28 August, 2020

Division Three - Here We Come!

 


County Championship set for radical overhaul with three conferences of six culminating in annual Lord's final

The restructuring is viewed as the best way to ensure the vibrancy - and long-term viability - of all 18 counties


Tim Wigmore - Daily Telegragh


County cricket is poised for its most radical changes in a generation, with the County Championship set to be played in three conferences of six, culminating in an annual final at Lord’s. 

Telegraph Sport revealed earlier this month that the success of the Bob Willis Trophy was leading to a push to replace the two-division Championship with an annual competition in which all 18 first-class counties could win. Such a structure is seen as a way to revive interest in the domestic first-class game.

The new format would entail:

  • Three conferences of six, with each team playing the others in the conference home and away
  • The top two teams in each conference would proceed to Division One, where they would play the top two teams from the other two conferences. Other teams would advance to Division Two and Three
  • All counties would continue to play at least 14 Championship games - the same figure as in 2019
  • The top two teams in Division One would then meet in the five-day final at Lord’s - for which it is hoped that England players would be available - which would become the showpiece of the domestic first-class game 

A conference call between chief executives from the 18 counties on Thursday revealed very strong support for this model, which is proposed in a draft document circulated to county chief executives by the Professional Game Group, a body that represent the county game. The restructuring is viewed as the best way to ensure the vibrancy - and long-term viability - of all 18 counties. 

Chief executives are now giving feedback, with a view to agreeing a final proposal in a matter of days. The changes would then need to be agreed by the ECB’s cricket committee - which is not anticipated to be a problem - and ratified by at least 12 of the 18 counties. It is anticipated that the restructuring will now be confirmed by early October, allowing the domestic fixture list to come out in November as normal. 

Each season, the 18 teams in the County Championship would be divided into three conferences of six, and seeded based upon their performances in the previous season. For the first iteration, the conferences would be based upon finishing positions in the 2019 County Championship, with this option set to be preferred to a regional model previously considered. The conferences would be designed to be of equal strength - so the top-ranked team in the previous year would be in conference one, the second in conference two, the third in conference three and then the fourth in conference one, and so on. 

The top two teams in each conference would advance to Division One. They would carry forward their results against the other side to advance from their conference and then play a game each against the other four teams to advance to Division One. An identical structure would be used for teams advancing to Division Two and Three.

While only Division One would have a final, prize money would be designed to give fixtures in Division Two and Three meaning, with the bottom four teams in Division Three receiving no prize money at all. 

The reforms are seen as a way to reinvigorate the English first-class game. It is hoped that the system would keep alive interest in all 18 first-class counties and discourage local players from leaving for bigger counties - the draft proposal references reducing agents’ power by removing the perception of Division Two as a “graveyard” - while maintaining a best v best element. 

The annual five-day Lord’s final is considered essential. This would begin in late September but could culminate in October. It would generate new interest in the county game, with the hope that England’s schedule will allow their leading Test players to appear in this game.

The proposals for the final are that the team who finished second in Division One would need to win to lift the Championship title, with the top team in Division One lifting the trophy in the event of a draw. In the conferences and divisions, the system of bonus points is likely to revert to that used in 2019. 

The proposed schedule envisages the 10 conference games per county being played from April until the end of June, with the T20 Blast - played in two regional groups of nine - beginning in late May. The T20 Blast would then finish in mid-July, with the Royal London One-Day Cup played alongside the Hundred until late August. There remains a long-term ambition to involve the national counties in the One-Day Cup, as Telegraph Sport first revealed, but - partly due to Covid-19 - the competition will be played in two groups of nine next season. 

The knockout stages of the T20 Blast would then be played in late August, before the three divisions of the Championship were played in September, with this segment of the competition likely to be marketed under the moniker ‘Race to Lord’s’.

Attention has also been given to how to ‘Covid-proof’ the 2021 domestic season. Telegraph Sport understands that two potential season structures have been prepared - one if crowds of at least 50 per cent are permitted before next April, and one if they are still not.

In the second scenario, the domestic fixture list would be revised so that the T20 Blast does not begin until August, maximising the chances of more fans being able to attend games. Under these proposals, finals day of the T20 Blast could be played at the very start of October as it is this year, when finals day is staged on October 3. If Covid-19 remains a major issue next summer, the regional format of this year’s Bob Willis Trophy could be retained in the conference stage of the domestic first-class competition. 


12 comments:

  1. So can we expect that Notts will openly consult Members and conduct a democratic vote?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow!
    A lot to take in and consider?
    I need someone with more intelligence than me to list the pros and cons of the proposals.
    I am a little concerned about a FIVE DAY PLAY OFF FINAL taking place partly in October. Look at the average temperatures and rainfall for that month. May be a pretty cold and drab experience sitting in the damp and cold .
    However its nice to see some original thinking taking place.
    Ref the Blast 20 and 100 Competitions . A 50% max spectator attendance would mean circa 8,000 limit per game at TB How would that fit into the necessary revenue stream reqired to keep Notts balance sheet healthy?
    These proposals should generate much comment on here- So lets have a lively debate which can point out the advantages and pitfalls. Plenty on here have intelligent views so I look forward to reading some.
    I am open minded about the proposed new 4 day game structure as its pretty obvious that something pretty radical is required to save the longer game format.
    Look forward to comments from MAG /HBD/ and the usual band of keen crucket fans plus new ones who post for the first time

    ReplyDelete
  3. This thread is headed
    DIVISION 3 here we come!
    This conjures up a vision of a clapped out side struggling to compete?
    Well we seem unable to beat so called weaker teams like Derby and Leic.
    So p
    SO PERHAPS WE ARE NOW A PRETTY AVERAGE DIVISION 3 OUTFIT?

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you based groups on 2019 championship positions i.e. Group A 1,4,7,10,13,16 Group B 2,5,8,11,14,17 Group C 3,6,9,12,15,18 then you would get

    Group A
    Essex
    Kent
    Warwickshire
    Northants
    Durham
    Middlesex

    Group B
    Somerset
    Yorkshire
    Notts
    Glos
    Sussex
    Worcs

    Group C
    Hampshire
    Surrey
    Lancashire
    Glamorgan
    Derby
    Leics

    ReplyDelete
  5. Group B with Notts in it means a lot of travel to see away games!
    Pity we cant be in Group C

    ReplyDelete
  6. Are we really Div 3? Since we last won we have only lost to 8 individual counties, six counties we haven't even played at all. In MAG's Group B we have only lost to two of that Group in the last 2 years but I'm sure someone can tells us when we last lost to Gloucs, Sussex and Worcester.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Taken as a whole I’m enjoying the Bob Willis trophy (if not the clubs results in it).I've got a sneaky feeling that something like it may be back next year perhaps because of the continued pandemic restrictions.so some sort of change may happen by accident or by stealth.
    It’s then up to the individual club to decide how much of a priority they are going to throw behind it.not much in some cases which would be a pity.
    Not likely to go back to the old one division system but every club started with a new chance each season, what was wrong with that?
    I can remember Gloucestershire finishing bottom one year , only for the same set of players to enjoy a blinding season the following year and coming 3rd.
    They say there was a lot of meaningless games towards the end of a season,but need there be? With nothing to play for young players should be used and given experience, they may even win a few games.this should be encouraged whatever format the championship takes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It county playing staffs are to be trimmed-down as speculated widely, post covid; how does playing the Hundred along side the 50 over cup competition work for those counties that had seen a lot of drafted players. Also, if at 50% capacity, where is there any value in the Hundred at all (growth wise) and counties being restricted to out grounds for the cup games (their HQs being off limits because of the Hundred).

    ReplyDelete
  9. Notts Viewer - I accept your points made
    But reference the 100 Ball Comp.
    Arent the ECB/ SKY/ BBC RELYING ON EVER INCREASING TV VIEWING FIGURES?
    The actual attendance at each televised match would be partly irrelevant.
    I an pretty sure I read that our 100 Ball comp could be sold to other Countries and thus increasing the revenue stream from a product that is 100% owned by the ECB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. During this difficult time haven't we seen at least one upside - the BBC being prepared to show cricket again on mainstream free to air TV. Are they soon to show a live T20 International? Sky see the benefit of a potential growing interest by allowing their monopoly to be relaxed and BBC seem to have got over themselves by being able to fit a 3 hour event into schedules, when before that was impossible. A win win there. So why the need for a 4th format? If the demand was ever there before Covid, it is certainly less now post-Covid. Jazz up the Blast a bit and no one will notice the difference, it will still sell overseas.

      Delete
  10. Its a complicated scenario alright. A lot of potential permutations. So we have got to get it right first time.
    When you stop and think about it , is it over ambitious to hope for four separate competitions to be successful ?
    Its packing a lot of games into a pretty tight schedule.
    Its blindingly obvious that the Countrys main summer game ( cricket) should be shown on free to air TV.
    The future good of the game may well deoend on increased expisure to a wider audience. I dont have SKY SPORTS package . So when was the last time my household watched ” live” cricket?
    Its so long ago that I cant remember the year.
    In the long term which will be the better draw to a TV live audience
    The Blast 20 Comp
    Or the 100 Ball Comp?

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1999 so tomorrow's game on BBC again will have been a long wait. But no one blame SKY for this situation. They have saved cricket for us. The BBC decided they would not cover it anymore, so Channel 4 took over. They then decided that 2005 would be it for them which is ironic as cricket got a huge lift and the Nation behind it as this was when KP and Flintoff battered the that great Aussie side to win back the Ashes. It's a nightmare for broadcasters to cover. I think SKY use 20 cameras, it takes up huge airtime and of course unlike almost all other sports.....play can never be guaranteed from one day to the other. Nobody wanted cricket anymore so thank goodness SKY arrived with their finances. What would have happened to our game if they hadn't I dread to think.

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts...