Jos Buttler promises to ‘smile more’
Will MacPherson 21/01
Jos Buttler has promised a more positive England team than ever after receiving Christmas presents encouraging him to smile more and practising looking upbeat in the mirror.
When Brendon McCullum was appointed England’s white-ball coach he said his primary task was getting his captain’s smile back after a bruising period that had seen him become snappy and quiet. Buttler said McCullum’s appointment as all-format head coach and some time away from the game with a calf injury had reinvigorated him.
“I’m in a good place,” he said ahead of Wednesday’s first T20 against India in Kolkata. “I’ve been practising my smile in front of the mirror. A few Christmas presents may have been egged in that way, but I feel in a really good place. I’m excited.
“I was a Brendon McCullum fan as a player, and would have always loved to play with him. So to get the chance to work with him as the coach, and having seen the impact he and his coaches have had – he’s very big on method – is exciting.
“I had some time away from the game, which was forced by injury, but actually it was probably healthy as well. You get a bit of perspective and a new baby, children, give you that in abundance. Little things, like putting on the England kit, and looking around the ground here and taking it all in, looking around the dressing and going ‘wow, this is a serious squad of players,’ that’s exciting.”
Buttler admitted that he had become grumpy: “Maybe. Results can do that. We all talk about wanting to play exciting stuff and enjoy it. In professional sport, the results do want to play a part in that.
“I’ve had some good conversations with Baz [McCullum] about that. At this time of your career, and hopefully I’ve still got a bit of time left, to make this the best time of your career.
“I played against Baz all those years ago in that [2015] World Cup game in Wellington, when he had four slips and a gully from ball one. So, whether I’ll quite get that far, we’ll have to see.”
Buttler and McCullum named the first team of their alliance, installing Ben Duckett as England’s opening batsman across all formats. Duckett will open with Phil Salt, who takes the wicketkeeping gloves ahead of Buttler and Jamie Smith, with the captain ensconced in his new position at first drop. Vice-captain Harry Brook spearheads a powerful middle order that includes Jacob Bethell and Jamie Overton, one of four genuinely fast bowlers alongside Gus Atkinson, Jofra Archer and Mark Wood.
Buttler promised that all players, including the overlooked Smith, would get an opportunity on the eight-match tour of India.
Here’s the five biggest calls of the new era ...
Duckett up top
In the three-format era, only Marcus Trescothick – now England’s batting coach – has been first choice in every format for a considerable period of time. Duckett has the chance to follow him, by playing in a very similar style in all three formats. Under Matthew Mott, he did not receive many white-ball opportunities, and he has not opened in a T20 since his debut in 2019.
“He’s got an excellent reputation against spin but actually when the field is up in the powerplay, I think he has even more options,” said Buttler. “With only two fielders out, he’s an incredibly tough guy to defend with all the different areas that he can hit the ball. He’s been playing brilliantly well in all formats. You look at someone in England cricket now who could open the innings in every format of the game – I think it’s credit to the way he’s played over the last few years and he fully deserves his chance.”
Buttler drops the gloves – and installs Brook as right-hand man
Duckett will open with Salt, who keeps ahead of the new No 3 Buttler. The captain wants to be closer to his bowlers, and concentrate more on tactics. McCullum made a similar change late in his playing career.
Buttler described his new vice-captain, Brook, as “as positive a captain as I’ve ever seen” when he has stood in. Buttler wants to borrow that attitude and “lean on Brook for advice in the field”. Brook is fast becoming the cross-format heartbeat of English cricket.
Bethell’s rise continues
Six months ago Jacob Bethell was uncapped, but he is rapidly cementing himself as first choice in all three formats, with franchises – including Virat Kohli’s Royal Challengers Bangalore – queuing up to sign him. A stylish No 3 in Tests and crisp middle order hitter in the white-ball game, with handy bowling and outstanding fielding to boot. Being a left-hander helps, and he may float in the order.
“He’s been someone in English cricket that’s been talked about for a while,” said Buttler. “We know the talent that he possesses, even when he’s been playing in the under-19s, he was a name that you would hear talked about. He’s going to be a special player.”
All-rounder Overton adds snarl
Buttler has known Surrey’s Jamie Overton since their Somerset days, and the pair were first in an England squad together 13 years ago. Overton has taken time to find his role, but it is a sought-after one: finisher with the bat, nasty fastie with the ball, and bucket hands in the field. He brings a bit of snarl to the England side, too.
“He’s a really well-rounded T20 cricketer now,” said Buttler. “Having seen him at Somerset all those years ago, he’s now a really experienced player, has a great mentality, really aggressive and competitive, which is what we want.”
Emphasis is on serious pace
When it comes to pace bowling, England do not want to do things by halves, only selecting genuine quicks. Overton is one of four quicks in this XI, with Brydon Carse and Saqib Mahmood waiting in the wings. Adil Rashid is the only specialist spinner, but Bethell and Liam Livingstone are handy match-up bowlers. Buttler wants wickets, not defence.
“You need to get ahead, and in this day and age you need to try to get people out,” he said. “If they spend any time at the crease, they can hurt you.”
Saturday, 18 January 2025.
PTG 4738-22741.
PTG Editor.
Saturday, 18 January 2025.
PTG 4738-22736.
Daniel Brettig.
Melbourne Age.
Wednesday, 8 January 2025.
PTG 4731-22709.
Janice Turner.
London Times.
Saturday, 4 January 2025.
PTG 4726-22687.
Elizabeth Ammon.
London Times.
Friday, 3 January 2024,
PTG 4725-22682.
England will not boycott their match against Afghanistan in the Champions Trophy next month but the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) has reiterated its stance that it will not schedule any bilateral series against the Afghanistan men’s team because of the Taliban government’s stance on women playing sport. Afghanistan are the only Test-playing nation that do not have a women’s team for, among a raft of restrictions placed on Afghanistan women by the Taliban government, they are prevented from taking part in any sport.
Last month Greg Barclay, the outgoing chai of the International Cricket Council (ICC), said that Australia and England had merely done the expedient thing by announcing they would not play bilateral games against Afghanistan after the 2021 Taliban takeover of the country and a ban on women in sport, and that “if you really want to make a political statement, don’t play them in a World Cup” (PTG 4696-22569, 5 December 2024). Cricket Australia (CA) chair Mike Baird rejected such accusations of hypocrisy (PTG 4697-22573, 6 December 2024).
Before 2021, when the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan, a women’s team had been in existence since 2010. In 2020, 25 female cricketers were handed paid contracts by the Afghanistan Cricket Board (ACB), but after the Taliban returned to power, women were banned from universities, parks and sports, and the homes of female athletes were raided, ending any hopes of the Afghanistan women’s team playing their first ever international fixture.
Most of the members of the Afghanistan women’s team fled the country — many ending up in Australia — but the team was unable to reform. The former players wrote to the ICC last year to ask for help to create a team of Afghan refugees and give them coaching and administration support, although that has not yet been forthcoming from the international governing body (PTG 4548-21965, 2 July 2024).
The Afghanistan men’s team, who are coached by the former England batsman Jonathan Trott, do not play or train in their home country. They are instead based in Dubai, which is also where the majority of their home matches take place.
England have previous experience of an international tournament being affected by political issues. At the 2003 World Cup, hosted jointly by South Africa, Kenya and Zimbabwe, England refused to face Zimbabwe in their opening pool match in Harare, citing concerns over having to shake hands with president Robert Mugabe before the match and having also received death threats in the months leading up to the tournament.
The ICC refused England’s claims that these were valid reasons to pull out, the game did not take place and Zimbabwe were awarded the four match points — which ultimately helped the joint hosts advance to the Super Sixes stage at the expense of England.
In 2023, Australia withdrew from a men’s one-day series against Afghanistan citing the Taliban’s decision to impose further restrictions on women’s and girls’ education, to which the ACB reacted strongly, describing the decision as “unfair” and “pathetic”. Australia also called off a planned T20 series against Afghanistan in early 2024 and have committed to not playing any bilateral cricket against them. However, they did play against them in last year’s T20 World Cup because international tournaments are run by the ICC, whereas bilateral series are organised by the individual cricket boards.
The ECB have followed Australia’s stance and do not have any future bilateral series arranged against Afghanistan. They last played against them in the group stage of the 2023 World Cup in India, losing by 69 runs.
“We have been working on discussions at ICC level with other member countries to understand what action will be taken” Richard Gould, the ECB chief executive, said last year. “The ICC’s view is that they are not able to have an impact on a domestic government’s policy. I don’t think that there is an appetite for action amongst the majority of ICC members directly against Afghanistan”.
Our predictions for cricket in 2025: England to win Ashes and Dillon Pennington’s Test breakthrough
Pace can tip balance in touring side’s favour next winter and Notts seamer possesses all the weapons to enrich an already potent attack
It promises to be a fascinating year for the Bazball project – here is what I expect from Brendon McCullum’s side, plus my thoughts on how the County Championship will pan out.
Breakthrough player: Dillon Pennington
Assuming Jacob Bethell has already broken through into England teams – and will hopefully major as a top-three Test batsman – what England need most is a new-ball Test bowler to partner Gus Atkinson (Brydon Carse being a third seamer, and Ben Stokes in future a fifth seamer if one at all). No doubt Chris Woakes can swing the ball on home pitches for a few more Tests, but what England need in the next Ashes is a new-ball bowler who can also swing the ball but at a slightly quicker pace, with a more threatening mien than good old Woakesy, and bowl heavy-duty spells with an old one.Dillon Pennington fits this bill: aged 25, now at Nottinghamshire where he made a technical change in the timing of his arm swing, which has increased his pace since leaving Worcestershire. He was selected for England’s squad last summer against West Indies, but the bright idea was to play Mark Wood in back-to-back Tests instead (whereupon Wood broke down). Instead of making his Test debut, Pennington was deployed to the Hundred, where he sustained a hamstring problem in delivering a five-ball set, and has only just started bowling again.
Most important player: Jamie Smith
England’s ever-growing tendency to bat like headless chickens, or gung-ho village clubbies on tour after an all-night lock-in, has to be arrested: and to give England’s middle order the chance to be audacious, they need a platform less flimsy than the one they are being given by England’s top three. Enter, please, Jamie Smith.
As he proved last summer, when keeping wicket down the order, Smith can defend and build an innings – before hitting as hard and far as anyone else. Excellent temperament for a No 3, and more composed than Ollie Pope, Smith is the man most qualified for this job – on condition that he gives up wicketkeeping and passes the role on to Pope if needs be, whose keeping is at the same level as Smith’s. Meanwhile, Bethell, the current incumbent at three, will have to compete for a place with openers Ben Duckett and Zak Crawley.
I am most looking forward to... some England resilience
England’s brittleness has reached the point where they have been dismissed in fewer than 40 overs four times in their last seven Tests. David Gower, restraint personified, was moved to describe England’s last innings in New Zealand as “ignominious” – and that was one of their better collapses in lasting all of 47.2 overs.
The management and players may shrug it off – but the old adage of doing what your opponent least wants still applies, and when England throw their wickets away they are doing exactly what their current opponents want and future opponents want to see. If England take a lead in the next Ashes, Australia can take heart that another lemming rush is just around the corner. The personnel has to change for this approach to improve, starting with Smith as above, and casting Bethell in the right slot: as opener or down the order, bowling spin instead of Shoaib Bashir.
County Championship winner? Surrey
It does not yet look to be the time when Surrey will do a Manchester City and fall from grace. Resources, resources and more resources: this is what sets them apart from all other counties. As if their pace-bowling stocks are not sufficiently ample, they have brought in Matthew Fisher from Yorkshire and Nathan Smith from New Zealand via Worcestershire. Hampshire and Somerset beat them on turners last season, and Surrey are unlikely to fly in Shakib Al Hasan of Bangladesh again for a one-off game, not after he has been suspended from bowling.
Ashes winner? England
I am going for a 3-2 scoreline, but it could just as easily be Australia who edge it. My belief/hope is based on McCullum’s side having deeper pace-bowling resources than Australia, who have relied on their “big three” of Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood for almost a decade.
Wishful thinking re Ashes ? Pennington, Wood, Stokes, Archer, Stone etc. Will they even be fit to go to Australia, and if so how will they deal with a full Test series ?
ReplyDeleteWhatever is happening in Afghanistan is not the players' fault. They have shown Incredible courage in continuing to play.
ReplyDeleteBut as the rules of membership state, there has to be provision, funding and encouragement for a women's equivalent side in every member country. Yes, it's not the fault of the players but the "medieval" Taliban don't appear to have an issue with non-compliance of the ICC rules.
DeleteYou could draw parallels with the South African apartheid regime, where banning South Africa from international representative sport went some way (over several years) to a regime change through a changing of minds and hearts there as White South Africa is and was sport mad. Afghanistan is cricket mad, by many accounts, so might a ban from International cricket lead to a change of hearts/minds/regime there too, eventually. A succession of wars appear to have failed in that department as has diplomacy. What are the alternatives, ignore the Taliban and their attitudes or perhaps pretend that the Taliban are a force for good and adopt their attitudes as well?
Meanwhile Afghanistanis should be free to play as individuals worldwide as were South Africans in the 1970s, in fact that would be paramount in increasing the pressure from the International ban.
I think your logic is impeccable, so I must be wrong. But I feel sorry for the men who have taken huge risks and built a good team in horrific circumstances. So can understand the minister's call further discussions on it. But the Taliban are not likely to compromise. Nobody wins with this, sadly
ReplyDeleteDry Powder or CO2 for electrical fires NEVER Water - I am SHOCKED!!!
ReplyDelete