Tuesday 11 August 2020

Yorkshire BWT at Trent Bridge - Loss REPORT


Day 4

ANOTHER TUESDAY, ANOTHER NOTTS DEFEAT

Groundhog Day at Trent Bridge

Lack of application and a collective lack of moral fibre were once again very much in evidence at Trent Bridge as Notts chasing a very gettable 188 to beat Yorkshire went from 46 for two just before lunch to being bowled out for 97 all out before 3 o clock as Yorkshire triumphed by 90 runs. The pathetic nature of the collapse was all too predictable.

 

Notts managed to polish off the Yorkshire innings in 45 minutes this morning on a slow pitch where application was the name of the game. Tattersall once again showed it in bucket loads batting for 180 balls which was one more ball than Notts faced in their entire second innings capitulation. Nash was unlucky to be adjudged leg before to ball going way down the leg side, Hameed played a terrible shot to be strangled out. Then the key play, Duckett (19) who top scored with 19 was caught in the gully by a ball from Olivier on the stroke of lunch. This appeared to completely knock the stuffing out of team. What followed was a procession of embarrassing dismissals as Notts gave up the ghost, the Yorkshire bowlers were given freebies. The team clearly has a massive mental block in four-day cricket which has dragged on far too long. Ball getting injured did not help, but unfortunately the injury was predictable given his workload. Now it appears the team has more coaches than bowlers! The contributions of Duckett and Clarke remain negligible and as yet Trego has made no impact. There still appears to a lack of team togetherness in pressure situations.

 

Carter (Radcliffe Road End) and Chappell (Pavilion End) opened the bowling. In the fourth over of the morning, Olivier (8) edged Chappell to Moores who took the catch diving to his right, 262 for 8. In the 105th over, a leg side swipe from Dominic Leech off Carter saw him top edge the ball and Mullaney took an easy catch, 267 for nine. Tattersall got to his 50 with a four through mid wicket off Chappell. Carter picked up his fourth wicket when Tattersall  (53 off 180 balls with 5 fours) attempting to reverse sweep top edged to Mullaney who equalled the club record of 7 catches in the match for a fielder. Yorkshire were 278 all out off 108.2 overs with Chappell 4 for 59 and Carter 4 for 76, they have both bowled well.

 

Notts required 188 off a minimum of 77 overs. Olivier (Pavilion End) and Leech (Radcliffe Road End) constituted the opening attack. Nash (11) was very unlucky to adjudged leg before to Olivier, the ball going down leg side, 16 for one. Hameed played a terrible shot strangled down the leg side, caught Bairstow bowled Leech for 1, 16 for two off six overs. Clarke joined Duckett and the scoring rate started to go up, Patterson replaced Leech from the Radcliffe Road End for the 10th over. There was a long stoppage as Clarke was hit on the helmet from a short ball from Olivier then on the stroke of the lunch a ball from Olivier popped up and Duckett (19) edged to Malan in the gully. Notts 46 for 3 at the interval with Clarke 7 not out.

 

After lunch it was all too familiar Fred Karno time, Clarke (18) hit three fours but then was caught and bowled low down by Olivier who picked up his third wicket, 61 for four. A very soft dismissal. A leaden footed Mullaney (5) was caught behind off Patterson, 61 for 5. Olivier’s 10 over spell from the Pavilion End ended with figures 3 for 29, he did not bowl again. Thompson came on from the Pavilion End and Moores (8) had his stumps demolished as the young all rounder having fine game picked up a wicket with his third ball, 75 for 6. Shutt picked up his maiden first-class victim as Trego was plumb leg before for 7 to his fourth delivery of the innings, 82 for seven. Chappell (0) did not last long caught at mid wicket by Shutt off Thompson,  a dreadful shot, Chappell picking out the only fielder on the leg side, 89 for eight. Carter was the next on the conveyor belt lbw Thompson for seven, 97 for nine. Four balls later the misery ended when Patel was caught at mid wicket by Malan off Shutt who picked up his second wicket. Thompson statistically having the best figures of 5-1-6-3. It was all too easy for them, they did not really have to work hard for their wickets, it was more a case of them being presented on a plate. Yet another complete unacceptable and embarrassing performance.

 

It should not end there of course it is now over to our ELECTED committee for what happens next. The dire run has gone on far too long and if you ask any long standing county member from any other county they ALL KNOW where the major problems are. So if any of the 12 elected members are reading this, please remember how you became a member of the committee in the first place. Answer: The members voted for you to represent our views and best interests. So please now act !!!!! As Henderson said “Heads should roll!’ TWENTY-THREE and counting.  If you still unsure I suggest you read the various forums and social media posts. Yes there are a lot of vile and totally uncalled comments out there, but surely not everyone is wrong. However from a Notts perspective Nero, unfortunately, is still fiddling!


Date (last day)

Opposition

Venue

Toss

Result

Bat’

Bowl’

Total points

29 June 2018

WORC’SHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

23 July 2018

SURREY

TB

U

LI183R

1

2

3

22 Aug 2018

Hampshire

Rose Bowl

U

L270R

-

3

3

31 Aug 2018

Surrey

The Oval

U

LI125R

-

3

3

07 Sep 2018

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

5

2

12

13 Sep 2018

ESSEX

TB

W

L8W

-

3

3

26 Sep 2018

SOMERSET

TB

L

LI146R

-

2

2

08 Apr 2019

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

13 Apr 2019

SOMERSET

TB

U

LI14R

2

3

4*

16 May 2019

Essex

Chelmsford

W

L8W

-

3

3

23 May 2019

Hampshire

Newclose

U

L244R

1

3

4

06 June 2019

Warwickshire

Edgbaston

L

D

-

1

6

12 June 2019

HAMPSHIRE

WELBECK

U

D

-

-

5

20 June 2019

Kent

Tunbridge Wells

U

L285R

2

3

5

03 July 2019

ESSEX

TB

W

LI123R

1

1

2

09 July 2019

Somerset

Taunton

L

L132R

1

3

4

15 July 2019

SURREY

TB

L

L167R

-

3

3

21 Aug 2019

Yorkshire

Scarborough

U

L143R

-

3

3

12 Sep 2019

KENT

TB

L

L227R

-

3

3

19 Sep 2019

WARWICKSHIRE

TB

L

L8W

5

1

6

26 Sep 2019

Surrey

The Oval

L

D

-

2

7

04 Aug 2020

Derbyshire

TB (away**)

L

L3W

3

3

6

11 Aug 2020

YORKSHIRE

TB

L

L90R

4

3

7



Day 3
OBDURATE TYKES BAT ALL DAY

AS BALL PULLS UP AFTER 3 OVERS

Yorkshire had the better of the third day of this fixture on a deteriorating pitch which seems to be losing pace. They closed on 259 for 7, a lead of 168 runs. Notts were seriously handicapped when Jake Ball left the field with a side strain after bowling only three overs first thing, his very heavy workload over the past week seemingly catching up with him. 


Notts had got off to a dream start as Tom Kohler-Cadmore departed for a golden duck to Chappell’s first ball. Lyth and Bairstow  were circumspect at first and struggled to time the ball on a pitch which appears difficult for new batsmen but offers easier runs for those who play themselves in. It took Notts until the 45th over to take another wicket as the experienced pair added 131 for the second wicket. Three wickets then fell in 18 balls. Lyth (50 off 124 balls – 6x4) was caught at slip off Patel, there was some doubt as to whether it came directly off his boot. Then came the champagne moment of the day as Bairstow was brilliantly held by Hameed at short leg for 75 (140 balls with 14 fours)  off Carter. The same combination then dismissed Malan for one. Brook counterattacked and added 50 in 17 overs with the obdurate Tattersall. In the first over tea, Brook fell to slip catch off Patel. With Ball crocked, Mullaney perhaps let Carter and Patel bowl together for too long as Tattersall and Patterson added 54 valuable runs in 30 overs. Late on, Chappell took two wickets with the second new ball, to keep the door ajar for Notts,  as Thompson and Patterson fell to edges. Tattersall, a thorn in Notts side once more, has so far batted for 155 balls for his 41. With the ball only eight overs old, Notts will have to remove the last three Tyke batsmen quickly tomorrow to stand a chance.

 

Jake Ball’s (Radcliffe Road End) first ball was leg glanced to the boundary by Adam Lyth. Chappell's first ball saw Kohler-Cadmore depart for a golden duck gliding the ball straight to Matt Carter at second slip, 4 for one. A short ball from Chappell was pulled to square leg by new batsman Johnny Bairstow. Jake Ball went off injured with a side strain after he had bowled three overs, he never returned. Peter Trego replaced him for two overs and then switched ends. Matt Carter came on at the Radcliffe Road End. Off the last ball of his first over, Bairstow edged a ball between keeper Moores and slip Mullaney. The Yorkshire 50 came up in the 16th over. Lyth and Bairstow were making steady progress and with score on 63 for 1 after 23 overs,  Mullaney came on. With lunch approaching, Patel came on from the Pavilion End to bowl the last over before the interval. Yorkshire, at lunch, 82 for one after 30 overs with Lyth on 33 and Bairstow on 44.

 

The first three overs after lunch were bowled by three different bowlers Carter, Chappell and Patel. Ten minutes after lunch Yorkshire took the lead as Bairstow got to his 50 off 100 balls. A cut four from Bairstow off Chappell brought up the 100 partnership off 204 balls. Nash became the third spinner used from the Radcliffe Road End in 25 minutes when he bowled  the 37th over, he was to bowl another four during two afternoon spells. Patel then switched ends as scoring rate started to increase. Lyth got to his 50 off 117 balls with two off Nash. In the 44th over, Lyth (50) edged Patel to Mullaney at slip, 135 for two. Replays were inconclusive to whether it came off his boot. In the next over  Bairstow (75) was very well caught one handed to his right at short leg by Hameed off Carter, 135 for three. Malan (1) lasted 11 deliveries caught bat pad by Hameed off Patel, 136 for four. Brook twice danced down the pitch and deposited Carter for straight fours. He did the same to Patel this time clearing the ropes. With the partnership gathering pace, Nash returned for the 61st over. Yorkshire were 186 for 4 off 63 overs with Brook on 30 and Tattersall on 15, the two had added 50 in 98 balls.

 

Two balls after tea,  Patel got a ball to pop up and it found the edge of Harry Brook's bat and Mullaney took an easy catch running from slip, 186 for 5. Brook out for 30 off 48 balls (2x4, 1x6). A leg side four by Jordan Thompson  off Carter brought up the 200 off 75 overs. Things started to drift a bit as spin twins Patel and Carter started to tire after bowling so long in the heat. The captain brought himself on for the 83rd over to replace Patel. The new ball was taken with Yorkshire 227 for five off 90 overs. The new cherry was taken by Carter and Chappell. With the 4th over with the new ball Thompson (33) was well held to his right at second slip by Carter off Chappell, 240 for 6. In an eventual over Chappell bowled a beamer which was called a no ball, then Patterson hit him for four through third man. Chappell then got Patterson to edge to Moores, 246 for seven. Trego replaced Carter and Tattersall hit him for a boundary through mid wicket.  Yorkshire closed on 259 for seven off 98 overs with Tattersall 41 not out and Olivier 8 not out. Chappell once again a bit Bertie Bassett finished with 3-49 off his 12 overs. Carter and Patel had combined figures of 61-17-130-4.

 

Notts had bowled well in the heat and apart from one chance missed as a ball was edged between keeper and slip off Carter’s first over had held all their catches. They are still in this game but will have to withstand the new ball when Yorkshire eventually bowl tomorrow. They will also be hoping that Shutt repeats his nervous first innings show as the wicket will be giving him increased assistance. MAG








Day 2
MOORES TON RAISES NOTTS HOPES OF A W** (don't say it you might jinx it)

A brilliant day for Notts being bowled out for 355 and taking a lead of 91 runs on first innings. Tom Moores after his annus horribilis of 2019 came good with a magnificent career best 106 (off 140 balls, 12x4, 3x6); sharing a last wicket stand of 61 in 8 manic overs with Matt Carter which meant Notts garnered two unexpected bonus batting points. Moores had also previously only hit one ton, an innings of 103 at Taunton two summers ago, but after starting slowly accelerated, his first 50 taking 99 balls and speeding from 50 to 100 in 38 balls, he looks a far better batsman playing his natural aggressive style. Yorkshire captain Steven Patterson spreading his field after the fall of ninth wicket and delaying taking the new ball for three overs also aided matters. There were useful contributions from Joe Clarke who made 35 and was looking in good form before he was run out by smart piece of fielding from Jordan Thompson after Mullaney set off for an optimistic single. The captain himself made 50, Peter Trego 39 and Patel batting once again at eight made 38, adding 99 in 27 overs for the seventh wicket with Moores. Notts then lost three quick wickets for eight runs to lose some initiative but then came the crucial last wicket stand which put the game into Notts favour. The pitch did not deteriorate as much as expected today although Yorkshire did not offer much of a spin threat with young Jack Shutt (8-0-49-0) disappointing and captain Patterson having to turn to the occasional spin of Lyth (1-52) and Malan (2-24).

On a cloudy morning Notts resumed their innings. Steven Patterson completed his over and then Olivier was hit for two boundaries in his first over by Hameed. Only two more boundaries followed in the next half hour as Oliver and Patterson kept a tight rein on the proceedings. Duckett though kept away from Olivier and once the South  African bowled at the left hander it took him four balls to remove him caught at second slip by Adam Lyth for 4, 30 for two.  Leech and Thompson replaced Olivier and Patterson after the openers had bowled unchanged for 20 overs. Leech picked up his maiden first-class wicket in his second over as Hameed edged to Lyth at second slip, 55 for three.  Hameed 21 off 68 balls (4x4). Mullaney joined Clarke and they added exactly 50 before lunch. Mullaney got off the mark with a four through the covers off Leech. The Middlesbrough youngster was getting good the ball to swing in the cloudy conditions and bowled a five over spell costing 24 runs. Clarke survived a close run attempt when he was on 18. Harry Brook replaced him with his slow medium dobbers. Olivier came on for economical Thompson (5-4-5-0) and Clarke played the shot of the morning, straight driving him for four. Mullaney then pulled the South African for six into The Fridge. In complete contrast to yesterday no spin was seen before lunch as Notts got through to interval on 105 for 3 off 34 overs with Clarke on 32 and Mullaney on 25.

After lunch Patterson returned from the Pavilion End and off spinner Jack Shutt had his first bowl of the match. Mullaney smashing a full toss from the nervous 23 year old over his head for four, seven off the over. Some poor cricket from Notts saw Mullaney going for a suicidal single on the off side, the highly mobile Thompson running out Clarke for 35 off 61 balls (5x4), the former Worcester man well short of his ground. Clarke having batted well had been sold short by his skipper, 115 for four. Shutt was bowling too many four balls and Mullaney and Trego were cashing in. Thompson replaced the economical Patterson and fellow off spinner Lyth came on for Shutt. Mullaney hit off side and leg side fours off his first over. Mullaney got to his 50 off 79 balls with a boundary down to third man off Thompson. Mullaney (50 of 85 balls, 8x4,1x6) fell next over plumb leg before missing an attempted sweep shot to Lyth, 163 for five. Peter Trego took ten off an over from Thompson including two offside boundaries. The returning Olivier got Trego caught in the gully for 39 (66 balls – 5x4) by Harry Brook, 187 for six. Samit Patel got Notts to 200 with a single off Olivier. Jack Shutt came on just before tea from Pavilion End going for 11 including five wides down the leg side. Patel also survived a confident appeal for caught behind dismissal off the young off spinner. Notts got to tea on 231 for 6 off 66 overs with Patel on 23 and Moores on 19.

After tea, with the sun now consistently shining, a four from Moores off Dominic Leech brought up the 50 partnership. The 250 came up in the 74th over. A reverse sweep for six by Moores off Lyth saw Notts take the lead batting second for the first time in a first-class match since New Road in April 2018. Moores and Patel were milking the Tykes bowling. Dawid Malan came on bowling leg spinners for the 82nd over. Moores got to a half ton off 99 balls with a single off Thompson. Malan broke through with his eleventh ball as Patel gloved a delivery into Brook's hands at short leg. The 7th wicket partnership had added 99 runs. Notts 286 for seven, Patel had made 38 off 78 balls with four boundaries. Zak Chappell (1) did not last long, being caught behind off Thomson as Bairstow took his first catch of the innings, 293 for 8. Ball got a golden duck edging Malan to Lyth at first slip, 294 for 9. Off the penultimate ball of the 88th over a single for Moores off Malan saw Notts to their third batting point.  Moores slogged a four off Olivier and then took a single. Moores then swept Malan for four. The increasingly confident Moores then reverse swept Malan for six into The Fridge. Moores then pulled Olivier for six and hit another leg side four and then a four through backward point; smoke was coming out the scoreboard! The new ball was taken with Notts 330 for 9 off 93 overs. Carter squirted a four through third man off Patterson and then hit a six over widish long on. A four through point off Olivier saw Moores to a memorable ton and then a hooked four next ball meant a fourth batting point for Notts. Carter hit an offside four of the last ball of an over costing 15 runs. 

With three overs remaining Moores (106) lost his leg stump to Yorkshire’s best bowler Patterson. Notts 355 all out off 95.1 overs. Carter with a valuable 15 not out. Yorkshire had no time to bat. With a lead of 91 runs on the board, Jake Ball in fine form and a spin option clearly superior to the visitors, Notts now have an achievable chance to remove that gigantic monkey off their backs. Can they do it? MAG










Of course, nothing really matters as the competition is sinking into the realms of Disney credibility with week-long loans and venue switches at the drop of a hat. It's something like a SEC+, but at least it is cricket and with it we can enjoy the drama of the twists and turns of fortune and all have a good moan when when our team are made to look foolish, inept or incompetent. 






Day 1

NASH NOTTS HERO WITH THE BALL, BUT THOMPSON SMASHES THE ADVANTAGE TO YORKSHIRE 

A superb 98 in only his fourth first-class match by left-hander Jordan Thompson put Yorkshire in a dominant position at the end of the first day at sun baked Trent Bridge today. Badly dropped by Captain Steven Mullaney on 32 off Samit Patel he really cashed in. Notts had bowled well early doors reducing Yorkshire 44 for four with Zak Chappell picking up his first two wickets for Notts (Bairstow and Malan). Harry Brook (62) and Tattersall (31) added 92 runs for the fifth wicket and then Thompson came in. The left hander had useful partnerships with Brook (40 – sixth wicket), Patterson 42 – seventh wicket) and 32 for the last wicket with debutant Dominic Leech (0 not out).  Yorkshire were 264 all out and Notts then lost Chris Nash off the last ball of the day and closed on 13 for one.

Yorkshire won a crucial toss and elected to bat on the same pitch as used for the Derbyshire game. With the pitch expected to take turn Matt Carter came into the team along with Zak Chappell. Out of the team went Tom Barber and the injured Joey Evison. Yorkshire welcomed back Johnny Bairstow and Duanne Olivier into the eleven. 

Off the third ball of the third over Adam Lyth played a round a straight one and was leg before to Jake Ball (Radcliffe Road End) for four, six for one. In the 12th over a short ball for Chappell sat up to Bairstow (5) who smashed it straight to Patel at point, 23 for two. His first wicket for Notts in his seventh match. Ball after a good spell of 6-3-9-1 was replaced by Mullaney. In his next over Chappell got one to leave Malan (9) who feathered it to Moores behind the stumps, 33 for three. Matt Carter came on for Chappell (7-3-19-2) for the 16th over. In Carter's third over an attempted sweep from Kohler-Cadmore (21) ballooned up to Mullaney who took a simple catch at slip, 44 for four. Ball came back for the 22nd over and after a four over spell Carter was replaced by Patel. Carter switched ends and for the second time in the morning a delivery from Carter beat both the batsman and keeper Moores to get for four byes. At lunch, Yorkshire 67 for 4 off 29 overs Brook 5 not out and Tattersall 13 not out. Notts had won the session.

Chappell returned straight after lunch from the Pavilion End and Harry Brook hit him for two boundaries off the first three balls and then finished off the over with a widish ball then went for the third lot of four byes of the day. Another poor over from Chappell bowling short and wide saw another three boundaries for the Tykes. The 100 came up in the 34th over via a no ball from Chappell. After an indifferent three over spell for 26, Chappell was replaced by Ball. The Welbeck Wizard bowled five overs for 16 and then Patel returned for the 46th over. With the fifth wicket stand worth 92, Jonathan Tattersall (31) went for a sweep of Patel as the slow left-armer rapped him on the pad; Grim Tim raised the finger, 136 for 5. In Patel's next over, Harry Brook got a single to reach his 50 off 88 balls. Brook hoisted Patel for six over long on into the vacant Pavilion seats. Just before tea, Nash was introduced for Carter and he struck with his first ball! Getting one to turn he removed Brook's off stump, 176 for six. The right hander had scored 62 off 111 balls (9x4,1x6). Yorkshire 177 for 6 off 63 overs at tea, Jordan Thompson 26 not out and Steven Patterson 1 not out. Yorksgire had lost two wickets for 110 runs in the middle session.

In the first over after tea,  Thompson on 32 was badly dropped by Mullaney at first slip off Patel. A very hard drive from Thompson was put down by bowler Patel on 37, a technical chance nothing more. Zak Chappell returned for the 70th over and two streaky fours through the vacant third slip position saw Thompson to his maiden first class 50 off 70 balls. Notts needed a breakthrough and Nash (11) provided it as Patterson was caught at first slip by Mullaney off the off spinner, 218 for 7. After 6 overs where he picked up 2 for 20 Nash was replaced by Carter from the Radcliffe Road End. Patel picked up his second wicket in the 76th over when he had Olivier  was leg before for 5, 231 for eight. Jack Shutt fell for a five ball duck leg before to Carter, 232 for nine. Thompson then hit Patel for two sixes into The Fridge and creamed him for a four through the covers and then a four through slip, 20 off the over. Ball replaced Patel but was pulled for two leg side sixes by Thompson. Nash then replaced Ball and got left hander Thompson caught at first slip by Mullaney for 98 off 103 balls (11x4,4x6). Yorkshire 264 all out off 81.2 overs, Nash with Notts best figures of three for 20. This was his first bowl since his horrendous shoulder injury in the T20 match versus Warwickshire in early July 2018. Ball (14-5-41-1) bowled well once more. Chappell (13-3-64-2) after his best spell for Notts early doors lost his way after lunch (6-0-45-0) losing both his line and direction. Carter proved economical with 27-8-44-2. Patel, unlucky to have Thompson grassed finished with 17-3-72-2 and Trego after taking the new ball against Derbyshire, never bowled a ball in anger today.

Olivier bowled the first over from the Pavilion End and Nash creamed his second ball through the covers for four. Nash repeated the shot in the South African's next over. However in the last over for the day Nash was bowled by the accurate Patterson for 8. Notts 13 for one off 7.3 overs with Hameed 4 not out. With the pitch expected to deteriorate later on, Notts will need to obtain a substantial lead to have a realistic chance of a victory. MAG






Preview: 


Notts last beat Yorkshire in a first class game in 2008, so an improbable win in this fixture would be long over due for two reasons, as the winless marathon continues:

Date (last day)

Opposition

Venue

Toss

Result

Bat’

Bowl’

Total points

29 June 2018

WORC’SHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

23 July 2018

SURREY

TB

U

LI183R

1

2

3

22 Aug 2018

Hampshire

Rose Bowl

U

L270R

-

3

3

31 Aug 2018

Surrey

The Oval

U

LI125R

-

3

3

07 Sep 2018

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

5

2

12

13 Sep 2018

ESSEX

TB

W

L8W

-

3

3

26 Sep 2018

SOMERSET

TB

L

LI146R

-

2

2

08 Apr 2019

YORKSHIRE

TB

U

D

4

3

12

13 Apr 2019

SOMERSET

TB

U

LI14R

2

3

4*

16 May 2019

Essex

Chelmsford

W

L8W

-

3

3

23 May 2019

Hampshire

Newclose

U

L244R

1

3

4

06 June 2019

Warwickshire

Edgbaston

L

D

-

1

6

12 June 2019

HAMPSHIRE

WELBECK

U

D

-

-

5

20 June 2019

Kent

Tunbridge Wells

U

L285R

2

3

5

03 July 2019

ESSEX

TB

W

LI123R

1

1

2

09 July 2019

Somerset

Taunton

L

L132R

1

3

4

15 July 2019

SURREY

TB

L

L167R

-

3

3

21 Aug 2019

Yorkshire

Scarborough

U

L143R

-

3

3

12 Sep 2019

KENT

TB

L

L227R

-

3

3

19 Sep 2019

WARWICKSHIRE

TB

L

L8W

5

1

6

26 Sep 2019

Surrey

The Oval

L

D

-

2

7

04 Aug 2020

Derbyshire

TB (away**)

L

L3W

3

3

6



After over powering Durham last week, Yorkshire now have the option to strengthen their eleven with the possible return of Duanne Olivier and Jonny Baistow.

Ben Coad and Matt Fisher will both be missing with various muscle strains, however.

The Yorkshire squad:

Jonny Bairstow (Wicketkeeper)
Harry Brook
Dominic Leech
Adam Lyth
Dawid Malan
Duanne Olivier
Steven Patterson (Captain)
Mat Pillans
Jack Shutt
Jonny Tattersall
Jordan Thompson
Tom Kohler-Cadmore
Jared Warner

Notts unfortunately, will be without Luke Fletcher for at least two more games, therefore missing both of the 2 Division 1 sides in the group. Meanwhile, Joey Evison is sidelined with a foot injury for one game. Let's hope the upbeat Peter Moores has someone yet to be revealed up his sleeve, or preferably plural players up both sleeves.

Playing Samit Patel at eight worked well because last season's under-achieving repeat offenders continued where they had left off in September, and with Samit at eight he acted much like Chris Read of a few seasons ago, bailing-out the team but could Samit's abilities have been better used higher-up the order? Probably!

The squad:

As you were gentlemen;

With the exception of the injured Joey Evison, for who comes in Matthew Carter, it's the same squad that failed to beat Derbyshire in an exciting conclusion on Tuesday.

Haseeb Hameed
Chris Nash
Ben Duckett
Joe Clarke
Steven Mullaney
Peter Trego
Tom Moores
Samit Patel
Matthew Carter
Jake Ball
Zak Chappell
Tom Barber

You can perhaps draw the conclusions that Chris Nash is going to be offered a contract extension at the expense of younger players, that Jack Blatherwick is on the way out at the end of the season and that 2019 has been erased from history. How else could you explain the absence of LPW?

79 comments:

  1. Spinning deck with Carter and Patterson White in needed. very strong batting line up from them

    ReplyDelete
  2. Probably not possible at such short notice too prepare the pitch needed, But you would have to think Notts best chance of success would be with their spinners.... Thats if they can find them first!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Whilst other counties are giving opportunities to to their young talent,our management select a predictable 12.

    Unless Newell is daft enough to give Nash a contract extension, he should have been replaced by an in form Slater.

    Duckett should also have been replaced by the invisible man (Patterson White).

    Unfortunately,Moores suffers the same mindset as Newell, when it comes to team selection.
    The only excuse , would be that these are the only 12 fit players available, in which case, this would be a sad indictment on the squad that has been dis- assembled under this management.




    ReplyDelete
  4. With the current state of finances in sport and in cricket in particular how is it justifiable for Notts to employ both Newell and Moores. Performances now suggest that our lowly position will continue for at least two years and so just how can the Club still pay these chaps?

    ReplyDelete
  5. After losing to an under strength Debyshire team it's difficult to have any plan or direction whatsoever with this mob. As comments above, yes 2019 appears to have been erased from memory and what will it be for 2020 ? Probably something like "Well it was an unprecedented set of events, all teams were under prepared and results didn't really matter in that truncated season " It does make you wonder what the redoubtable Teflon Mick has had to do in this strange season of little cricket, certainly being one member of the staff who wasn't furloughed. But what a great job to have. We'll pay you a six figure sum(allegedly), you're not under any pressure to perform or justify this with regard to team performance and you can stay as long as you want(i understand he is paid staff and not on a fixed contract term)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Heart breaking re LP-W.
    The best thing for any youngster who is good at cricket in the County or City of Nottingham, is to approach any county rather than ours' I hate having to say that, but it is the truth

    If Matt Carter plays, I wish him well. Another lad who does not seem to get encouragement

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just a bit more please. Did young
    Weighall choose to go to the Foxes ahead of us ?
    If so, that is understandable, but means DOC and Head Coach have reduced us to a second rate and tier county, not only division wise, but in reputation too.


    The situation with losing out on Ashes Tests, and the massive and costly blunder of the Six Restaurant, show the people running our club are no longer competent.

    The decline will continue unless they go

    ReplyDelete
  8. What's the sodding point in the aimless Notts Twitter feed posting pictures of a "resplendent" Trent Bridge under the heading "Marvellous ", when we are not allowed in to see the cricket ? Are we supposed to gain some sort of satisfaction from reminding ourselves of this constantly?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ben Slater, 10 ball duck against Derbyshire.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I can't remember if I've put this on before but the Chappell of Rest told me and my mate down at the palatial Lady Bay last season when he was playing for the stiffs that he's been plagued by a niggling injury that meant he constantly had to miss games, but the Notts medical team had now finally located the problem. Guess we'll never know in this truncated season but let's all hope this has now been sorted out and he can turn into a useful performer for us in the future. It's a pity Coughlin, Milns and Seabiscuit all decided to leave as we could have had decent cover bowling wise. Regarding Benny Slater, in sport, you are always a better player when you are out of the side. He certainly hasn't pulled up any trees for us so far. I guess the question would be is it not better to go with him, age being on his side in this truncated season over your mate from Sussex, namely Gnasher in the final year of his 3 year deal. Unless of course Pete Moores is going to offer another year or maybe even another two ?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Libby 130 NO!!! Struggling to find your form at Notts - move anywhere else!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. PJ it's against Glamorgan. Div 1 is Premier League, Div 2 is National League North. Samit couldn't get a run last year for Notts but got 60 for Glamorgan on loan, as he scored 2 double centuries back to back in Div 2 in 2016, as he got 50 against Derby last week.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As for today, wouldn't fancy chasing many on day 8 of this pitch. How have Notts got away with this? The rules in the Championship say you can't play twice on the same 4 day pitch for at least 6 weeks. Notts have obviously pored through the Bob Willis rules and spotted a loophole. Anything for a win.

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://resources.ecb.co.uk/ecb/document/2020/07/31/bec19c77-837a-4211-9660-7784bbca788f/Playing-Conditions_The_Bob_Willis_Trophy-vF.pdf

    Nothing in rules about use of repeat pitches

    ReplyDelete
  15. MAG read what I said. Nothing in Bob Willis rules, but in normal championship rules. They've done nothing wrong under this year's conditions but when you've got all the square minus the tv pitches to play with, we all know the tactic.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Even this year, read ecb pitch regulations, pitch protocol. It is expected that 2 consecutive Bob Willis trophy matches should not be played on the same pitch less than 7 days from the finish of the first.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with A46 above - the ECB Regs appear to rule out playing a second Match on a Pitch used within the previous 7 days and I don't see where this is altered in the Bob Willis Rules. Anyhow, not a big deal in the scale of things and with hybrid Pitches likely to soon be the order of the day.

    Libby 142 NO - regardless of A46(N) above Notts are ALSO a Division 2 Club so he appears to be better than most of Notts Batsmen!!!- and he can also bowl. Luke Wood not doing too well though at Lancashire.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Regarding the pitch it's probably all in the wording Expected is not quite the same as Not Allowed. Anyhow I'm sure Notts had to get permission from the match referee and/or directly from the ECB to use the same pitch. It could be related to the fact we had a home game thrust upon us at short notice against Lancashire and therefore with three games in three weeks, the ground staff had insufficient time to prepare three pitches and three weeks, who knows?

    Libby had enough chances at Notts and failed to take them. Other than an excellent century against Durham at the Riverside he tended to get his big scores on festherbeds eg a hundred in the pink ball batathon against Worcester, a ton on a wicket at Cardiff where Cooke and Ingram batted all day and a 100 in the last match of the season against Sussex.

    What is clear is that the BWT has seen much weakened teams being put out, even Surrey are struggling; bringing in loanees from Worcester (Finch) and Sussex (Evans), it's really all a bit Mickey Mouse. However it's a great opportunity for youngsters to shine if the counties give them their chance .....some are taking up this rare opportunity more than others!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a pitch prepared 2 or 3 wickets away from the one being used. With the unexpected game next week, it was perhaps the only course of action possible in the time frame; to reuse the Derbyshire track and let the fresh one bake for a week.

      Delete
  19. Suspect, due to pure desperation, we would have offered Jake Libby a new contract. But his stats over the games he
    played for us were bang average and he just didn't convert his starts into big scores regularly enough. As MAGs says, there are some very strange teams being put out in this weird season. It shows just how vital good quality overseas lads are for most counties.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It is a strange competition, but as Harry says, it is cricket.

    The lack of overseas stars and England players has given opportunities to up and comers like Andersson and Thompson to do well.

    Trying to be kind, it would be nice if Notts put in another 3 (minimum) youngsters for all the remaining matches .

    Yes seconds were "sent home", but as with Matt, they can be recalled, and look, he did OK. The World has many threats to it sadly, but Notts giving young players a chance is not one of them !

    ReplyDelete
  21. First question re preview of Day 2 already answered !

    ReplyDelete
  22. Desperate for Restaurant Six to reopen9 August 2020 at 12:53

    There's a hole in Ben Duckett dear Lisa......anyone remember the Northants batsman that cracked 80odd on his Notts debut in no time with a flurry of crisply hit boundaries. He now looks petrified to wield his Gunn&Moore, more a gun with less.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It,s the Raddy Rd Fish Bar for Me9 August 2020 at 22:55

      Den Bucket needs a spell on the subs bench. Time to being back LPW,who should never have been dropped

      Delete
  23. Buttler, now Moores !

    Under fire keepers fight back

    Word re Matt Carter. They have gone with him and need to back him

    Again Notts have a real chance

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For the first time since last Tuesday, Notts have a real chance. But it's only half time.

      Delete
  24. Superbly well played Tom Moores, you get plenty of stick, a lot deserved but full credit for your brilliant innings today. On paper at least, on which sport is never played, our batting is extremely strong with Trego, Moores and Samit all genuine batsmen to come after the first five in the order. This one has to be in the bag surely, barring something extraordinarily from Lyth, Bairstow or Malan?




    ReplyDelete
  25. I guess years of watching Notts have led me into believing that its not over until the fat lady sings, Having said that you would have to say that you would much rather be in Notts position than the Yorkies

    All we need now is for Jake to carry on his previous good form and (hopefully) a repeat from ZC (without the daft runs) that should set things up nicely for Notts triumvirate of spinners to make use of a a track which should by now be helping them more than it has been.

    I have in the past been guilty of having a moan about Notts woes, It's so nice for once to actually say well done and especially Tom Moores, There is a lot to be said about playing your natural game, TM is not a blocker,Far better imo that he plays to his strengths, If he does that then you can be certain that this century will be far from his last...

    ReplyDelete
  26. A Voice of Treason10 August 2020 at 08:24

    !!!!Get Real People!!!

    Notts have a commanding position, do they? One session this morning all could easily be undone. If no wickets fall and with a scoring rate of 4 because of lousy bowling, Yorkshire have a lead and hold all the cards. Whose commanding position is it then?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yes, the Voice of Treason brings some much needed realism to the table.
    Can we really expect Lythe ,Bairstow and Malan to fail twice against Notts attack. Highly unlikely, but stranger things have happened.

    We are so desperate for a Notts win, that any first innings lead seems like a cause for optimism in modern times at Trent Bridge.

    Come on Notts, make us proud.

    ReplyDelete
  28. It’s a vicious circle.After two years we go into games not expecting to win. When I say we, I mean the team and the supporters ( though I can’t really speak for the team or indeed other supporters, just myself)

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yes both Treason and Dick echo my own thoughts. Let's be realistic (a) when all four of their top batsmen failed they still got 264. If only one of them succeeds 300 is perfectly possible and we can't count chickens chasing 200 - let alone more in the entirely possible scenario Treason outlines; (b) we have demonstrated time and again since 2016 that there is literally no situation from which we can't lose a match. I won't bore with examples there are far too many; (c) this is partly because of a cliche: "losing is a habit". Unfortunately this is one of those cliches which is actually correct.

    Let's though also be positive. Yesterday was not without its grisly moments but overall the team showed proper fight and spirit, refused to subside when under pressure, batted with some skill especially Samit and built a significant lead when parity was at several stages far from certain. These are qualities we have missed for a long time and this is what we want to see - a team of which we might again be proud. And let's also be clear about what a marvellous knock that was by Tom Moores, showing all those fighting qualities and really dealing superbly and with great nous with the nine down tactic employed by Yorkshire about which everyone on here has been so disparaging. I am so pleased for him.

    What we need is evidence that yesterday was the start of a shift not just a one off good day (though a disappointing performance overall there was some decent cricket played against Derbyshire too, mostly in the lower order batting). Let's all hope.

    Come on Notts!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Ben Slater is ready to return to Notts having bagged a pair against Derbyshire in his second loan game for Leicester. He's well a truely got over the aberration of scoring a century in his opening innings last week.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's normally a reason if you've only hit a handful of centuries whilst average late 20s/very early 30s when you've got to your late 20s ? Much better record in 50over games.

      Delete
  31. So, have we pulled a flanker using a used pitch, possibly bending the rules or certainly ethics of the sport on the basis the Tykes, not only two main bowlers down, clearly have no spin threat whatsoever or with the Derby and Lanky away games now at home had little choice but to play on a surface which clearly was always going to give us a massive advantage? It's certainly nice having had to witness Sidebotton, Brookes , Lythe and Ballance steamroller us into the ground over recent seasons. Just one disappointment we couldn't witness the whole of Headingley descending to the Home of Cricket and taking over the Fox Rd stand. A particularly UNsporting bunch of away fans, who never applaud when the Home players play outstanding cricket, it's a real shame we can't see them crying into their cloth caps.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Victory or defeat in this match, the fundamental problems at Trent Bridge remain

    There is next to no chance of young players building a career at the club

    Newell and Moores appear to have no new ideas. Two doing the job badly when one new and ambitious coach is what is needed

    The financial disaster of the Six Restaurant combined with the virus leaves the club weak financially and as one of these was instigated by the CEO, no rational business case remains for her to continue in the job.
    Was a Cost Value Analysis even done for the capital expansion of the Radcliffe Road Stand/Complex ?

    The allocation of future English Test grounds for the Ashes shows Trent Bridge lagging in a distant sixth place, possibly seventh with the Ageas Bowl doing so well in lockdown

    ReplyDelete
  33. All valid points raised Rich.

    Our management/ coaching staff of Newell, Moores, Franks, Shine, Botha, Pick, Matt Wood, and god knows who else is ridiculous. Jesus, there are more of them than we have bowlers, especially fit ones, all drawing substantial salaries, that the club can ill afford.

    If they decided to try and sell the six restaurant who would buy it. They would struggle to give it away in the present economic climate.

    No financially, the club are in an almighty pickle coupled with a committee as effective as a chocolate tea pot in 80 degree heat, and you realise that the immediate future looks exceedingly grim.

    On the playing side, the complacency in allowing a number of talented bowlers to leave for pastures new in recent seasons, is now coming back to haunt the club big time with
    the injuries to Ball and Fletcher. No doubt Chappell will be the next one to go lame, and possibly Carter as well with the overs he has had to bowl in this game .

    Maybe Mick will have to start earning his money , by getting off his backside, and start scouting local cricket for some much needed bowling talent.

    To say that the situation is embarrassing, is quite definitely, an understatement.
























    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mick Newell's job creation scheme (mates only need apply), is alive and well post-COVID.

      Delete
    2. Fibonacci the Scorer11 August 2020 at 12:46

      Is it numbers game?

      If success is proportional to the number of coaches and analysts employed, firstly there must be a awful lot of people employed at some counties. Secondly, how many coaches are we short of being successful or at least winning games?

      I think it more to do with quality than quantity eh!

      Delete
  34. Despite all, still hope Notts win.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bitter and Twisted11 August 2020 at 14:46

      Difficult to imagine a Notts win from here, 89/7. Might need some of those "special eye drops" the umpire must have been using, hallucinating at least one extra stump, judging by his decisions.

      Delete
  35. Just insane. No county side should be this pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  36. This is it, this is enough from the arrogant and hopeless management !

    ReplyDelete
  37. Heads must surely roll now.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Well, Peter Moores and Mick Newell must now be EVEN PROUDER of the lads - along with Jason Gallian; Peter Moores; Chairman Richard; Kate Davies and others on our beloved and learned Committee )with the notable few and proud exceptions) all, of course, even more proudly overseen by Ms P - who is the Line Manager of Mr Newell so to still be in a job he MUST be doing a good job!!! I wish that I could get a job where failure was so very richly rewarded.

    In all seriousness this is now totally unacceptable - Derbyshire have just had 'back to back' wins - whereas Notts no longer know what it even feels like to win.

    I hold the Committee collectively responsible - they HAVE the solutions but are scared to try to dismiss anyone for fear of possible repercussions - those on the Committee who are business people would never tolerate it in their own businesses but it is OK for them to see Notts run into the ground.

    Surely there must be enough Members now to call an EGM and seek to pass a vote of no confidence in the Committee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Noddy from Toytown11 August 2020 at 15:17

      What happens if there aren't any members, because they've all asked for their money back?

      Delete
    2. Last info was that probably less than 1000 members requested money back.

      Delete
    3. Derbyshire showed the way, a team digging in and fighting for each other, Notts have neither. Derbyshire have policy of bringing on youngsters from within along with astute signing and 'old heads', Notts policy is entice average players with the chequebook and try and buy success.

      Delete
  39. Raddy Road Rocker11 August 2020 at 15:35

    Nothing to lose from a radical burning of the dead wood now.

    Peter Moores has shown to be useless, he has lost his touch, he is a has been and has to go. Mick Newell without his cheque book would have been found out years ago; he has no ability to manage, motivate or make rational decisions and must go. Some don't like to blame the captain, but in a result business and not producing results, he is the figure head of the team, and so has to stand down. Peter Trego, why did we sign him? He serves no purpose. Ben Duckett, I sure he has been planted into a team by the 17 other counties in order the sabotage everything. Joe Clarke might be talented, he's just a weak boy. I'm sure they all have excuses about luck, the pitch, the schedule and Covid break but 23 games without a win, 17 of which are humiliating defeats. Someone has to take the responsibility. Lisa Pursehouse is probably the only one "man enough"! If she has power to hire and fire, she can start with the bloke she lives with.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Is anybody surprised anymore ? We still can't win against a Tykes sides massively depleted of bowling options. We are afer all, the arch bottlers(remember 12 off 12 with 8 men left in the hutch last season). This season will just be erased from memory as last season appears to have been. Even Dave Bracegirdle almost got critical, after plugging his book with big Fletch. All that drivel we've heard from Mullaney and Moores all season about wanting to make the members proud of the team and we produce two performances like that to continue the disaster run in red ball cricket. People flipping burgers at Macdonalds are under more pressure than our Head Coach and DoC. Always liked Mullaney as a genuine, 100percent committed cricketer, but surely he's got to step down and let some other mug attempt to captain this shocking collection of has beens, under achievers and bottlers ? I suspect he would come under pressure for his place in the red ball side if he did and guess he'll stick it out but how long can you keep repeating yourself and clutching at the very few positives from each defeat?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Whoever said we hadn't hit rock bottom last week was dead right. We'll be greeting Captain Nemo at these depths. I hope the players are growing an exo-skeleton because they appear to be spineless - obviously evolved that way to survive at these depths of ineptitude.

    ReplyDelete
  42. OK - so let's now hear from the Committee - the Members elected representatives - Members elected them, Members were willing to allow them to stop 2 of us even standing for the Committee - who voted for Ms. Huggard because I don't know anyone who did? This is a disgrace of a Committee; a disgrace of a cricket team; a disgrace of Coaches; a disgrace from top to bottom - time for some of them to show some personal integrity and resign.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Voice of Treason11 August 2020 at 16:16

      No one is going to resign in these uncertain times. There are mouths to feed, wine cellars to stock, pony club stabling to pay for and golf club membership to up keep. Be sensible PJ.

      Delete
  43. Abject rubbish. The highly touted signings of Clarke and Duckett have not worked. They were reasonable players before they came to Trent Bridge, what has happened? Surely the time is up for Mick Newell and Peter Moores, they should give way for someone younger, more energetic, more in tune with the players - Chris Read?
    The other signings of Nash, Trego (who I always liked), Barber are clearly past it, Ben Slater is not good enough - that is six players signed over the last 30 months who cannot produce the goods.
    I will not name who has left but Milns does spring to mind. Surely Alex Hales can be persuaded to play the last three 4 days games, he is better than what is in the present side.
    Peter Moores and Mick Newell have to make way for someone else, can't the people running this club spending the members money see this.
    Disgraceful that is all I can say when a winning position is just given away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why would Alex Hales waste his time playing for this garbage team. Agree with everything else though.

      Delete
  44. Oh dear !
    Oh dear ,oh dear oh dear !
    What a humiliating experience watching Notts fold like that .
    How could they ?
    Against a weakened team , one or two playing their first County match .
    On a wicket that was fairly static to say it was 8 days old .
    As a member who has requested (and received) a full Membership refund the only very minor consolation is that it didnt cost me anything to watch it .Imagine actually being on the ground and seeing that rubbish served up - again - and again .
    I am fully expecting one or two resignations in the next few hours . Surely someone at Notts has the decency to step down ?
    SOMEONE SURELY HAS TO TAKE SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHATS GOING ON AT NOTTS ?
    Which famous person said to another famous person "GO ! FOR GODS SAKE GO!
    Something has to give . Notts simply cant go on like this . We need a fresh team at the top with new ideas , proper close season signings ( Not geriatrics hanging on for an extra year or two of pension contributions).
    Most people agree that Peter Moores is a very nice man and can chat the chat . But he seems on auto pilot most of the time - a sort of robotic approach to what he does and says .
    Peter now is the time to go and let someone else have a crack at motivating the players we have and encourage others to sign for the Club over the coming winter months .
    Mick Newall - surely your time is up ? Do the honourable thing and go without banrupting the club with a massive pay off.
    As to the other coaching and backroom staff ? Well take a good look at yourselves and see the state the Club is now in . A laughing stock .
    As PJ suggests - the Notts Committee should resign en -masse and an emergency meeting called to elect a fresh cCommittee. No one could do any worse than the present bunch ( with one or two exceptions - we KNOW which ones)
    Sorry to e so blunt but SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE - and quickly !
    A change of subject but possibly very important .
    With no Corona vaccine in sight then we can assume that social distancing will remain for the forseeable future . For Notts this means the end of massive Blast 20 gates of 12,000plus next year . There may be a crowd limit of 4,000-5,000,6000. This means a MASSIVE drop of income for the Club Not just from paying spectators but reduced commercial activities and a pull back in sponsorship revenue .
    SO the much unwanted 100 Ball competition could suddenly become a life saver for the County Clubs next season . The ECB are presumably guaranteed a certain level of income from the TV broadcasters ,SKY and BBC. Therefore urgently needed cash will be distributed to the 18 Counties . I could be wrong but I seem to remember a sum of £1.5 million for each Club per season for 5 years . This will be a life saver and enable Clubs to keep going albeit in a reduced capacity .The big spending days of lucrative players contracts may now be at an end - in the UK at any rate .
    So after todays Notts capitulation what do other Notts fans think should be done to turn things round ??

    ReplyDelete
  45. Newell out and Moores out by Thurday, which will never happen.

    ReplyDelete
  46. And what of 'The General?' (Paul Franks) - a thoroughly through-and through Notts player and Coach whose loyalty now begins to look more like folly. BUT, is there something far more worrying at Notts? We DO have sufficient talent to play far better so what does that say about the CEO / Director of Cricket / Head Coach/ Chairman / Cricket Committee? There seems a total lack of accountability - so my suggestions:
    1) The Head Coach should not be line managed by the CEO.
    2) The Cricket Committee should be accountable to the full Committee and the membership for results and should also contain non-Committee members.
    3) All staff should have clear Aims and Objectives in their Contracts subject to Annual at reviews - failure to deliver on those Aims and Objectives to be used in matters relating to continued employment status.
    4) Continuous loss-making elements (i.e. the 'Six' Restaurant) to cease if not making a clear Net profit after 3 years unless the Members decide otherwise.
    5) The salaries of all staff to include a Performance-related element.
    6) Members votes to over-ride those of the Committee.

    Anyone else got any bright ideas?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ban any use of the term 'red ball' from NCCC and Trent Bridge. 'Championship' or 'First Class' should be the only terms usable.

      Winning the Championship and producing world-class players are the club's only purposes - everything else is there to pay for or support those aims.

      'Red ball' and 'White ball' are used to make us believe there is a parity of value, and there isn't. Just isn't.

      Delete
  47. Seems an easy way out of this hole to me, PM/MN/SM need to fall on their swords, whether it will happen is another matter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steven could just do the honourable thing and stand down. Notts last First Class win with him as skipper, at TB was 7 May 2018

      Delete
  48. Reeks of the bad days of the 1970s I’m afraid, in fact worse.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Lack of funds will ultimately decide, who stays and who will be released, because make no mistake, Mick ain't going to give up his job,lightly, considering it will probably be his final paid employment in cricket. Let's face it, no one else will be daft enough to take him on.

    I think even our neighbours down the motorway at Grace Road, will fancy their chances of beating us after this latest debacle.

    If the club is in a financial mess now, wait till the membership subs drop off a cliff for the 2021 season , because who in the right mind will pay to watch this rubbish with the current management in situ.


    ReplyDelete
  50. Today was even spectacular for Notts standards.

    Top score 19, most balls faced by any Notts batsman 39, no-one batted for an hour.

    These stats would embarrass a Sunday team let alone Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club.

    A complete debacle.

    I suggest picking eleven young cricketers from Nottinghamshire Weekend teams for the match next week.

    I reckon many would like the opportunity. I am sure that some could even bat for an hour, score 20 or more and face 40 balls.

    Very, very sad to see for our proud old club.

    ReplyDelete
  51. An excellent Day 4 Summary with appropriate passion at the end. I only look at 'nottsview' but am saddened that other Social media contain 'vile and totally uncalled for' comments - there is no excuse for that.

    It would also be difficult to attribute / evidence any lack of caring about Notts to any of the main 'protagonists' in this whole sorry episode but that does not mean that something is not extremely seriously wrong at Notts.

    Personal and collective responsibility issues ought to come into play and certain individuals need to seriously examine their own situations. The start would be for the Chairman to resign with immediate effect and for a new Chairperson to be elected by the Committee - someone like Jeff Moore.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Disappointed does not reflect my feelings at the moment, It really is time for the club too take action and clear out the dead wood.

    Sadly that's not going to happen, Turkeys do not vote for Christmas,The committee by fiddling with the rules have made themselves pretty fireproof.

    That being the case pretty much all members can do is not rejoin,If enough do that and make their reasons for non-renewal known to the club then maybe the committee might realise that the days of us blindly following them are now a thing of the past.

    If I am honest I doubt anything will happen, Come the next match PM & SM will say the same tired platitudes and we will again see more of the same we have read about today

    If any of the committee are reading this then please do the decent thing and actually get the club you supposedly support back where they belong, And if that means firing people then DO It...

    ReplyDelete
  53. Day 8- you reap what you sow.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Peter Moores coaching philosophies part 2 on the website tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  55. 23 games without a win doesn't do it justice. To give a better time perspective, Novak Djokovic won the Wimbledon Singles title in 2018, 2019 and was denied a three peat in 2020. This has all happened since Notts last won a first class match.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Derby are unlucky. They've got to play Yorkshire 1st team on Saturday.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Even the girdler. Said it wasn't good enough.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yes, well said A46(N), presumably our tactics(?) spectacularly failed yet again. Had we not learnt our lessons from last season, but this time a Tykes reserve side and we still couldn't win. Worryingly, Pete Moores once an England coach dragged down into Teflon Mick's mediocrity of non achievement supported by a committee clinging to the financial success if Trent Bridge to masquerade the teams abysmal, shocking, inept dire performances in red ball Cricket.

    P

    ReplyDelete
  59. Quite a short and terse interview with Mullaney on the Notts Site - interesting that neither Moores nor Newell put themselves forward to explain the loss - but, of course, as he has made clear before the DoC does not personally interfere in First Team matters!!! Will Moores now pay the price for saving the DoC's bacon when he accepted the position full-time of Head Coach? Is the Committee still alive?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. " We didn't deal well with pressure" - no Steven you crumbled, offered zero resistance and basically just gave up. Please stand down, let someone else have a go. It surely can't get any worse.

      Delete
    2. Don't disagree Kenneth, the problem is who? Gnasher on a short term basis - or do you then have to give him another 2 years when he's probably not going to justify his place in the team as a batter. Or, if we've not gone completely skint, do we bring in a Captain from outside on a 3 year deal ?

      Delete
    3. Voice of Treason12 August 2020 at 15:54

      Mike Brearley would never have been picked for England had he not been captain. But I'm not advocating Gnasher necessarily short or long term. Someone has to give Mull the nudge if he won't jump for himself and the senior players have seen it all before elsewhere. They have been signed to mentor and advice so shouldn't they stop hiding in shadows and talk to Mull? The damage is being done to Mullaney himself and the club!

      Delete
  60. No contract for Nash and pay Trego off . They ate not the way to go. IMO we need to build a new team from within

    County squads are smaller now, far fewer bargains to bring in. So we seem to get unperforming players, or players with issues that counties want rid of

    We now have 3 matches, and no chance of qualifying . A perfect chance to give the future a gateway to learn

    ReplyDelete

Please share your thoughts...