Sunday 11 April 2021

Durham LV= Championship at Trent Bridge Draw



JAMES THE HIGHLIGHT AS NOTTS EARN A HARD FOUGHT DRAW


Day 4

A very dogged rearguard action, led by the superb Lyndon James meant that Notts started their County Championship campaign with a deserved draw against Durham, battling against the handicap of injuries to Jake Ball and Brett Hutton. As expected Durham declared overnight setting Notts a nominal 396 andonce again the new ball created early trouble. Notts losing Hameed and Duckett to Chris Rushworth in the first nine overs. Once the new ball lost its shine,batting became much easier, but Durham removed Clarke (38) on the stroke of lunch. Flurries of snow appeared after lunch with James joining Slater in the middle. It was vital that James stood firm and he passed his test. Slater faced 158 balls without given a chance until he was leg before to Durham skipper Scott Borthwick for 73, seven balls later an early tea was taken with 4 overs lost as the snow got heavier. James, though, batting with great patience and concentration was looking increasing assured and added 114 with his captain before after aball change saw Mullaney (69) bowled by a ball that kept low. With the sun now out,the captains shook hands just after six o’clock with 51 balls remaining.

Rushworth (Radcliffe Road End) and Salisbury (Pavilion End) opened thebowling on a very cold morning. Hameed looked a bag of nerves and never look settled and was bowled through the gate by Chris Rushworth for a 15 ball duckin the 5th over, 5 for one. Duckett was plumb leg before to Rushworth playing back to a full length ball for 12, 21 for two off nine overs. Next over, Raine replaced Salisbury. Rushworth bowled an outstanding first spell of 6-2-9-2 andon came Brydon Carse. Clarke played a number of pleasing drives off Carse andRaine, the latter being replaced by Salisbury in the 18th over. An edged fourthrough third man off Carse by Clarke brought up the 50 partnership between him and Slater off 56 balls. Durham bowled six successive maidens and then with lunch imminent Clarke (38) edged Salisbury to Bedingham at first slip, Notts 88 for 3 off 27.2 overs with Slater 35 not out.

Salisbury and Carse were in tandem after lunch just before 1400 with the sun out a fewsnow flurries started falling. Slater got to a measured 50 off 109 ballswith a single off Carse. Rushworth returned in the 34th over. The floodlightswere switched on at 1435 as Borthwick entered the attack in the 42nd over asthe 50 partnership between Slater and James came up in 15 overs. It came as a surprise when Slater (73 with 10 fours) was leg before to Borthwick going for attempted pull shot, 159 for 4 off 48 overs. Slater’s innings was chanceless. Immediately after taking the wicket, Borthwick took himself off and on came Rushworth. After one ball had been delivered, a further snow furry stopped play at 1508with Notts 161 for 4 off 49.1 overs with James on 28 and Mullaney on 1.

Play restarted at 1545 in bright sunshine with four overs lost. Rushworth switched to the Radcliffe Road End. Salisbury tested Mullaney with a short ball and he hooked hIm for six. James who had been batting circumspectly hitSalisbury for successive fours to pass his previous career best of 36 not out madeat Grace Road last year. A cover drive from Mullaney off Raine saw the 50 partnership with James come up in 112 balls. James got to a richly deserved 50 off 106 balls with a single off Borthwick. A four backward of square by Mullaney off a Carse saw him to 50 off 81 balls and take Notts passed 250. The 100 partnership came up in 27 overs. A full toss from Borthwick was smashed for six over mid wicket, the over going for 10 plus four leg byes. Borthwick bowling a long spell to improve the over rate. Notts entered the last hour on 273 for 4 off 76 overs. Salisbury returned for the 70th over and was hit for a huge six over mid wicket by Mullaney but the ball was replaced and the very next ball Mullaney was bowled for 69 off 97 balls (9x4,3x6) by a delivery that kept low, 283 for five. The new ball was taken with Notts 286 for five off 80 overs.Durham called it quits at 1802 after 21 balls bowled with the new ball. Notts 298 for 5. James, in only his third game, 79 not out off 155 balls (11x4) and Moores 7 not out. Ultimately the flat pitch proved to be the winner. Rushworth and Salisbury both taking two wickets.

The performance of 22 year old James was the highlight, a big shot in the arm for all Notts supporters who have been crying out for years for the club to back local talent; it was particularly pleasing to see a batsman finally appear from the Academy. Six of the eleven playing in this match were locally produced playersand this has to be way forward for Notts in the longer format game. The season has to be one of consolidation with this greater emphasis on promoting and nurturing young home grown players something I think the supporters would appreciate andI think accept in the short term. Please no more journeymen!!! MAG




Jake Libby carried his bat 180* today for Worcestershire...

Day 3

RECORD DURHAM PAIR PUMMEL FLAGGING NOTTS 

Notts will need to bat 96 overs tomorrow to earn a draw as Durham lead by 395 runs with six second innings wickets still standing. Notts without lynch pin Jake Ball bowled well to reduce Durham to 78 for 4, but then former Plumtree batsman David Bedingham with a career best 180 not out and Ned Eckersley with 113* broke the Durham fifth wicket partnership record by adding an unbroken 254 for the fifth wicket in 47 overs. The previous fifth record stand was 247 between Gordon Muchall and Ian Blackwell versus Worcester at New Road in 2011. Before lunch Notts had added 102 to their overnight total as Tom Moores batted excellently for 96 not out and Brett Hutton scored a fighting 51. Notts lost Brett Hutton early in last session and the attack became very threadbare as the two batsmen added an incredible 237 in 43 overs of carnage as Notts heads visibly dropped in the early evening murk. Wickets have fallen against the new ball in all three innings but the ease that the Durham pair batted in the last session suggested the wicket remains flat and you would hope that Notts have sufficiently fight to stave off the defeat.

Carse (Radcliffe Road) and Raine (Pavilion End)opened the bowling on a cold dank day were the rain stayed away and 102.2 overs were bowled. In the 51st over a driven four from Moores saw Notts beyond the follow-on total of 181. Next over, Hutton (24) was dropped at first slip by Bedingham off Carse, the next three balls went for 2,4,4 as the 50 partnership between him and Moores was achieved. After expensive mini spell from Carse, Rushworth came on. In the following over a four through square leg by Hutton off Raine saw Notts to their first batting point in the 56th over. Amid-wicket boundary off Rushworth saw Moores to his 50 off 92 balls. With the partnership growing, Borthwick came on with his leg spinners in the 60th over. Carse replaced Rushworth from the Radcliffe Road End in the 65th over. Immediately after reaching his 50 Hutton fell leg before to the returning Salisbury, for 51 off 72 balls (8x4) 230 for eight. The partnership had added 89 runs. Fletcher fell for a two-ball duck beaten for pace by a well pitched up delivery from Carse, 231 for nine. Moores hit Carse for a six over long leg,the first six of the game. Notts fortuitously got to 250 as Burnham not only dropped Moores on 79 at long leg and threw the ball for four; the ball swirling in the icy breeze. Moores hit Salisbury for consecutive fours to move to 96, but the very next ball saw Ball yorked by Carse for 4, Notts 267 all out. Moores had faced 151 balls and had hit 17 fours and one six in an excellent innings.Durham led by 63 runs. The last wicket had added 36 in seven overs. Salisbury finished with 4 for 74 and Carse 4 for 86.

Fletcher bowling from the Radcliffe Road End took a wicket with his third ball with left hander Lees leg before for a duck, 0 for 1. Borthwick nervously played and missed his first two balls as Fletcher bowled an outstanding first over. Hutton followed this up with a maiden. Jones was also struggling against The Bomber, Durham 1 for 1 off three overs at lunch. Borthwick with a single.

In the sixth over, Borthwick (1) edged Hutton to Duckett at second slip who took the catch low to his left , 5 for 2. In the 10th over, a peach of a ball from Hutton jagged in and removed Jones (5) off stump, 22 for three. Fletcher after a spell 8-2-17-1 before and after lunch was replaced by Lyndon James. Hutton (8-3-21-2) also completed his spell and Mullaney replaced him from the Pavilion End, Mullaney bowling faster than his normal pace with Moores standing back. Bedingham and Burnham were looking comfortable as Fletcher returned for the 27th over. The 50 partnership between Bedingham and Burnham came up in 29th over bowled by Fletcher. In the same over Bedingham hit a cover boundary to bring up his 50 off 79 balls. In the next over Burnham(18) was caught low down to his right by Moores off Mullaney, 78 for four.Durham got to tea on 95 for 4 off 33 overs with the outstanding Bedingham on 60 and Eckersley on 5. Notts had bowled well throughout the session.

Durham came out with attacking intent after tea as the light started to deteriorate and the floodlights were switched on. Mullaney (Pavilion End) and James (Radcliffe Road End) were bowling in tandem. Hutton replaced Mullaney in the 38th over. Bedingham hit James for successive off side fours with 14 runs coming off the over with the 50 partnership coming up in just nine overs. Fletcher immediately replaced James from the Radcliffe Road End. Hutton went off injured after 41.5 overs with Patterson-White completing his over, it was downhill all the way from this point for Notts. Bedingham reached his maiden 100 for Durham off 126 balls with a boundary through the covers. Bedingham hoisted Patterson-White for six over mid-wicket in the 50th over. James returned to replace Fletcher for the following over and off his first ball he was glanced to the fine leg boundary by Eckersley to bring up the 100 partnership in 21 overs between Bedingham and himself. After bowling four overs for 26 Patterson-White was replaced by Mullaney. Eckersley got to his 50 off 78 balls with a single off James.Patterson-White returned for James as Mullaney desperately tried to stem the runs. The 150 partnership came off 183 balls with Notts now setting defensive fields. Bedingham launched Patterson-White for a six into the middle tier of the Radcliffe Road. Bedingham got a career best 150 not out off 195 balls. The 200 partnership came off 226 balls with a leg side four for Eckersley off Patterson-White. Next over Mullaney for a six over long on by Bedingham. In order to speed up the over rate, Duckett came on for the 71st over replacing the beleaguered Patterson-White (10.1- 0-82-0) and bowled three overs of non descript right arm medium pace in combination with the skipper. Stumps were drawn at 1905 with Durham 332 for 4 off 76 overs. It had been a chastening final session for Notts and their supporters as the two Durham men took fulladvantage of a threadbare attack on a flat pitch and turned into a tough learning experience for youngsters James and Patterson-White. Durham will surely declare overnight and unleash Rushworth and co first thing tomorrow, it is time for the Notts top four to fire and withstand the new ball. A draw will be huge boost to team morale. MAG








Chris Rushworth speaking to ESPN


"We have spoken a lot about getting runs down the order because those extra 40-60 runs can make a big difference, especially on a wicket that is doing a bit. Getting from 260 to 330 is a massive difference in conditions like this, so we think we did a really good job batting.

"Speaking to a few of their lads, the wicket didn't really change much but I think we bowled a fuller length and got more reward from it. There was less wind, too, and the conditions suited, slightly warmer and with cloud cover all day, but overall I think we bowled better.

"We are still well in front in the game and we have played some good cricket up to now but it is important we start right on the money again in the morning." 




Day 2

DURHAM TAKE CONTROL

Notts had a poor day at Trent Bridge today allowing Durham to add 89 to their overnight score to finish on 330 all out; a brilliant recovery from 196 for seven. Notts were handicapped by an injury to lead bowler Jake Ball who left the field halfway through an over. When Notts batted, a combination of poor application and poor technique saw them collapse to 85 for six but they rallied to 165 for seven before play ended with 17.2 overs unused due to bad light. Matt Salisbury hardly a world beater grabbed the first three wickets and was backed up by two wickets apiece from the reliable Chris Rushworth and the pacy Brydon Carse. Notts batting performance could be best summed up by the fact that only Tom Moores, who was badly dropped on 8, with an undefeated 40 managed to get a higher score than Durham number eleven Chris Rushworth who scored 31 for visitors.

Play got under way 15 minutes late due to light rain. Ball and Hutton opened the bowling and in the second over of the morning a four for Ben Raine off Hutton brought up the 50 partnership for the eight wicket between him and Brydon Carse. In his second over Ball went lame and had to leave the field and Fletcher had to bowl the remaining three balls of the over. Off the first ball of the next over, Hutton got Carse leg before for 25, 250 for eight. In the 105th over, Fletcher had Salisbury caught at first slip by Hutton for 14, an innings including three fours, 271 for nine. Patterson-White replaced Hutton in the 108th over. Durham reached 282 for nine off 110 overs. A four for Rushworth off Fletcher brought up the 300 in the 113 overs. Raine reached his 50 off 100 balls with a single off Mullaney who had replaced Fletcher in the 114th over. Lyndon James replaced Patterson-White in the following over but Raine and Rushworth were making hay as the 50 partnership came up in 10 overs. Mullaney finally took the last wicket when Rushworth was leg before for 31, Durham 330 all out off 121.2 overs, the last wicket had added 59 runs..Ben Raine 59 not out off 121 balls with seven fours. Fletcher was the pick of the bowlers with 3 for 83. Slater safely negotiated a maiden over from Rushworth as lunch was taken.

Notts fell off a cliff after the interval. Off the fifth ball after lunch the leaden footed Slater edged Salisbury to keeper Poynter to depart for a nine ball duck, 1 for 1. Hameed never looked comfortable and it was no surprise when he was bowled by Salisbury losing his off bail to depart for a 28 ball 10, 26 for two in the 10th over. Clarke shuffling about his crease played an awful shot and departed first ball to Salisbury, another catch for Poynter. After taking three for 19 in a six-over spell Salisbury made way for Ben Raine. After an 8 over opening burst for 10 runs Rushworth was replaced by Carse from the Radcliffe Road End. Duckett batting recklessly throughout played an awful shot to be caught behind off Carse for a very unconvincing 24, 46 for four off 19 overs. Salisbury returned for the 22nd over. Rain stopped play at 1536 with Notts 66 for four off 23.3 overs with James on 19 and Mullaney on 11.

Play recommenced at 1620 with two overs lost and in the second over of the resumption, Mullaney (11) pushed at one from Rushworth and was caught at first slip by Bedingham, 66 for five. Moores was badly dropped on 8 at second slip by Borthwick off Matt Salisbury. Carse returned for the 31st over replacing Rushworth and with his second ball James (28) top edged a short ball and the ball went into orbit and Poynter raced from behind the stumps and took the catch mid-pitch, 85 for six. Patterson-White joined Moores and a flurry of boundaries saw Notts reach three figures in the 35th over. Moores hit three successive fours off Raine including consecutive edges through the slips. The 50 partnership for the seventh wicket came up with a four through the covers by Patterson-White off Raine, it had taken just nine overs. The wily Rushworth had Patterson-White caught behind for 26, 141 for seven in the 45th over. The seventh wicket had added 56 runs in 14 overs. The 150 was achieved via a leg side ball from Rushworth which went for four byes. The conditions were getting increasing murky and it was no surprise when bad light stopped play at 1811 with Notts 165 for seven off 48.4 overs with Moores on 40 and Hutton on 12. They had reached exactly half of Durham’s total. Play was called off 30 minutes later.

Durham had bowled well in the helpful overhead conditions, the pitch though remains a good one. James and Patterson-White both played promising cameos; persevering with local youth is definitely the desired course for Notts at present.

Today was a continuation of what we had seen in the two pre-season friendlies against county opposition. A flaky batting line-up which lacks depth and has too many cavalier batsmen, who have as yet, not showed sufficient technique against a moving ball. Last year we did get runs on flat tracks in August against what amounted in the most part to second eleven bowling attacks.

We have now been told that we have signed an overseas bowler who has been injured for a year rather than a steady top order batsman capable of seeing off the new ball. Time will tell whether this decision proves a wise one. MAG

Day 1

HONOURS EVEN

On a cold and blustery opening day at Trent Bridge, honours ended even with Durham after being inserted finishing on 241 for seven after 96 overs. Durham slipped to 5 for two; Jake Ball was excellent with the new ball removing Jones and Borthwick in the same over. Lees and Bedingham added 88 for the third wicket until the latter was removed by Fletcher off the last ball before lunch. Durham had the better of the middle session adding 86 for the loss of Lees who was run out following a direct hit from Joe Clarke. Notts fought back well after tea picking up three wickets in 12 overs. Carse and Raine, just like last year, proved difficult to remove and withstood the new ball adding an unbeaten 45 in 19.3 overs.

Notts won the toss and elected to bowl. Compton, Trego and new signing Dane Paterson were left out of the starting eleven which included Ball despite him not playing in any of pre-season practice games. There was no place for Paul Coughlin in the Durham team.

Ball (Radcliffe Road) and Hutton (Pavilion) opened the bowling. In the fifth over Ball got Michael Jones to edge to Hameed at third slip who took the catch at the second attempt diving towards first slip after juggling the ball, the right hander out for a 12 ball duck, 5 for one. Borthwick fell four balls later for a duck falling leg before to a well pitched up near unplayable delivery from Ball, 5 for two. After a spell of 4-2-7-0 Hutton was replaced by Fletcher. Hutton switched ends as Ball (6-4-10-2) took a break. Bedingham who joined Lees in the middle brought up the 50 partnership in 81 balls with an off drive off Hutton, as the Durham pair made relatively untroubled progress. Mullaney brought himself on in the 20th over from the Pavilion End replacing Fletcher. Three overs later Fletcher switched ends replacing Hutton. Bedingham reached his 50 off 76 balls with a leg side four off Mullaney. Just before lunch, Patterson-White came on and in the following over Fletcher removed Bedingham for 57 caught by Moores low to his right, the third wicket partnership had added 88 in 25 overs. Durham 93 for three off 30.4 overs with Lees on 33 at the break.

Ball and Hutton returned after lunch and initially kept the run rate down. Lees reached his 50 off 118 balls with an edged four off Ball in an over where he was hit for a further two boundaries by the former Yorkshire left hander. Patterson-White replaced Hutton for the 44th over. James came on the first time in the following over. In the 51st over, Lees was run out by Clarke at mid wicket with Burnham attempting a second run off James, Lees (58) failing to make his ground at the non strikers end as Clarke scored a direct hit, Durham 146 for four. After an impressive spell from James (7-1-17-0) with plenty of pace and bounce, Fletcher returned from the Radcliffe Road End and had couple of decent leg before shouts against Burnham and Eckersley which were turned down by umpire Ian Gould. Durham 179 for four off 64 overs with Burnham on 42 and Eckersley on 10.

In the first over after tea, Fletcher had Burnham (42) strangled down the leg side, excellently caught by the diving Moores, 180 for five. Poynter had a let off on 2 when he edged Fletcher between Moores and Hutton at first slip, the wicket keeper diving in front of Hutton. Mullaney picked up the sixth wicket when Eckersley on 19 slashed him to Hutton at first slip, 196 for six in the 76th over. James picked up a deserved wicket when had Poynter (7) edging to Moores who took the catch high to his right, 196 for seven. Ball and Hutton took the new ball with Durham on 205 for seven off 80 overs. The lights came on at 1730 in the 85th over. After eight overs without making a breakthrough Ball and Hutton were replaced by Fletcher and James. Patterson-White came on for the 94th over. Durham closed on 241 for seven off 96 overs with Carse on 21 and Raine on 20. Ball with 2-39 bowled with good rhythm all day and was well supported by Fletcher and impressive James generating plenty of pace and bounce. Hutton having enjoyed such an impressive pre-season had a quiet day on his very welcome to the Notts line up. Indeed it was very pleasing to see that five of the six bowlers used were products of Notts Youth System. Up yours Mike Atherton!

It was an attritional day of cricket played in awkward conditions with a brisk, bone-chilling south westerly wind. Notts will be hoping to remove for Durham for 275 or less tomorrow, although the visitors do bat very deep. It is very much a grafter’s pitch, the opening partnership between Slater and Hameed could be critical. Durham have the old warhorse Chris Rushworth in the line up, who always enjoys his trips to Trent Bridge. MAG

Steven's XI

Ben Slater

Haseeb Hameed

Ben Duckett

Joe Clarke

Lyndon James

Steven Mullaney *

Tom Moores x

Liam Patterson-White

Brett Hutton

Luke Fletcher

Jake Ball

Peter's XIV Squad

PM has opted to keep his cards close and announced a 14 man squad. No Zak Chappell, but Trego and Compton are in the XIV.

Ben Slater

Haseeb Hameed

Ben Duckett

Joe Clarke

Steven Mullaney *

Lyndon James

Tom Moores x

Liam Patterson-White

Brett Hutton

Dane Paterson

Jake Ball

Luke Fletcher

Peter Trego

Ben Compton

Preview:

As Trent Bridge market the women's Rockets, in the week of the launch of the re-vamped County Championship (this year sponsored by LV=), I thought I'd speculate as the starting eleven on Thursday.

Of course PM will announce a squad of thirteen or fourteen, when the squad is eventually released for real.


HBD XI

Ben Slater

Haseeb Hameed

Ben Duckett

Joe Clarke

Steven Mullaney *

Lyndon James

Tom Moores x

Liam Patterson-White

Brett Hutton

Dane Paterson

Zak Chappell


Add to those Peter's Ben Compton and Luke Fletcher. If Jake Ball is declared clean and uncontaminated fresh from quarantine then add him as well to make the fourteen.

To my eyes you have to pick 2 out of Hutton, Fletch, Trego and Dane P. Pick one or two quicks from Chappell, Ball, Barber and Pettman. Have either Joey Evison or Lyndon James if you have chosen only one quick.

Bowlers, obviously, will be rotated.

If you're going to have a spinner, and why wouldn't you, it's LPW but in his absence it's Carter.

Set in concrete, when fit, are Hameed, Duckett, Clarke, Moores junior and Captain Mull. Nash's departure has probably also cemented Slater at the top of the order as well.

Trego and Compton are cover for injuries to any of those 6. 

Stuart Broad will be accommodated when he is allowed to play. Disappointingly I don't see a role for Dane S, even if Moores is out for whatever reason, Duckett being the most likely deputy. 

Lord Budinger is surely for the ODC and T20 cover.

I for one, am looking forward to seeing what impact Dane Paterson can have; will he have a similar effect as Andre Adams for example?

Winless run

Notts clearly need to get the monkey off their backs, as soon into the season as possible, we really don't want to get into May with the three year anniversary looming in June, eight games to achieve something we haven't managed in the last 26 first class matches, before that anniversary on the 23rd June.

Fingers-crossed that this is the last time this particular table is used.

Date (last day)

Opposition

Venue

Toss

Result

Bat’

Bowl’

Total points

29 June 2018

WORC’SHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

23 July 2018

SURREY

TB

U

LI183R

1

2

3

22 Aug 2018

Hampshire

Rose Bowl

U

L270R

-

3

3

31 Aug 2018

Surrey

The Oval

U

LI125R

-

3

3

07 Sep 2018

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

5

2

12

13 Sep 2018

ESSEX

TB

W

L8W

-

3

3

26 Sep 2018

SOMERSET

TB

L

LI146R

-

2

2

08 Apr 2019

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

13 Apr 2019

SOMERSET

TB

U

LI14R

2

3

4*

16 May 2019

Essex

Chelmsford

W

L8W

-

3

3

23 May 2019

Hampshire

Newclose

U

L244R

1

3

4

06 June 2019

Warwickshire

Edgbaston

L

D

-

1

6

12 June 2019

HAMPSHIRE

WELBECK

U

D

-

-

5

20 June 2019

Kent

Tunbridge Wells

U

L285R

2

3

5

03 July 2019

ESSEX

TB

W

LI123R

1

1

2

09 July 2019

Somerset

Taunton

L

L132R

1

3

4

15 July 2019

SURREY

TB

L

L167R

-

3

3

21 Aug 2019

Yorkshire

Scarborough

U

L143R

-

3

3

12 Sep 2019

KENT

TB

L

L227R

-

3

3

19 Sep 2019

WARWICKSHIRE

TB

L

L8W

5

1

6

26 Sep 2019

Surrey

The Oval

L

D

-

2

7

04 Aug 2020

Derbyshire

TB (away**)

L

L3W

3

3

6

11 Aug 2020

YORKSHIRE

TB

L

L90R

4

3

7

18 Aug 2020

Lancashire

TB (away**)

L

D

5

3

16

25 Aug 2020

Leicestershire

Grace Road

W

D

3

3

14

09 Sep 2020

DURHAM

TB

L

D

5

3

16

* Deducted 1 point for slow over rate

Played 26 Won 0 Drawn 9 Lost 17 Batting 46 Bowling 65 Points 159

 

** Bob Willis Trophy scheduled away fixture played at Trent Bridge

Drawn matches in Bob Willis Trophy score 8 points




38 comments:

  1. 9 Headed Hydra6 April 2021 at 12:04

    Yes, agree with that. Possibly Fletch for Zak Chappell to offer more control ? Surely cautious Peter will opt for LJ ahead of Compo ? Younger player, better record for the 2s and also gives you an extra bowling option. Complete no brainier to me he should play in all the 4 day games this season. Like LPW he needs this level to improve not just merely knocking out runs for the 2s anymore. We've also been so chronic in red ball cricket over the last 3/4 years, there really is no pressure or expectation on the side anymore so surely an even easier option for the Head Coach to put 2 of the best of our Academy lads in the team and test them to see what they've got to offer. Think we will need Broad and Ball to fire in some early games for us to do anything in red ball again this season. However they say the Hit Man(Hutton) is a better bowler now he's back home and if the Great Dane(Paterson) can find his paws quickly we may surprise one or two. They say batters win you one day matches and bowlers win you the real stuff so we have to find a way of taking 20 wickets in a game

    ReplyDelete
  2. That eleven can win, I agree too.
    Re the previous comment, agree and it is strange how much more time is given to thinking about the batting line up when bowlers are the match winners as I am sure Tiger used to remind the Don.

    But then bowlers do need decent scores on the board to bowl with.

    I like the sort of things Peter is saying re young players, but we need a more supportive selection policy than in recent times to actually happen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, Lyndon James needs to be playing regular 4 day cricket now ,batting in the top 5, not at 8 or 9. I can think of at least half a dozen other counties that would pick him, so Notts beware, if they don't want to lose him at the end of the season.

    Moores favours,selecting a large number of left hand batsman,which I suspect is the main reason for pushing Compton.
    That is OK if the player is good enough.From what we have witnessed thus far, Compton has not inspired much confidence,in the matches against county opposition.

    Bowling wise, Chappel has not been able to hit the right line or length in the last 2 warm up matches, and doubts about Paterson's match fitness may be an issue.

    For me, I would also include Evison in the side, as he bowls at the stumps, and threatens the front pad, like Mr Rushworth will be doing for Durham..
    He will also strengthen our suspect batting line up.
    Probably Moores wouldn't have the foresight to pick him, especially if he selects James.

    Anyway, whatever 11 he selects, Hutton has to take the new ball.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Weather wise, have checked Met Office forecast and seems OK for the 4 days, if not scorching hot !
    Wind is changing from due North to West by South West, meaning the snow, which did not amount to much in these parts, is going !

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good luck to Notts ccc for the forthcoming season . We really do need an early red ball victory or two to install confidence in the side.
    On paper the side HBD has selected looks to be pretty well balanced . I would include Fletch in the starting eleven and omit Dane P . There must be questions about his match fitness over a four day game . He will be very eager to prove himself . We dont want him overstraining when not 100% fit and risk the possibility of breaking down . I agree about L James . He must play the 4 day games all season . What more can he do to prove hinself in the second eleven ? L P W also deserves a good run in the first team. Let's hope for a good keenly contested first 4 dayer that is rain and stoppage free. Thank goodness for the improved live streaming and the dependable MR NOTTS
    BRACEGIRDLE who will no doubt provide interesting ( if not critical) comments . Commentating over a 4 day match when not much is happening must be a difficult job!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Proving fitness-wise Fletch has sent down 35 overs in three games (3 innings); Dane P has bowled 31 overs in two games over three innings. What we don't know is what the after effects are...

      Delete
  6. Chances are that Patterson will play given Notts must be paying a pretty decent sum for his services.

    As for the rest I would look to have some real pace along with the ever dependable Hutton, Spinning wise I would choose LPW, Not only is he pretty accurate with the ball but he also offers a little bit more with the bat than Matt Carter.

    Whatever side is chosen let's just hope that Notts do justice to the undoubted talent that is contained within the squad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, we've got to win a game at some stage. Is it now 26 or 27 games since we last did do. You would think think is our best chance on the basis Durham have lost 2 of their batsmen, albeit re-signed Scott Borthwick and do not have the services of proven Aussie in English conditions Cameron Bancroft for this game. It would be tempting to throw the Great Dane in but would be a disaster if he then had an enforced lay off afterwards LPW for Carter is a no brainier. The ball will not spin in these cold conditions and LPW will always be in a completely different class as a batsman to Carter, a low order slogger of the ball. Hutton has been a bit of a disappointment up to now, albeit has had his injury problems. He looked a genuine all rounder when I first saw him for the Academy/2s about 6/7 years ago but this will now be another real chance for him now he's back sporting the green&gold. Does anyone remember the 3 day game in 1992 ? It was the year Durham joined the County Championship with their imported all star side of Botham, Larkins etc. A young blonde hair Notts seamer called David Pennet took the prize scalp of Aussie superstar Dean Jones in the match. Jones had his revenge when Durham followed on however when he made a century.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David pennet, he had a haircut and three quarters

      Delete
  8. Good job its a RED BALL game tomorrow at Trent Bridge . The WHITE BALL is awkward to follow in the snow .
    Joking aside its hard to imagine a big crowd for the first match even if spectators were allowed to watch .The maximum daytime temperatures forecast for the next 4 days are 12C- 9C- 8C- and 8C, with hardly any sunshine and a strong possibility of rain on Fri /Sat /Sun.
    Nothing new there then . Cricket in early April will always risk spectators wearing sheepskin coats

    ReplyDelete
  9. Glory, Glory Man. Utd......7 April 2021 at 17:05

    Yes, like most early season games, if things had been on a normal footing it would have sorted the men out from the boys(live streamers)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Really pleased Jake is available.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No Paterson - left out, injured, or 'not ready'? Lyndon James in is good, shame no Evison though

    ReplyDelete
  12. Don't think we were ever going to play Evison, LPW&LJ at the same time, however take your point as he looked an exceptional talent at such a young age when thrown in last season before he then was struck with injury. The Great Dane is still nursing his paws and bone(ios) it would seem. Hopefully when he returns we can Winalot more games and he's not feeling ruff for too much longer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I reckon he’ll only play away at grace road and derby because they let dogs in there.They’re not allowed in at Trent Bridge.

      Delete
  13. Wuff wuff!
    Dogs make excellent fielders . They chase all day long and never drop the ball.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The do. Did anyone see that April fool a few years back with Rob Key doing a piece about bulldogs being used as ball boys at T20 games.? It was a lighthearted piece and both rob and the dogs managed to keep a straight face.

      Delete
  14. How have we started the season with so many bowlers not being fully fit to bowl ? And with thiis we then had to bowl LPW for all those overs on day1 of a new season on April 8. No wonder why we struggle to win games of red ball cricket.

    ReplyDelete
  15. All I can say is that our coaching staff, need to start doing overtime on our imports, numbers 1 to 4 in the batting order.

    The people who eulogise about Clarke being a test match prospect, must be out of their tiny minds.I have seen better batting techniques by 50 year old amateurs on West Park in Long Eaton. Some one ought to tell the bloke that it is a sideways game.Not walking down the wicket face on to meet the bowler. He has been doing this for a number of seasons, but doesn't appear to learn from his mistakes.

    As for the other three, poor foot movement against the moving ball, which was evident in the warm up matches.

    These guys are basically, flat track bullies, and technically flawed against a dukes ball early season.

    So plenty of work ahead for players and coaches alike.

    The positives, our home grown players.

    Evison should play in the next match, as he looks to have a better batting technique than any of our top 4, from the little I have seen of him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In these uncertain times Mark, isn't it reassuring that there is something in life that can be relied on - Nottinghamshire's batting woes.

      Delete
  16. In front of the west wing in the lunch break ?

    ReplyDelete
  17. We keep hoping for Notts to improve in the vital 4 day games. But year in and out( for quite a whjle anyway) things stay the same and we are not making progress. White ball success is warmly applauded when it happens. But for ‘“real” cricket fans we want victories in the now bog standard County Games

    ReplyDelete
  18. To be on run of 27 games stretching nearly 3 years since the last 4 day victory plainly tells you one simple thing. You are just not a very good side,Dave Bracegirdle can prattle on all day about bonus points if it makes him feel better. I still think our inability to take 20 wickets on a consistent basis is the main reason although I fully accept Mark's point above about the top 4 batters. As Peter Moores told us at one of the last memebers forumns we signed young(ish) players from Division 2 when we signed the Fab 4 plus the bowler in Zak Chappell. Players with potential he said who they thought they could improve to replace the experience we had lost out of the side with Lumb, Taylor(x2), Read and then Hales and Gurney becoming white ball mercenaries. The white ball outfit is a as strong as any with all these imports. This is just as important to any club in today's age whether we like it or not. And it's clearly a record the TB hierarchy cling to to deflect from the red ball woes and one which, presumably, has saved the careers of the coaching staff I would suggest.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wish I could find something positive to say about Notts, They certainly do not make it easy!

    The one plus so far as to be Lyndon James, One of the few in Notts side to show a little bit of fight. As for the rest, The best that can be said is that at least those in the team that came through the Notts system showed a little more grit than their more expensive imported team mates.

    Speaking of imports I wonder if right now the Doc is frantically scouring the world for a batsmen capable of adding backbone to a side that desperately needs one.

    ReplyDelete
  20. With our alarming tendency to lose early wickets, would it be worth them considering using a nightwatchman opener, as Kent did many years ago with James Tredwell for a while when they had lots of middle order batsmen but not the necessary openers for red ball? Someone like Patterson-White?

    ReplyDelete
  21. RE Comments made by Ant Botha on Trent Bridge Youtube channel about the team now having "fight": I hope this is true but can I suggest that this has been sadly lacking ever since Chris Read retired IMHO.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Don't disagree,but let's put in a good performance all round today and see where that leaves us in the match.

    There is real ability in this team, real potential. But it is time some of this potential is realised.

    ReplyDelete
  23. There was more fight today, but 2 promising situations melted away, unlike the snow in Leeds !

    Good from Moores and Hutton, but feeling frustrated, not angry or critical though.

    ReplyDelete
  24. A familiar story for Notts in recent seasons,entering the final day of a 4 day match, with their backs against the wall .
    Unfortunate losing Ball and also Hutton, on a wicket,that now looks easy to bat on, although, I am sure Rushworth and Co, may have other ideas on that point, tomorrow.

    One question, that I would like to ask, is how did a batsman playing locally at Plumtree, who is approaching a double hundred, escape the notice of our beloved DOC, and end up at Durham instead of Trent Bridge. Technically, with a large forward stride,and on todays evidence, he looked in a different league to any of our top 4.

    Let us hope that our beleaguered batsman, prove me and others doubters wrong tomorrow, and put up a decent fight to earn a draw, as an early defeat will have an adverse effect on team morale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously someone in the position to sign him as a Kolpak, didn't rate him - it can't be the DoC because he's such a good judge of a player! ... so my brother Neil tells me.

      Delete
  25. Its not a good sign in early matches if we are relying on the weather to earn us some badly needed points!?
    Surely Durham will declare overnight and try and bowl us out before the promised rain arrives at circa 3 pm?
    Its been a bit of a slog for all the players because of the cold conditions and not being able to have hot showers after their exertions.
    Lets be honest - how many spectators would Notts have got at TB in the last 3 days taking into account the anticipated ground restrictions?
    Here is hoping we can salvage a draw!
    The 3 year wait for a first class victory goes on - and on !

    ReplyDelete
  26. with planning since last September and with the fortunate riches of the club being able to afford a DOC, Head Coach, 2 assistants to the Head Coach, plus the all S&C and support staff for the players plus a team analyst and top physio, how on earth have we arrived at Day4 of the first proper game with the majority of the bowlers all crocked to varying degrees. Surely it can't all be down to the perennial excuse always trotted out of "bad luck" ? Regarding the last comment, I would have thought the vast majority of the members who would normally attend the games on a typical English April still would have gone at some point over the 4 days. Don't see how restricted capacity of approximately 4,000 would affect these numbers greatly. The people who would rather watch the action on the live stream wouldn't have gone anyway so I can't see that having much of an effect on the attendances over the 4 days

    ReplyDelete
  27. Is there a rule as to how quickly groundsmen need to get covers on? I felt our home groundsmen were a bit fast in bringing that cover on, given we are playing for a draw. If they could take even 3 or 4 more minutes, the pitch might have got a good bit wetter, and we could have secured the draw.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's much less bovver with a hover.

      Delete
  28. We fought out for a draw, and that is good
    A maiden half century for James

    ReplyDelete
  29. At the end of the day Notts showed some fight and secured a draw . Yesterday at lunchtime Notts were three wickets down and looked odds on to be bowled out sometime after tea.
    Very well done to James and Mullaney for knuckling down to secure some badly needed points. Notts bowling situation is a bit worrying . I wonder if the cold playing conditions played a part in the fast bowlers problems? Same for both sides
    I suppose?
    Anyway at least there were some positives to be had from a cracking game of 4 day cricket!

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts...