blatherwick will be playing against the Yorkies?

    I agree Bracegargoyle is best heard on mute.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would like Bkathetwick to play. In his one match last season I thought he bowled pretty well and his figures perhaps reflect.

      If we did have a change if guard re team management and a hardened pro coach came in with no previous link to the club, it would be fascinating to see who that person would and would not select

      Delete
  68. Jake Ball probably deserves a week off but who would you replace him with? Fletch has to return, with Evison injured(??). Switch Sweeney Todd with High Chappelle. It's looking a bit bleak unless someone finds some form.

    Need a pitch doctor, then play three spinners.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Speaking of pitch doctor, I’ve not seen Ron Alsop on the ground for a long time, any news anyone?

      Delete
  69. Not sure, loved Ron
    Happy memories !

    By the way applause for the 100 for this thread !

    Clearly we do still care about our county who seem to be in the doldrums big time

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First time we've had 100 or more comments on one post / match. I guess folk have missed the cricket and the emotions that it stirs.

      Delete
  70. Appears BIG Fletch is out the next two games. Who knows what the tactics will be to suit our popgun attack. Even last seasons plan of preparing a day3 turner from the outset and bringing in the brilliant Ravi Ashwin backfired on us as batters suddenly decided they couldn't play spin either. Blatherwick seems to have disappeared somewhat and then there's always the Chappel of rest conundrum? At least the Head Coach admits the fast bowling options are "somewhere short of where we need to be" Guess this is what happens when Milns, Seabiscuit(Wood) and Coughlin all decide to up sticks to different counties and you replace them with a medium pacer aged 39 and a bowler released by Middlesex who hadn't taken a FC wicket prior to this game. What about a good old Mick Newell 'result' pitch of pure desperation, where the games done and dusted in 2 and a half days, battings a complete lottery for everyone but you just hope someone can slog a quick 70 that gives you an over par score of 220. I'm sure all the Nottsview faithful will recall those games when we were desperate for a result ?

    ReplyDelete
  71. James Weighell has gone on loan from Durham to Leicester he would have been a good signing for us, but unfortunately Notts missed the boat. Just as they did with David Bedingham who was playing for Plumtree last season and also keeps wicket. Never even given a trial by a seconds last season and then scores 77 on his debut for Durham this week. Never mind maybe Chappell might take a wicket this weekend!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leicester Piglet6 August 2020 at 19:42

      No Fletcher for two more games either. Jake Ball will be run into the ground unless Zak Chappell and or Tom Barber workout what they are supposed to do when they have ball in hand. Is Joey Evison going to be fit for Saturday? 4 years ago we were the envy of most of the other 17 counties with the thorough-bred seam bowlers that we had stabled at Trent Bridge. Now we open the bowling with a 39 year old nag medium paced trundler who's just escaped from the glue factory.

      Delete
    2. No doubt both Slater and Weighell have been loaned out for nowt, unless Leicester have found an Alan Sugar daddy to provide some much needed funds.

      In Weighell's case, he has suffered numerous injuries, and the last time I saw him on Murdoch TV ,he was well down on pace.
      Having said that, if you had to choose between him and Chapple then the decision is an easy one.

      On the wicket keeper issue, Mr Moores , I am sure, would not want to sign a local keeper who would undoubtedly expose the shortcomings of his son, with both bat and gloves.

      Delete
  72. What a complete and utter mess! Looking back reckon this really stems from lack of preparation and foresight in 2015/16 for the expected retirement in 2017 of a world class keeper and captain in Chris Reed. Post Read has seen the departure of quality players either deciding first class cricket wasn’t for them or that their future lay with other countries. Would be interesting to know what were all their real reasons for leaving.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I could go on for days but briefly in my view this started when we chose to dismantle our fine championship-winning side of 2010 before the champagne was even flat. In particular with Ryan Sidebottom in the side we would I firmly believe have won at least one if not two or even three further championships in the subsequent seasons. Instead we had to watch Ryan and his Yorkshire team mates at Trent Bridge celebrating his/their third championship in five years - that is five years after we refused to give him a three year contract (but instead recruited a very lovely and entertaining but non-wicket-taking bowler who was two years OLDER than Sid).

      One 40 over win and I think 1 20/20 finals day from 2011 to 2015 represented continual underachievement for our club and personnel. But then came the shameful performance in 2016. Even without it being the sixth year of underachievement the manager/coach should have gone after that debacle but he was kicked upstairs and is blighting the team still.

      We now know that the glorious one day form of 2017 was the blip and the miserable embarrassing 2016 form is the norm. Indeed it got much worse in 2019 culminating in an inability to score 12 off 12 balls in a 20/20 with 8 wickets in hand. Yet the response to that, which even this committee publicly acknowledges was "unacceptable" was more of the same.

      All credit to Derbyshire and I am proud of the gracious response to their fine efforts on here but the list of the qualities which gave them their wonderful last day performance and thus their fine victory: belief, commitment, individually and to the collective cause, sense - general and tactical, mental strength, professionalism, pride, sheer bloody-mindedness, identifying and seizing the key moments, refusing to be distracted or diverted or chastened by setbacks or to accept the "inevitable", and ruthlessness when they had an advantage - causes a Notts fan to squirm.

      Delete
    2. A totally brilliant summing up Anon. Whoever you are pls keep posting again with your fantastic cricket knowledge and logic of our dire situation

      Delete
    3. Leadership was the issue in 2016 and leadership has remained an issue ever-since.

      Delete
  73. All these fine and indeed accurate words / analyses are useless without some positive ACTIONS. Our Committee has much to answer for because the buck stops with them. Chairman Richard and his merry band of comrades clearly care little about cricket and more about their own friendships and comaraderie - and perhaps some of the perks that go with their positions.

    How can Jason Gallian and his cricket Committee be made to account for their efforts? And Jason will soon have to make a clear decision whether to remain on the Committee once he officially becomes an employee of the Club - he is already sailing close to the wind ethically, I believe.

    The Committeee employ all of the staff - so if they can HIRE them what stops them FIRING them?

    Ultimately, of course, we remain a MEMBERS CLUB - so one has to presume that the majority of members are content - very few ever Vote and even even less are active in trying to achieve positive changes.

    When the ECB says "jump" OUR Committee ask "how high?" - they are puppets of the ECB.

    So, surely someone with some clout can help galvanise all of this unhappiness and discontent - surely???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PJ you have character assassinated the wrong target. Jason Gallian is innocent of all your unfounded charges. Try another former opening batsman, we have a long list.

      Delete
    2. 'Nottsviewer' - Jason is on the Cricket Committee! What makes you think that he is beyond criticism? When did he last speak up at either a Members Forum or AGM?

      Delete
    3. Jason Gallian lives in Stebbing, Essex and works at Felsted School. He is not on the Notts Committee. You have confused him with someone else.

      Delete
    4. I think he means Bickers ( Darren Bicknall) not JG, unless he is no longer on the committee.

      Delete
    5. Coaches the u15s for the Notts Cricket Board which will soon come under NCCC. Being on the NCCC committee and being an employee of NCCC will be a problem for Mr Bicknell but it's not something of his own doing. As a committee member, I am told he one that is resistant to changes of managerial personnel.

      Delete
  74. I'm sure there's a sad joke there involving: puppets, ECB holding purse-strings and Ms Pursehouse

    ReplyDelete
  75. Of course I meant to say Darren Bicknell - apologies to Jason (in 1996 he hammered 312 against Derbyshire, the highest score at Old Trafford - but grew increasingly disenchanted and moved to Nottinghamshire in pursuit of new challenges at the end of the following season. He was subsequently appointed Notts Captain but continued to be dogged by injury).

    My concerns regarding Bicknell as an ex-player (and certainly a good one when looking at the present squad) is that he surely knows that things are not right and haven't been for some time now but he DOES act as a Coach and remains on the cricket Committee - so he too has to share perhaps a greater degree of accountability than the non-Cricket Committeee Committee Members. His position ass a Coach (albeit not, as yet, directly employed by the Club) and a Committee member COULD be regarded as being a conflict of interests, although I would have hoped that his far greater knowledge and insight than mine would have seen him speaking out and joining together with other concerned Committee members who would like to have seen a new Chairman before now and the DoC, especially, being removed from his Post. Darren appears well-liked and popular but is that more as a result of 'past glories' as a player than his abilities as a Committee member?

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts...