08 October, 2022

The Strauss Lite - 12 Championship Games?

 



ECB forced to water down plans to cut County Championship fixture list

Talks are advanced on a new proposal to reduce the Championship from 14 to 12 games – two more than originally suggested

ByNick Hoult


The England and Wales Cricket Board has been forced into a major climbdown over its plans to cut its premier domestic competition to 10 games and now looks likely to accept a compromise.

Talks are advanced on a new proposal to reduce the Championship from 14 to 12 games – two more than the original suggestion made in the high-performance review led by Sir Andrew Strauss.

Three separate divisions of six will also be on the table with two going up and two down between divisions two and three and one up, one down between divisions two and one.

A play-off between the bottom two teams in division one will determine which county is relegated, while a play-off between the top two in division two will decide who goes up to the top flight.

The decision to cut the Blast from 14 to 10 games is also likely to be reviewed, although there is more work to be done on how this will look. One proposal is to go with 12 games in the belief the higher intensity and better scheduling of Blast matches will work to the benefit of the counties in the long run.

One of the red lines for the ECB was a top division of six with just one team relegated to preserve a best versus best scenario and this will stay. But the original proposal from the review was to split the other 12 teams into two conferences of six, with only one promotion place. Counties feared under such a scenario they could be marooned outside the top flight for years.

It is understood that by making it three separate divisions with more fluidity, county chairs are willing to support a reduction in the number of matches.

For the counties reaching the play-offs they would only lose one four-day game a year. For the others it will be two. “These are the compromises we can move towards,” said one county source.

A ballot is still scheduled to take place on October 20 with a majority vote of 12 required for any change to go through.

Some counties will still resist changes under pressure from their members who prefer four-day cricket. There were concerns that reducing the Blast to 10 games would hit revenue but playing 12, for example, would ease some of those fears.

The problem with 12 Championship matches in a division of six teams is that it makes the fixture list unequal. Counties will have to play one opponent three times but that could be turned into a money spinner if it enables more local derbies, which also cut costs on expenses. There is an acceptance that any proposal will not be perfect.

Opposition to the Strauss review was immediate and has stiffened in recent weeks. Last week the ECB believed it had around six or seven counties in favour after a meeting with county chairs, well short of the 12 required. With some Test grounds, who are likely to vote in favour of a reduction, agreeing to a binding vote of their membership, the chances of the ECB proposals going through were minimal.

Now county chairs will hope that by forcing the ECB to compromise on 10 games it will be enough to quell member revolt, especially as there is widespread acceptance that the current schedule is unworkable, and was heavily criticised before the introduction of the Hundred made matters worse.

Last week Sir Geoffrey Boycott joined the chorus of opposition, writing for Telegraph Sport that the proposals would be the “death of county cricket”.

16 comments:

  1. Firstly, where has this recent phrase “widely accepted the current system isn’t working” suddenly sprung up from ? The County system has been like a mis-mash of fixture congestion for years and despite all the moaning and groaning still seems to have worked each season. If you’re coining in the Hundred loot as a player you’re not playing against Durham at Grantham as well so you’re not suddenly being asked to play more games than you have been before the Hundred.
    I think the phrase would be “hollow victory”. It’s easy to forget a round of championship games was also taken off the schedule I believe 5 years ago. It used to be 16 not the current 14.
    Plus, they won’t stop here assuming they can obtain the 12 majority vote needed. It’s bound to raise its ugly head again in a couple of years to try to reduce it further again to their desired utopia of 10 games.
    If players like Stokes, Bairstow,Buttler etc are all complaining of ‘mental exhaustion’ due to the schedule then stop playing so much franchise cricket and be more selective. You don’t play much County cricket these days anyway. Go back to the 70s and 80s and have loads more time off if you prefer the massive downside is you won’t all be millionaires from the game when you retire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Point 1/ A school leaver these days would expect to have somewhere between 5 and 10 different careers during their working life. Why are men playing cricket looking to rake -in some much cash so that they don't have to work ever again once they retire from cricket? They're not super special human beings really. Point 2/ Lots people stopped being members when the championship was cut to 14 games, that was their line in the sand. They have already been lost. Point 3/ Why can't the ECB blame the Hundred for this mess, those responsible have gone now, leaving this trail of devastation. Time to put your big boy pants on ECB. The Hundred is the problem. Point 4/ As contracts have been signed for the Hundred until 2028, get it played in FebruaryMarch/April overseas, record it and show repeats in August. No one would notice!

      Delete
    2. “Big boy pants “ lol but all that you have said is true

      Delete
  2. 14 Championship Games Minimum

    ReplyDelete
  3. A game changer for me if we do go to 12. Not sure I can turn my back on the game, but membership ?
    14 matches with better scheduling is doable, both for Championship and Blast.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 75 NOT OUT .
    How I would love to be a fly on the wall at ECB headquarters when the Strauss proposals are discussed and Red Lines thrashed out.If the ECB cannot get the " compromise" 12 four dayers passed by the 18 Counties than what will be the next move ? With hindsight it's now obvious to most of us that the 100 Comp has virtually ruined the whole cricket season structure for many in the game .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And as Lisa Pursehouse told Notts members back in 2019, The Hundred is not for you. The Hundred has been a great boon to women's cricket. This however, comes at the expense of the whole of the men's game in this country, which is in the process of ripping itself apart. Is the Hundred such a good deal? Discuss...

      Delete
    2. The women’s game can easily keep growing and be supported along side the t20 game. More so if you think about it .wait till next summer and people are feeling the pinch , Chuck in a poor season weather wise , will the audience who it is for stump up ( get it ) their money in advance? Foxy

      Delete
  5. 75 NOTOUT
    I dont wish to “ insult” anyone but I dont the 100 Ball fans are “ proper “ cricket fans . How many if them ever attend a four day game or would even worry if the 4 day just disappeared? Its good that the 100 appears to be attracting a pretty young audience . But will that translate to bums on seats for the more serious stuff later on ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Devil's AdvocaatSunday, 09 October, 2022

      Would you be concerned if the Hundred disappeared, with the associated loss of the pretty, young audience?

      Delete
  6. Sorry missed a word out .
    Should read
    “ I dont think “etc

    ReplyDelete
  7. In my opinion they could have ‘jazzed’ up the existing Blast T20 to attract a younger, new audience into the game. It didn’t need a completely new franchise of 100 balls which is just complete gibberish.The live games on terrestrial tv all appear to be on BBC2 now anyway so the ludicrous notion that 20 over a side cricket couldn’t fit into the BBC’s programme scheduling now appears to be a complete nonsense. Why did the ECB not target schools etc with the existing competition they already had. It’s easy for the game’s administrators to say it just wouldn’t have worked, but why wouldn’t it if they have marketed it along similar lines to the Hundred and been prepared to plough the same sort of money in and, of course, schedule it properly. How many of the ‘new audience’ are really bothered whether Baz(Alex Hales) is launching it into the stands for Notts Outlaws or Trent Rockets or whether Liam Livingstone is doing similar for his native Lancashire Lightning or Birmingham Phoenix ? I suspect very few indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Devil's AdvocaatSunday, 09 October, 2022

      The pretty, young new audience find it difficult to have any affiliation with the concept of counties, being more at ease with random regional areas (Northern and Southern) mixed with big cities (London, Birmingham and Manchester) or with added nonsense names like Oval or Trent. What's the other one, oh yes, Welsh. See it's much easier to associate with a river that crosses boroughs, counties and even regions. The Rockets are big in Stoke and on Biddulph Moor I've heard.

      Delete
    2. Devil's AdvocaatSunday, 09 October, 2022

      No I haven't really

      Delete
  8. When the 100 Ball proposals were first rushed through I dont think any of us knew the true final ramifications and consequences. It was sold as a “saviour” of the game . Whereas many now think it is destroying it by vitually making the previous type of season unworkable.
    KNOWING WHAT WE KNOW NOW - WOULD THE 100 BALL PLANS BE VOTED THROUGH AGAIN ?
    75 NOT OUT

    ReplyDelete
  9. Blame the counties. Tennant and Pursehouse voting with their hands out. £1.3 M x 4 years is a weighty argument. Allowing Tom Harrison to extend the Hunded without consultation with the Counties was weak; and in another world, heads would have been on the block for letting Harrison get away with it, both at the ECB and within the 18 counties. The Hundred is now fuelled by the praising propaganda of the TV media that broadcast it,but look past the propaganda and the dissenters are growing in number and are becoming more vocal, having seen and experienced the negative impact for two years.

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts...