Notts Outlaws Metro Bank Cup Averages & Milestones 2024

 

c/o MAG

HIGHEST SCORES

FOR

378-6

50 overs

Surrey (Guildford)

332

49.3 overs

Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)

AGAINST

369-6

50 overs

Leicestershire (Leicester)

333-3

46.4 overs

Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)

LOWEST SCORES

FOR

209

48.4 overs

Yorkshire (Welbeck)

AGAINST

126

30.5 overs

Yorkshire (Welbeck)


CENTURIES

FOR (4)

164

BT.Slater

Surrey (Guildford)

107*

BT.Slater

Sussex (Welbeck)

105

H.I.Hameed

Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)

101*

H.I.Hameed

Sussex (Welbeck)

AGAINST (4)

157

M.A.H.Hammond

Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)

123*

E.J.Byrom

Glamorgan (Neath)

103*

C.A.Ingram

Glamorgan (Neath)

100*

R.J.Das

Essex (Trent Bridge)

FOUR WICKETS IN AN INNINGS
FOR (2)

10-2-38-6  B.A.Hutton

Yorkshire (Welbeck)

10-0-45-5 R.Lord

Surrey (Guildford)

AGAINST (3)

8.2-1-31-5 J.A.Richards

Essex (Trent Bridge)


10-0-56-5 A.W.Gorvin

Glamorgan (Neath)


10-3-14-4 B.O.Coad

Yorkshire (Welbeck)

ECONOMICAL BOWLING

FOR


10-2-26-3 L.A.Patterson-White

Warwickshire (Rugby School)

AGAINST


10-3-14-4 B.O.Coad

Yorkshire (Welbeck)

EXPENSIVE BOWLING

FOR


10-0-105-3 L.W.James

Leicestershire (Leicester) (Notts Record)


10-0-76-1 L.A.Patterson-White

Surrey (Guildford)

AGAINST


10-1-78-3 C McKerr

Surrey (Guildford)


10-0-77-2 D.A.Douthwaite

Glamorgan (Neath)

MOST DISMISSALS IN AN INNINGS

FOR

T.J.Moores (3 ct) v Sussex (Welbeck)

AGAINST

W.T.E.Smale (3 ct) for Glamorgan (Neath)

J.R.Bracey (2 ct, 1st) for Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)

MOST CATCHES BY A FIELDER IN AN INNINGS

FOR

F.W.McCann (3) v Leicestershire (Leicester)

AGAINST

B.W.M.Mike (3) for Leicestershire (Leicester)

T.R.Bevan (3) for Glamorgan (Neath)


HIGHEST PARTNERSHIPS
FOR


1st

56

B.T.Slater (38) F.W.McCann (20) v Gloucestershire(Trent Bridge)


2nd

187

B.T.Slater (164) J.A.Haynes (86) v Surrey (Guildford)


3rd

209*

B.T.Slater (107*) H.I.Hameed (101*) v Sussex (Welbeck) (Notts Record)


4th

129

H.I.Hameed (105) L.W.James (61) v Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)


5th

80

H.I.Hameed (105) T.J.Moores (40) v Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)


6th

73*

J.A.Haynes (57*) T.J.Moores (30*) v Warwickshire (Rugby School)




73

L.W.James (76) T.J.Moores (23) v Yorkshire (Welbeck)


7th

31*

T.J.Moores (24*) L.A.Patterson-White (7*) v Surrey (Guildford)


8th

42

L.A.Patterson-White (38*) B.A.Hutton (10) v Yorkshire (Welbeck)


9th

16

M.Montgomery (52) R.Lord (8) v Essex (Trent Bridge)


10th

16*

T.W.Loten (14*) T.H.S.Pettman (9*) v Glamorgan (Neath)

LEADING PARTNERSHIPS AGAINST (100 RUNS OR ABOVE)


1st

151

M.A.H.Hammond (157) C.T.Bancroft (52) for Gloucestershire (Trent Bridge)




103

E.J.Byrom (123*) W.T.E.Smale (37) for Glamorgan (Neath)


3rd

185

R.J.Das (100*) N.R.M.Thain (83) for Essex (Trent Bridge)




170*

E.J.Byrom (123*) C.A.Ingram (103*) for Glamorgan (Neath)

Just my opinions:


Not enough runs scored, may be..


Certainly over all, runs not scored quickly enough, look at the scoring rates. Apart from LPW , no regular player exceeded scoring at a run a ball by any meaningful amount.

Hameed and Slater scored "heavily" according to the official Pravda line with 345 and 398 runs respectively. As a comparison, before the semi-finals, two players had scored over 400 runs in this year's competition, Jake Libby (414 @ 86.63) and Sol Budinger (405@ 99.75). What do those two have in common?

Extras: 91 against v 46 for, that's a 5-6 runs deficit every game. Is that down to our wayward bowling, more disciplined opposition bowling, or perhaps something else...


Definitely not enough wickets taken. [perhaps if the skipper had held more of the catches that had gone his way] Surplus to Moores' requirements, Fateh Singh took 15 @20.27 for a comparison. 

 ARPOs weren't bad apart from Lyndon who took a walloping at Leicester in the first game and was held back / protected in most of the games that followed. 

A good first dip [in the water] for Lord - have the club acted to make the signature more prolonged or don't the coaching staff rate him enough (or perhaps Lord doesn't rate them)?

They are taking their time and considering that his top speed is a rare commodity, he will get his offers from elsewhere if the Moores'/Newell team drag their feet for much longer. Have they literally taken their eye off the ball again?